Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kumar Yadav and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5244/2014 RAM KUMAR YADAV & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Surya Nath Pandey, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Hasrat Ali, CAW Cell. R-2 in preson. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.17926/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5244/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.421/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ghazipur on 8th October, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as compla...
Rajnish Kumar Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7452/2014 & CM No.17671/2014 RAJNISH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vaibhav Kalra and Ms.Sumedha Dang, Advocates for respondent nos.1 & 2. Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Date of Decision :19. h November, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:a) Issue a writ of certiorari, mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to admit the petitioner in M.Ch.(Paediatrics Surgery), PGIMER, Dr.R.M.L.Hospital for the Session 2014-2015. b) To direct the respondents to admit the petitioner in M. Ch.(Paediatrics Surgery), PGIMER, Dr.R.M.L.Hospital for the Session 2014-2015 in terms of the observation and ratio laid down by the Division Bench of the Honble High ...
Praveen Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + TEST CASE NO.84/2013 PRAVEEN SHARMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. versus STATE .....Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present probate petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for grant of probate/letters of administration in respect of the registered Will dated 15th May, 1998 executed by Late Pandit Sham Lal Sharma (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) who died on 28th January, 2004 at Delhi.2. It has been stated by the petitioner, daughter-in-law of the deceased that the deceased left behind the following class I heirs: (i) Smt. Krishna Devi (widow). (ii) Shri Kulbhushan Sharma (Son). (iii) Shri Jai Prakash (Son). (iv) Smt. Nisha (grand-daughter). (v) Smt. Praveen Sharma(daughter-in-law...
Alka Tyagi Vs. Bijender Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2098/2014 ALKA TYAGI Through: .... Plaintiff Dr. Suman Chaudhary, Advocate versus BIJENDER SINGH & ORS Through: None ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific performance and permanent injunction under Sections 10 and 34 of Specific Relief Act with respect to land comprising in Khasra No.15//3(4-5), 4(2-18), 5(2-1), 26 (0-3), 1(112), situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Devrala, Delhi.2. Summons in the suit and notice in the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2, were issued on 21.07.2014. Despite service none appeared for the defendants, consequently the defendants were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 22.08.2014. Time was granted to the plaintiff to file affidavits by way of evidence.3. Plaintiff has filed her affidavit by way of evidence and same has been exhibited as Ex.PW1/A. PW1 has d...
Sandeep Kumar and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:19. h November 2014 + W.P.(C) 963/2014 SANDEEP KUMAR & ORS Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocates ..... Respondents Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr.Amrit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. In this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the six petitioners have challenged the introduction of the criteria of mandatorily qualifying the interview test comprising 25 marks for selection to the post of ASI (Radio Mechanic) and HC (Radio Operator) in Border Security Force Communication, set up in September 2013 through an advertisement. The petitioners also seek quashing of the results of the interview held for the aforesaid post at Delhi Centre at STS BSF, New Delhi from 23.12.2013 to 1.1.2014...
Balkishan Thapar Vs. Dharmendra, Principal Secretary, Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Cont. Cas (C) No.677/2013 & C.M. No.15162/2014 Decided on :19. h November, 2014 BALKISHAN THAPAR Through: Petitioner Mr. R.P. Luthra, Advocate. Versus DHARMENDRA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, SC for R-1 to 3 & 5. Ms. Zubeda Begum, SC with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a contempt petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.7.2012 passed in Cont. Cas (C) No.120/2012. A direction has also been sought in the contempt petition for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of the acquired plot of land.2. I have heard Mr. R.P. Luthra, the learned counsel for the petitioner. So far as the prayer of allotment of an alternative plot in contempt proceedings is concerned, that prayer cannot be allowed. It has to be by way of an independent writ petition. Th...
Md Dilawar Mir Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1535/2014 MD DILAWAR MIR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha, Mr. Gopal K. Sharma, Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. with Insp. Dharmendra Kumar, CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 1535/2014 Admit. CRL.M.(B) 10918-10919/2014 These applications seek stay of the impugned judgment on conviction dated 27.09.2014; as well as the impugned order on sentence dated 01.11.2014 qua the appellant-Md Dilawar Mir, passed by the Special Judge, CBI, in CC No.71/11, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 120B IPC and with Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine...
Mohd Shamsheed @ Shamsheer Vs. the State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5238/2014 MOHD SHAMSHEED @ SHAMSHEER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Ajay Kumar, PS Dabri Mr. Sarbesh Wardha, Adv. for R-2-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 19.11.2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.827/2005 registered under Section 304A IPC at Police Station Dabri on 28.11.2005 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, enter appearance and accept notice. Both the complainants, Ram Kumar and Smt. Urmila, are present in person. The Investigating Officer, Sub-Inspector Ajay Kumar, Police Station Dabri, also identifies the complainants.4. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to b...
Sanjay Gupta Vs. Rajiv Gupta and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.765/2012 Decided on :19. h November, 2014 Petitioner SANJAY GUPTA Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht & Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Advs. Versus Respondents RAJIV GUPTA & ANR. Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, Sanjay Gupta, against respondent No.1, Rajiv Gupta and his sister-in-law (respondent No.2), Alka Gupta on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the judgment dated 9.1.2006.2. Before dealing with the allegations of contempt, it would be worthwhile to give brief background of the case. Rajiv Gupta, respondent No.1 herein, filed a suit for partition, rendition of accounts and injunction in respect of the properties allegedly owned and possessed by his father L.R. Gupta in the capacity of karta of HUF. The details of the immovable properties were mentioned in schedule A attached to the plaint and d...
the New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Ishwari Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~A-18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 236/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth and Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advs. versus ISHWARI DEVI AND ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Monica Phartyal, Adv. for Mr.S.N.Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 9.1.2013. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition and thereafter the present appeal are that the deceased Pradeep Kumar Kaushik met with a fatal accident on 11.10.2010 at 3.00 am on Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. The deceased was a pillion rider on the motorcycle driven by Deepak Dabral respondent No.2. They were coming to Delhi from Jaipur via Jaipur-Delhi National Highway. It is averred that respondent No.2 was driving the motorcycle in a rash and negligent manner. Opposite B D M Hospital, Kotputli a man came in front of the motorcycle and...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »