Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Polythene Bag Factory Vs. Assistant P.F. Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P. (C) No.5362/2013 M/S POLYTHENE BAG FACTORY ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Adv. Versus ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 16.04.2010 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, in ATA No.398 (5) of 2003.2. The petitioner has also assailed the recovery proceedings emanating therefrom.3. Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an Establishment functioning in the Forest Department under the State of Gujarat. It has not applied voluntarily for the coverage of The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Act, 1952 (for short EPF Act), but the EPF Authority / Respondent brought the petitioner / Establishment ...
Raman Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.274/1999 Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 RAMAN ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ankur Sood, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) was filed by two brothers, Raman Kumar and Arun Kumar. By order dated 20 th August, 2014, Arun Kumar was held to be a juvenile on the date of commission of offence and accordingly the benefit under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 was granted. The said order records that Arun Kumar had stated that he would not like to contest his conviction but the order of sentence may be set aside and quashed. The appeal, therefore, filed by Arun Kumar stands disposed of vide order dated 20th August, 2014. Th...
Dharmaprachar Sabha and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7969/2014 & CM No.18678/2014 (for stay) DHARMAPRACHAR SABHA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Manjula Gupta, Mr. Kanak Tyagi, Mr. Nikhil Sharma & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Deepak Gupta, Mr. Amit Kishore Sinha, Ms. Indu Prabha & Ms. Sonya Rathore, Advs. Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu & Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks i) revocation of the Certificate issued by the respondent No.2 Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to the Hindi film Singham Returns on the ground that the same on the one hand shows one religion and its religious and spiritual practices, places and leade...
Jaintia Highway Private Ltd. Vs. National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:19. 11.2014 + O.M.P. 1310/2014 JAINTIA HIGHWAY PRIVATE LTD ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the petitioner: Mr Sandeep Sethi & Mr Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advs. with Mr Rakesh Sinha, Mr Sourav Ghosh & Mr Samrat Sengupta, Advs. For the respondent: Mr Pradeep K. Bakshi & Ms Prachi V. Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act,1996 (in short the Act) for seeking an injunction qua a bank guarantee dated 01.12.2012, furnished by Axis Bank Ltd., Kolkata, on behalf of the petitioner herein.2. Shorn of verbiage, the injunction qua the bank guarantee is sought on the ground that it could be invoked and encashed if and only if there was default on the part of the petitioner in the due and faithful performance of its obligation during the c...
Airports Authority of India Vs. M/S Jagson Airlines Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1830/2005 19th November, 2014 % AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ......Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, adv. VERSUS M/S JAGSON AIRLINES LTD. Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R. Sudhinder and Ms. Prerana Amitabh, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 24.5.2005. The first appellate court by the impugned judgment set aside the judgment of the original court/Civil Judge dated 7.7.2004 by which the Civil Judge had dismissed the objections under Section 30 and 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 filed by the respondent/objector against the Award of the arbitrator dated 28.10.1998. First appellate court set aside the judgment of the original court/Civil Judge and the Award firstly on the ground that the Award ...
M/S Orchid Info Solution Pvt Ltd Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ 28. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1918/2014 % Judgment dated 19.11.2014 M/S ORCHID INFO SOLUTION PVT LTD Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Ashish Rana and Mr. Shaveer Ahmed, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A.11850/2014 1. This is an application under Order 40 Rule 1 and Order 12 Rule 6 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree on admissions.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of possession, use and occupation charges. As per the plaint, the suit property comprises of a basement, ground floor approximately measuring 6000 Sq. Ft. forming part of property bearing No.2/15, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi-110008 as shown in red colour in the site plan (hereinafter referred to as the suit property). The suit property was given on rent to the defendant in terms of a lease deed dated 24.02.2009, regi...
Shabban Vs. C.B.i./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Sh.Anil Kumar Bagania Vs. Smt. Shiv Rani and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC. REV. No.86/2012 19th November , 2014 % SH.ANIL KUMAR BAGANIA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. S.D.Ansari, Adv. VERSUS SMT. SHIV RANI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. O.P.Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) is filed by the petitioner-tenant impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 17.8.2011 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner-tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one shop bearing No.2896 on ground floor of premises bearing No.2893-2899, Chehlpuri, Kinari Bazar, Delhi110006.2. for As per the eviction petition filed before the court below need...
Dharmaprachar Sabha and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7969/2014 & CM No.18678/2014 (for stay) DHARMAPRACHAR SABHA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Manjula Gupta, Mr. Kanak Tyagi, Mr. Nikhil Sharma & Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay with Mr. Deepak Gupta, Mr. Amit Kishore Sinha, Ms. Indu Prabha & Ms. Sonya Rathore, Advs. Mr. K. Raghavacharyulu & Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks i) revocation of the Certificate issued by the respondent No.2 Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to the Hindi film Singham Returns on the ground that the same on the one hand shows one religion and its religious and spiritual practices, places and leade...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Ishwari Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~A-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 236/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth and Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advs. versus ISHWARI DEVI AND ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Monica Phartyal, Adv. for Mr.S.N.Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 9.1.2013. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition and thereafter the present appeal are that the deceased Pradeep Kumar Kaushik met with a fatal accident on 11.10.2010 at 3.00 am on Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. The deceased was a pillion rider on the motorcycle driven by Deepak Dabral respondent No.2. They were coming to Delhi from Jaipur via Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. It is averred that respondent No.2 was driving the motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner. Opposite B D M Hospital, Kotputli a man came in front of the motorcycle and...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »