Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs. Kiri Associates Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on :20. 11.2014 + OMP3852009 NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus KIRI ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Manoj Kumar Dass, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Gaurav Puri, Mr. Nupur Pandey, Mr. Aashish Gumber and Mr. Varun Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby challenge has been laid to award dated 30.01.2009 and a supplementary award, which is dated 10.04.2009.2. In this petition, briefly, the facts obtaining in the case are as follows :- 2.1 the petitioner herein, which is, National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. (in short NBCC) called for tenders for construction of the school building at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya at Chattarpur, M.P. 2.2 The respondent, ...
Ashok Kumar Vs. C.B.I./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Krishna Rani Khera and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~A-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 816/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate. versus KRISHNA RANI KHERA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.K.Vashisth, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Yogesh K.Chandna, Advocate for R2&3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.142/2014 (for restoration) For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original position. MAC.APP. 816/2011 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks recovery rights from the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle, namely, respondents No.2 and 3.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition and thereafter the present appeal are that respondent No.1 was returning home from a temple at Uttam Nagar on 22.02.2010. While crossing the road at Sanatan Dharam Mandir Gate, Uttam Nagar, she was hit by a speeding scooter coming from behind said to...
M/S. Panorama Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nandu Bhardwaj and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~R84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1577/2013 M/S. PANORAMA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak R.Dahiya, Adv. Versus NANDU BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide present petition, the petitioner seeks directions for setting aside the orders dated 31.05.2008, whereby the petitioner Management was proceeded ex-parte; accordingly award dated 29.09.2009 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.138/2007.2. Also seeks directions for initiating proceedings against respondent nos. 1 to 4, for the abuse of procedure.3. Perusal of the order sheets reveal that notice in the instant petition was issued vide order dated 08.03.2013. Since the petitioner failed to serve the respondent nos. 1 to 4 by ordinary process, they filed CM. No.15526/2013 seeking substituted servi...
Baljit Singh Dahiya Vs. B.S.E.S.Rajdhani Power Ltd. and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + s W.P.(C) 672/2014 Decided on IN THE MATTER OF: BALJIT SINGH DAHIYA :19. 11.2014 ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Wadhawan, Advocate with petitioner in person versus B.S.E.S.RAJDHANI POWER LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.N.Choudhri, Ms.Shruti Choudhri & Mr.Varun Rajpal, Advocates for R-1 Ms.Meenakshi Midha and Mr.Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocates for R-2 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondent No.1/BSES RPL to fix his salary on the basic pay, equivalent to one Mr.D.K.Sharma, w.e.f. 1.1.1994, with all the consequential benefits.2. A counter affidavit was filed by the respondent No.1/BSES RPL wherein, it was averred that the present petition is a gross abuse of the process of law inasmuch as the petitioner who had availed of SVRS on 31.12.2003, has concealed material facts from the court. Learned counsel f...
Shabban Vs. C.B.I./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Mahmood Vs. C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Mayank Pathak Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2014 BAIL APPLN. 1947/2014 MAYANK PATHAK Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhagat Sharma, Advocate along with the petitioner (in JC) versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By virtue of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.386/2013 u/s 498A/313/406/34 IPC registered with Police Station Rani Bagh, District North West.2. It is submitted by Sh. Ramesh Gupta, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for the last 90 days. The petitioner never raised any demand of dowry. The complainant used to pressurise the petitioner to purchase his own house in Delhi or to get the property bearing No.BP-143, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi transf...
Singh Raj Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 19, 2014 + CRL.A. 50/2014 SINGH RAJ Represented by: STATE & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Dinkar Verma, Advocate versus ..... Respondents Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Insp.Raman, SHO/PS Mehraulli SI Bijender Singh Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate for R2 and R-3 Mr.Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.50/2014 For the reasons stated in the application the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of. Crl.A.No.50/2014 1. Complainant is the appellant and his grievance is that respondents 2 to 4 have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326/34 IPC. He desires that the respondents should be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC.2. Learned counsel for the appellant urges that the impugned order dated January 21, 2013 would show that the l...
Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7139/2014 & CM No.16698/2014 (for stay). DANISH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Adv. Versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .. Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices dated 23rd September, 2013, 22nd January, 2014, 28th February, 2014 and 27th August, 2014 of the respondent under the said Section 248 (1) to the petitioner and order of restraining the respondent from proceeding to demolish the property of the petitioner as well as a direction to the respondent, to permit the petitioner to...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »