Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jage Ram Vs. Uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 20, 2014 (i) + LA.APP. 34/2006 JAGE RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: (ii) + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA LA.APP.35-54/2006 CHANDGI DECD. THR. LRS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Learned counsel for appellants submits the above captioned two LA.APP No.34/2006 LA.APP No.35-54/2006 Page 1 appeals are preferred by the two brothers and the findings returned in the impugned judgments are identical and therefore, these appeals can be heard together. Accordingly, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. T...
M/S. Hindustan Pencils Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anand Kumar Bajaj and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h OCTOBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1438/2011 & I.A.No.3178/2014 M/S. HINDUSTAN PENCILS PVT. LTD. Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sushant Singh, Advocate with Mr.P.C.Arya, Advocate. VERSUS ANAND KUMAR BAJAJ & ORS. Through : ..... Defendants None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. M/s. Hindustan Pencils Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, delivery up, etc. against the defendants. The case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under :2. The plaintiff earlier a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act has been converted into a private limited company. Mr.Manoj Dabke is the authorized signatory of the plaintiff to institute the present suit. It is further averred that the plaintiff is well established and is carrying on an ol...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Harish Chander Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.No.204/2014 & C.M.Nos.9752/2014 (Stay), 9753/2014 (Exemption) % 20th November, 2014 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Pramod Gupta, Advocate. VERSUS HARISH CHANDER SAHNI Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 19.11.2013 by which the ARC has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the suit/tenanted premises being two shops admeasuring 200 sq. ft. on the ground floor portion (garage portion) of the property bearing no.A-38, Ground Floor Vishal Enclave, New Delhi-27 as shown in red colour in...
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs. Kiri Associates Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on :20. 11.2014 + OMP3852009 NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner versus KIRI ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Manoj Kumar Dass, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Gaurav Puri, Mr. Nupur Pandey, Mr. Aashish Gumber and Mr. Varun Bhardwaj, Advocates CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby challenge has been laid to award dated 30.01.2009 and a supplementary award, which is dated 10.04.2009.2. In this petition, briefly, the facts obtaining in the case are as follows :- 2.1 the petitioner herein, which is, National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. (in short NBCC) called for tenders for construction of the school building at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya at Chattarpur, M.P. 2.2 The respondent, ...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Shri Msh Beig
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 272/2012 & CM No.561/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Petitioner versus SHRI MSH BEIG ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 332/2012 & CM No.720/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD ..... Petitioner versus SHRI MSH BEIG ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr R.S. Mathur, Mr Dinesh Mathur & Ms Jyoti Daxtidar. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners are insurance companies and impugn an order dated 16.08.2011 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) directing the Life Insurance Company as well as all four general insurance companies to disclose information in response to RTI applications as per the principles settled by the Supreme Court in CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay: (2011) 8 SCC497 2. The principal grievance of the petitioners is that the impugned order directs disclosure of certain inf...
Ankur Chawla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELH Reserved on: October 16, 2014 Pronounced on: November 20, 2014 + Crl.M.C. No.2455/12 & Crl.M.A.No.8318/2014 ANKUR CHAWLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate, with Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr.Amit Sharma, Ms.Kalyani Lal, Mr.Bhanoo Sood, Mr.Karan Kumar Gogna & Mr.Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate Crl. Rev.P.385/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.8308/2014 VIKAS SHUKLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.N.Hariharan Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is to common impugned order of 22nd May, 2012 vide which petitioners have been Crl.M.C.No.2455/2014 & Crl.Rev. P.No.385/2012 Page 1 cal...
Edward Khimani Kamau Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 11.2014 + CRL.A. 1113/2011 EDWARD KHIMANI KAMAU Through ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate versus NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Through ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Malik, Adv. for NCB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Crl. M.B. No.186/2014 (suspension of sentence ) 1. Vide this application the appellant seeks suspension of sentence and release on bail primarily on the ground that the appellant has spent about four (4) years and ten (10) months in judicial custody as on 05.12.2013. Reliance was placed on Daler Singh v State of Punjab, 2007(1) CC Cases (HC) 252 wherein in case of a conviction under NDPS Act, certain guidelines were laid down, one of which was that where the convict is sentenced for ten years for having in his conscious possession the commercial quantity of the contraband, he shall be entitled to bail if he has already completed total sentence of four years which must include...
All India Students Association (Aisa) and Ors Vs. the Chief Election o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h November, 2014. + LPA No.566/2014 ALL INDIA STUDENTS ASSOCIATION (AISA) & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Juno Rahman, Adv. Versus THE CHIEF ELECTION OFFICER (DUSU ELECTION201415) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 26th August, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5465/2014 preferred by the three appellants.2. Though the appeal came up first before us for admission only on 10th November, 2014 but the counsel for the respondents, the Delhi University and its Chief Election Officer for the Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) Elections, 2014-2015 having appeared before us on advance notice, we, with consent of counsels, heard the counsels finally on the appeal and reserved judgment.3. The writ petiti...
Bal Kishan Yadav Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5643/2013 BAL KISHAN YADAV Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vijay Kinger, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER2011.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the impugned order No.7/2/2010-ND-2 dated 29.05.2012 whereby his representation seeking appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector in Central Police Organisation 2010 (hereinafter referred to as CPO2010??) in Other Backward Classes (in short OBC) category has been rejected. The petitioner also seeks directions to the respondents to offer appointment to the petitioner in Special Examination for recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in CPOs, 2010 under the OBC category on the basis of his merit alongwith all consequential benefits of seniority and pay at par ...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Shweta Khan and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~A-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision20.11.2014 MAC.APP. 182/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate. Versus SHWETA KHAN & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate for R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant Insurance Company seeking to impugn the award dated 19.12.2011.2. The brief facts which gave rise to filing of the claim petition and the present appeal are that on 10.08.2007 the deceased Inam Khan was going on his motorcycle towards Delhi from Noida. He was hit by a truck driven by respondent No.2 in a rash and negligent manner at a very high speed.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal granted the following compensation:Loss of financial dependency Loss of future prospects Loss of love and affection Loss of consortium Funeral Expenses MAC APP. 182/2012 Rs.20,17,500/Nil Loss of Estate Total 4. Rs.10,000/Rs.20,52,50...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »