Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh.Anil Kumar Bagania Vs. Smt. Shiv Rani and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC. REV. No.86/2012 19th November , 2014 % SH.ANIL KUMAR BAGANIA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. S.D.Ansari, Adv. VERSUS SMT. SHIV RANI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. O.P.Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) is filed by the petitioner-tenant impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 17.8.2011 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner-tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one shop bearing No.2896 on ground floor of premises bearing No.2893-2899, Chehlpuri, Kinari Bazar, Delhi110006.2. for As per the eviction petition filed before the court below need...
Army Welfare Housing Organisation Vs. Adjutant Generals Branch and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + LPA No.867/2013 ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION .. Appellant Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Tinu Bajwa, Mr. Amandeep Joshi and Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advs. Versus ADJUTANT GENERALS BRANCH & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, Mr. Nishant Gautam & Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Prashant Bhushan & Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra, Advs. for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 4th September, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5567/2013 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the order dated 23rd July, 2013 of the Central Information Commission (CIC) holding the appellant to be a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) and directing the appellant to...
Ram Kumar and Ors Vs. State of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3271/2014 & CRL.M.A. 14677/2014 RAM KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. J.N. Pathak, Advocate Versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State with SI Jaspal Singh, PS Mangol Puri Mr. D.K. Srivastav, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.803/2013 registered under Sections 380/451/448/506/120B IPC at Police Station Mangol Puri on 13.12.2013 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. This matter came up for preliminary hearing on a number of dates previously when counsel for the second respondent/complainant was also present. However, no formal notice appears to have been issued in the matter so far. Consequently, notice is now issued to the respondents.3. Counsel for respondent No.1/State, as well as...
Faheem Ahmad Vs. C.B.I./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Rajkumar Dyeing and Printing Works Private Limited and Vs. Competition ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5947/2014 & CM145382014 RAJKUMAR DYEING & PRINTING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rakesh Sinha and Mr Pradeep Gupta. For the Respondents : MrVaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena kumara and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr AnujAggarwal, Mr Niti Jain and Mr Gaurav Khanna for R2. AND + W.P.(C) 6260/2014 & CM151462014 M/S R S INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rana S. Biswas and Mr Sunil Sharma. For the Respondents : Mr Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena Kumari and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr Vineet Malhotra for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions call into question the penalties imposed by th...
Tejram Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2014 + TEJRAM CRL.A. 142/2012 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Swarup, proxy counsel for Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N.Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with ASI Bijendra Singh, Police Station Mehrauli. Mr. R.P. Khatana, Adv. for respondents No.2 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This criminal appeal u/s 372 Cr.P.C has been filed by the victim Shri Tej Ram, feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.11.2011 in case FIR No.548/2004 u/s 308/34 IPC, P.S. Mehrauli, vide which respondents 2 to 6 were acquitted.2. Succinctly stated, prosecution case is as follows:D.D.No.19 dated 05.09.2004 was recorded on the basis of an information received from HC Rohtash of PCR regarding quarrel at the house of Dev Ram at Village Chandanhola. HC Hanuman Sahai(PW7) along with HC Manohar (PW8) reached the sp...
Sanjay Gupta Vs. Rajiv Gupta and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.765/2012 Decided on :19. h November, 2014 Petitioner SANJAY GUPTA Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht & Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Advs. Versus Respondents RAJIV GUPTA & ANR. Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, Sanjay Gupta, against respondent No.1, Rajiv Gupta and his sister-in-law (respondent No.2), Alka Gupta on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the judgment dated 9.1.2006.2. Before dealing with the allegations of contempt, it would be worthwhile to give brief background of the case. Rajiv Gupta, respondent No.1 herein, filed a suit for partition, rendition of accounts and injunction in respect of the properties allegedly owned and possessed by his father L.R. Gupta in the capacity of karta of HUF. The details of the immovable properties were mentioned in schedule A attached to the plaint and d...
the New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Ishwari Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~A-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 236/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth and Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advs. versus ISHWARI DEVI AND ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Monica Phartyal, Adv. for Mr.S.N.Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 9.1.2013. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition and thereafter the present appeal are that the deceased Pradeep Kumar Kaushik met with a fatal accident on 11.10.2010 at 3.00 am on Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. The deceased was a pillion rider on the motorcycle driven by Deepak Dabral respondent No.2. They were coming to Delhi from Jaipur via Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. It is averred that respondent No.2 was driving the motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner. Opposite B D M Hospital, Kotputli a man came in front of the motorcycle and...
Sh. Karanveer Singh Vs. Sh. Dharamveer Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 604/2013 19th November, 2014 % SH. KARANVEER SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Sandeep Agarwal, Adv. with Mr.M.K. Singh, Adv. versus SH. DHARAMVEER SINGH & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr.Ajay Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff impugning the order of the trial court dated 6 th May, 2013 by which the trial court has rejected an application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred as to the Act) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to lead additional evidence and also for cross examining the witness of the other side.2. Paras 2 and 4 of the impugned judgment are relevant and the same read as under:2 Ld. counsel for the plaintiff s...
M/S R S Industries Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5947/2014 & CM145382014 RAJKUMAR DYEING & PRINTING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rakesh Sinha and Mr Pradeep Gupta. For the Respondents : MrVaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena kumara and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr AnujAggarwal, Mr Niti Jain and Mr Gaurav Khanna for R2. AND + W.P.(C) 6260/2014 & CM151462014 M/S R S INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rana S. Biswas and Mr Sunil Sharma. For the Respondents : Mr Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena Kumari and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr Vineet Malhotra for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions call into question the penalties imposed by th...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »