Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Scholastic India Private Limited Vs. Gurgaon Packaging Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 54/2014 & CA No.167/2014 SCHOLASTIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sacchin Puri with Mr. Vishesh Issar, Advocates. versus GURGAON PACKAGING PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Ms. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Ravi Data, Mr. Aman Bhalla and Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 20.11.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner contending that the respondent has failed to pay the admitted dues of Rs.80,00,000/- to the petitioner.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was a tenant in the property under the respondent. The tenancy was created by a registered lease deed dated 04.04.2012. The possession of the premises was handed over by the respondent to the petitioner on 04.04.2012 for the purpose of fitment etc. and the monthly rent Co. Pet. 54/2014 1 was to commence w.e.f. 01.06....
Jage Ram Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 20, 2014 (i) + LA.APP. 34/2006 JAGE RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: (ii) + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA LA.APP.35-54/2006 CHANDGI DECD. THR. LRS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Learned counsel for appellants submits the above captioned two LA.APP No.34/2006 LA.APP No.35-54/2006 Page 1 appeals are preferred by the two brothers and the findings returned in the impugned judgments are identical and therefore, these appeals can be heard together. Accordingly, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. T...
Ankur Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELH Reserved on: October 16, 2014 Pronounced on: November 20, 2014 + Crl.M.C. No.2455/12 & Crl.M.A.No.8318/2014 ANKUR CHAWLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate, with Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr.Amit Sharma, Ms.Kalyani Lal, Mr.Bhanoo Sood, Mr.Karan Kumar Gogna & Mr.Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate Crl. Rev.P.385/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.8308/2014 VIKAS SHUKLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.N.Hariharan Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is to common impugned order of 22nd May, 2012 vide which petitioners have been Crl.M.C.No.2455/2014 & Crl.Rev. P.No.385/2012 Page 1 cal...
Rajender Singh and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.3255/2013 RAJENDER SINGH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.S.B.Vashishtha, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Vinod Wadhwa and Ms.Nandini Aggarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Pursuant to order dated 09.10.2014, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.9,88,936/- for 1/6th share of Khasra No.39/14/2 (2-0), 17 (4-16) and 24 (4-14), having total area of 11 Bighas and 10 Biswas will be remitted in the court of Additional District Judge under Sections 3031 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that as per Section 34 of the Act, the respondent is liable to pay compensation alongwith interest in favour of the petitioners.3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits...
Suhail Ahmed Khan Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~40 to 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI40 W.P.(C) 7869/2014, CMs No.16461/2014 (for stay), 18462/2014 (for appointment of receiver), 18673/2014 (for ex-parte stay) & 18674/2014 (for intervention) SUHAIL AHMED KHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. D.P. Singh, Ms. Sonam Gupta, Mr. Rajkiran Vats, Mr. R.P. Vyas, Mr. Salil Bhattacharya and Mr. Paruesh Khanna, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, Mr. Sunil Dalal and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R-3&7. Mr. Waheeh Shafiq and Mohd. Qaseem, Advs. for Delhi Wakf Board with Mr. Rana Parveen Siddique, Member of DWB. Mr. Laliet Kumar, Adv. for R-5. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for R-6/DDA. Mr. R.V. Sinha, Adv. for R-9/CBI. Dr. Saif Mahmood and Mr. Abhijat, Advs. for Intervener in CMs No.18673/2014 & 18674/2014. AND41 W.P.(C) 7976/2014 & CM No.18696/2014 (for stay) AJAY GAUTAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Mohan and Mr....
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Shweta Khan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~A-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision20.11.2014 MAC.APP. 182/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate. Versus SHWETA KHAN & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant Insurance Company seeking to impugn the award dated 19.12.2011.2. The brief facts which gave rise to filing of the claim petition and the present appeal are that on 10.08.2007 the deceased Inam Khan was going on his motorcycle towards Delhi from Noida. He was hit by a truck driven by respondent No.2 in a rash and negligent manner at a very high speed.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal granted the following compensation:Loss of financial dependency Loss of future prospects Loss of love and affection Loss of consortium Funeral Expenses MAC APP. 182/2012 Rs.20,17,500/Nil Loss of Estate Total 4. Rs.10,000/Rs.20,52,50...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Metro Paint Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.981/2011 20th November, 2014 % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Advocate with Ms. D. Ray Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus METRO PAINT INDUSTRIES Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the court below dated 4.3.2010 by which it has been held that the respondent herein is not bound to surrender any land to the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) pursuant to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors. (1996) 4 SCC351read with the subsequent judgments being the judgment dated 4.12.1996 reported as M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (1997) 11 SCC327and the judgment dated 1.3.2001 in M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors. (2001) 4 SCC577 2. It is an undi...
M/S United Metal Store Vs. Sh. Ashok Khanna(Since Deceased) Through Lr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.187/2013 & C.M.No.7797/2013 (Stay) 20th November, 2014 % M/S UNITED METAL STORE Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Anurag Mangal, Advocate. VERSUS SH. ASHOK KHANNA(SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ...... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Khurana, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 28.1.2013 by which the ARC has rejected the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act by the respondent/landlord with respect to the suit/tenanted premises being one room/shop on the ground floor forming part of property bearing no.4708/VII, admeasuring 50 sq. yds. situ...
Edward Khimani Kamau Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 11.2014 + CRL.A. 1113/2011 EDWARD KHIMANI KAMAU Through ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate versus NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Through ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Malik, Adv. for NCB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Crl. M.B. No.186/2014 (suspension of sentence ) 1. Vide this application the appellant seeks suspension of sentence and release on bail primarily on the ground that the appellant has spent about four (4) years and ten (10) months in judicial custody as on 05.12.2013. Reliance was placed on Daler Singh v State of Punjab, 2007(1) CC Cases (HC) 252 wherein in case of a conviction under NDPS Act, certain guidelines were laid down, one of which was that where the convict is sentenced for ten years for having in his conscious possession the commercial quantity of the contraband, he shall be entitled to bail if he has already completed total sentence of four years which must include...
Bal Kishan Yadav Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5643/2013 BAL KISHAN YADAV Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER2011.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the impugned order No.7/2/2010-ND-2 dated 29.05.2012 whereby his representation seeking appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector in Central Police Organisation 2010 (hereinafter referred to as CPO2010??) in Other Backward Classes (in short OBC) category has been rejected. The petitioner also seeks directions to the respondents to offer appointment to the petitioner in Special Examination for recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in CPOs, 2010 under the OBC category on the basis of his merit alongwith all consequential benefits of seniority and pay at par ...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »