Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 6 of about 1,333 results (0.020 seconds)Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Chen Ching Sung
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1267 of 2014 Reserved on:20. h November 2014 Decision on:28. h November 2014 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal with Mr. Shashwat, Advocates. versus CHEN CHING SUNG ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nikita Sharma, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2811.2014 1. This appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) is directed against the judgment dated 31st May 2012 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.8 of 2009 acquitting the Respondent of the offence under Sections 22 and 23 of the Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case of the prosecution 2. The case of the prosecution is that Mr. R.R. Kumar (PW-7) Superintendent, NCB, received a secret information on 11 th October 2008 that the Respondent, a Taiwanese national, was likely to board a Malaysian Airlines for Kuala Lumpur that very night with a huge quantity of Methamphetamine (Met...
Tag this Judgment!Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd... Vs. Kamlesh and Ors(Reliance Gener ...
Court: Delhi
$~46 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 1082/2014 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate versus KAMLESH & ORS(RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD) ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH,J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to impugn the award dated 24.09.2014. The background facts are that on 11.09.2012, respondent no.1 was going on a motorcycle as a pillion rider. When he reached the flyover near Nand Nagri Depot, the motorcycle was hit from the side by a Gramin Sewa vehicle. As a result, respondent no.1 fell down. In the mean time one tempo ran over her leg. The appellant is the insurer of the tempo.2. The Tribunal noted that the respondent no.1 was a student and was 19 years of age. She was taking coaching in computer course but due to the injury sustained by her she could not work and her training in computer course suspended. The T...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Kumar Vs. Union Public Service Commission and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~19 & 23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:28. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 8319/2014 & CM APPL. 19276-19280/2014 SATISH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit S Chadha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Bakshi, Advocate versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION & ANR.... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocate Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta and Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv. for UPSC % W.P.(C) 8373/2014 & CM APPL. 19386-19389/2014 RITWIK RAJ SAXENA Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Debesh Panda, Ms. Amrita Panda and Ms. Shweta Sharma, Advocates versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR...... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC Mr. Naresh Kaushik Ms. Aditi Gupta and Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Adv. for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. These petitioners claim to be aggrieved by a common order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribuna...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Sharma @ Gullu Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :26. h November, 2014 Pronounced on :28. h November, 2014 % + CRL.A. 848/2011 RAJESH SHARMA @ GULLU ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The Appellant Rajesh Sharma @ Gullu has preferred this appeal impugning the judgment dated 28th May, 2011 and order on sentence dated 1st June, 2011 whereby he had been convicted for committing an offence under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for seven years as well fine of Rs.1000/-, in default, S.I. for one month.2. In brief, the prosecution case is that the PW1 complainant who happened to be mother of the Prosecutrix made a statement Ex.PW1/A to the effect that her daughter S(name withheld) aged 23 years had been missing from the house. S was mentally challenged and not even in a position to speak clearly. She tried to s...
Tag this Judgment!Obinna Basil Anaebo @ Emmanuel Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 434/2014 OBINNA BASIL ANAEBO @ EMMANUEL ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumi Anand and Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State with SI Sanjiv, PS Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. A. 434/2014 & Crl. M.B. 737/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18414/2014 1. The aforesaid appeal was admitted for hearing by this Court on 4th April, 2014 and the matter was directed to be listed in the week commencing 25th August, 2014 in the category of Regulars. Since the main appeal itself had been listed for final hearing on a fixed date, consequently, the prayer of the appellant for suspension of sentence was declined at that stage and it was further directed that in case the matter is not heard on that date then the appellants application for suspension of sentence will be considered.2. The present appeal has not been taken up for fin...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Sharma and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Govt of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5418/2014 VINOD SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocate with Petitioners in person versus STATE ( NCT OF GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with ASI Paramjit Singh, PS Tilak Nagar Mr. D.C. Akarniya, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. 18478/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5418/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.221/2009 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at police station Tilak Nagar on 01.10.2009, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. D.C. Akarniya, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and...
Tag this Judgment!Mamta Rani Vs. Sudhir Sharma
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 28, 2014 + MAT.APP. 121/2010 MAMTA RANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. G.C.Shukla, Advocate versus SUDHIR SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. A.K.Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Vide impugned judgment of 14th September, 2010, marriage of appellant with respondent has been declared to be nullity, as the material fact of mental illness of appellant-wife was concealed from respondenthusband. The factual background of this case already stands noticed in the opening paragraphs of the impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. Suffice it would be to note that the parties were married on 19 th April, 2007 but their marriage could not be consummated on the first night due to abnormal behavior of appellant-wife and within few months it became known that appellant-wife was suffering from mental disorder i.e. bipolar disorder alongwith seizures since the year 1998 and was under constant m...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Jethanand Jethwani and Anr. Vs. Sh. Ashok Kriplani and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P.No.91/2014 & C.M.No.12474/2013(Stay) 28th November, 2014 % DR. JETHANAND JETHWANI AND ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.Abinash Kumar Mishra, Advocate. VERSUS SH. ASHOK KRIPLANI AND ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms.Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant nos. 1 & 2 in the suit seeking setting aside of the judgment of the first appellate court dated 17.4.2013 by which the first appellate court held that the courts at Delhi have territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the matter. The judgment of the trial court dated 20.12.2011 was set aside which returned the plaint for presentation to the proper court at Kota in Rajasthan.2. The subject suit is a very peculiar suit to say the least. Plaintiffs in the suit, and th...
Tag this Judgment!Arjun Madan and Anr. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5439/2014 ARJUN MADAN & ANR. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. P. Roy Choudhary, Advocate with Petitioners. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocate with Complainant. Sub Inspector Rajesh Kumar, PS. B.K. Road. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.1162/2012 registered under Section 406, 498-A IPC on 27.12.2012 at police station Barakhamba Road, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocate for respondents No.2, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant is also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Rajesh Kumar, Barakhamba Road.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the inst...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Kumar Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5411/2014 DEEPAK KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner MR. Sunil K. Kalra, Advocate with petitioner. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Pooja Goel, Advocate with R2to 5. Sub Inspector Jay Deep Malik, P.S. Geeta Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18445/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5411/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.188/2013, registered under Sections 279/337 IPC on 09.05.2013 at police station Geeta Colony, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Pooja Goel, Advocate for respondents 2 to 5, enter appearance and accept notice. Respondent...
Tag this Judgment!