Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. Satpal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 5686/2014 C.M. Nos.14056-14057/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate AND % W.P.(C) 5762/2014 C.M. Nos.14205-14206/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of the parties, both the petitions have been heard together. The respondent/applicant had challenged his order of transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the CAT) and sought appropriate directions from the Central Government.2. By the order dated 22nd November, 2013, which is impugned in the present wri...
Sandeep Aggarwal Vs. Viniti Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2014 % + CRL.M.C. 3961/2014 SANDEEP AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Subhiksh Vasudev with Mr. Ishaan Madaan, Advocates. versus VINITI AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin with Mr. Abhishek, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for short), the petitioner has assailed the order dated 23.08.2014 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.456/3/12 titled Viniti Aggarwal vs. Sandeep Aggarwal.2. The main grievance of the petitioner/ husband in the present petition is that he was proceeded ex-parte by learned trial court on 23.08.2014 in his absence as he was informed the next date of hearing as 28.8.14, when he appeared before the Tr...
Pradeep Gautam Vs. Monika Gautam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 21, 2014 + CM(M) 1033/2014 PRADEEP GAUTAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarvam Ritam Khare, Advocate versus MONIKA GAUTAM Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.19124/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1033/2014 & C.M. No.19123/2014 (for stay) The respondents application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been allowed by trial court vide impugned order of 15 th January, 2014. Petitioner-husband has been called upon to pay interim maintenance of `5500/- per month to respondent-wife with litigation expenses of `6000/-. At the hearing it was submitted by learned counsel for petitionerhusband that in view of the judgment in Punit Kaur vs. Inderjeet Singh Sawney 183 (2011) DLT403trial court ought to have called upon the CM(M) No.1033/2014 Page 1 parties to give their affidavits regarding their financial status and the interim maintenance...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Satpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 5686/2014 C.M. Nos.14056-14057/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate AND % W.P.(C) 5762/2014 C.M. Nos.14205-14206/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of the parties, both the petitions have been heard together. The respondent/applicant had challenged his order of transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the CAT) and sought appropriate directions from the Central Government.2. By the order dated 22nd November, 2013, which is impugned in the present wri...
Shish Pal and ors Vs. Suresh Chand and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~A-53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 520/2012 SHISH PAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr.R.S.Mishra, Advocate. versus SURESH CHAND & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present appeal the appellants seek to impugn the award dated 25.02.2012 by which award the Tribunal concluded that the appellant has failed to show that the death of Smt. Gasna Devi occured due to a road traffic accident and hence, dismissed the claim petition.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 30.04.1999 Smt. Gasna Devi was being shifted from GTB Hospital to Jeevan Nursing Home. She was being shifted in an Ambulance. Inside the Ambulance she was accompanied by her husband Shish Pal, her brother Chandan Singh and other relatives. The Maruti Van Ambulance when it reached near Sarai Kale Khan at Outer Ring Road, was hit by an offending...
Kapil Kumar Ahluwalia Vs. Sunita Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Cont. Cas (C) No.219/2010 & C.M. Nos.14271/2010, 6914/2011, 20352/2011, 8734/2012 Decided on :21. t November, 2014 KAPIL KUMAR AHLUWALIA Petitioner Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Ms. Ayshwarya Chandar & Ms. Ankita Mahajan, Advocates. Versus SUNITA DEVI Through: Respondent Mr. Manoj Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a contempt petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the purported undertaking given to the court pursuant to which a compromise decree in terms of the settlement arrived at before the mediation centre between the parties was passed on 23.3.2009.2. I have heard Mr. Nigam, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Manoj Arora on behalf of the respondent and have also gone through the judgments relied upon by Mr. Nigam in respect of his contention.3. The case of the petitioner is that he had filed a suit being C.S. (O...
Sunil Sikri Vs. the Management Committee of Guru Harkrishan Public
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7744/2014 and CM APPL. 18228-18229/2014 Decided on :20. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: SUNIL SIKRI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. T.N. Tripathi, Advocate versus THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE OF GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for R-1 and R-2/School. Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for R-3/GNCTD. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing/setting aside the orders dated 28.03.2014 and 10.09.2014 passed by the respondent No.1/School and the Memorandum and Articles of Charge dated 17.12.2013 issued by the respondent No.2/Disciplinary Committee of the respondent No.1/School. The petitioner also seeks orders to restrain the respondent No.2/School and respondent No.3/DOE from continuing with the enquiry against him, on the basis of the Resolution dated 21.1...
Vikas Shukla Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELH Reserved on: October 16, 2014 Pronounced on: November 20, 2014 + Crl.M.C. No.2455/12 & Crl.M.A.No.8318/2014 ANKUR CHAWLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate, with Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr.Amit Sharma, Ms.Kalyani Lal, Mr.Bhanoo Sood, Mr.Karan Kumar Gogna & Mr.Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate Crl. Rev.P.385/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.8308/2014 VIKAS SHUKLA Through: .....Petitioner Mr.N.Hariharan Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Puneet Mittal, Adv. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Standing Counsel for CBI & Mr.Satyendera Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is to common impugned order of 22nd May, 2012 vide which petitioners have been Crl.M.C.No.2455/2014 & Crl.Rev. P.No.385/2012 Page 1 cal...
Scholastic India Private Limited Vs. Gurgaon Packaging Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 54/2014 & CA No.167/2014 SCHOLASTIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sacchin Puri with Mr. Vishesh Issar, Advocates. versus GURGAON PACKAGING PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Ms. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Ravi Data, Mr. Aman Bhalla and Mr. Siddharth Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 20.11.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner contending that the respondent has failed to pay the admitted dues of Rs.80,00,000/- to the petitioner.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was a tenant in the property under the respondent. The tenancy was created by a registered lease deed dated 04.04.2012. The possession of the premises was handed over by the respondent to the petitioner on 04.04.2012 for the purpose of fitment etc. and the monthly rent Co. Pet. 54/2014 1 was to commence w.e.f. 01.06....
Chandgi Decd. Thru Lrs Vs. Uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 20, 2014 (i) + LA.APP. 34/2006 JAGE RAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: (ii) + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA LA.APP.35-54/2006 CHANDGI DECD. THR. LRS .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate versus UOI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Learned counsel for appellants submits the above captioned two LA.APP No.34/2006 LA.APP No.35-54/2006 Page 1 appeals are preferred by the two brothers and the findings returned in the impugned judgments are identical and therefore, these appeals can be heard together. Accordingly, both these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. T...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »