Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kapil Kumar Ahluwalia Vs. Sunita Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Cont. Cas (C) No.219/2010 & C.M. Nos.14271/2010, 6914/2011, 20352/2011, 8734/2012 Decided on :21. t November, 2014 KAPIL KUMAR AHLUWALIA Petitioner Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam, Ms. Ayshwarya Chandar & Ms. Ankita Mahajan, Advocates. Versus SUNITA DEVI Through: Respondent Mr. Manoj Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a contempt petition filed by the petitioner against the respondent on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the purported undertaking given to the court pursuant to which a compromise decree in terms of the settlement arrived at before the mediation centre between the parties was passed on 23.3.2009.2. I have heard Mr. Nigam, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Manoj Arora on behalf of the respondent and have also gone through the judgments relied upon by Mr. Nigam in respect of his contention.3. The case of the petitioner is that he had filed a suit being C.S. (O...
State Vs. Janardhan Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 21, 2014 + CRL.A. 1072/2014 JNARDHAN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Vijay Singh, PS Alipur and W/SI Santosh Kumari, Security Unit CRL.A. 1420/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Vijay Singh, PS Alipur and W/SI Santosh Kumari, Security Unit versus JNARDHAN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Crl.A.No.1420/2014 has been filed by the State, on leave to appeal being granted against the judgment dated May 22, 2014, convicting Janardhan Gupta for the offence of having attempted to rape the prosecutrix who was aged around 14 years as on June 11, 2012, and for which offence he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years as per order...
Daya Ram Sharma Vs. Manju Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 21, 2014 + CM(M) 1035/2014 DAYA RAM SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar & Mr. Bijan Kumar Singh, Advocates versus MANJU SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.19155/2014 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1035/2014 & CM No.19154/2014 (stay) In a divorce petition filed by petitioner, respondents application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been allowed by trial court vide impugned order whereby interim maintenance of `12,000/- per month has been granted to the son and daughter of the parties who are aged 18 years and 14 years respectively. Litigation cost of `30,000/- have also been awarded to respondent. At the hearing, it was urged on behalf of petitioner-husband that the interim maintenance amount granted to the children of the CM(M) No.1035/2014 Page 1 parties is infact the annual expense and n...
Des Raj Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7977/2014 DES RAJ ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7983/2014 SURAJ CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Roshan Lal Goel For the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4 : Mr Amiet Andlay with Mr Prem Mishra CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM186982014 in WP(C) 7977/2014 & CM187042014 in WP(C) 7983/2014 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. WP(C) 7977/2014 & CM186972014 and WP(C) 7983/2014 & CM187032014 1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Mr Amiet Andlay appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 on advance notice. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondent No.3 Delhi Transport Corporation is not a necessary party and requests that the...
Thdc India Limited Vs. T. Chanda Biswas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 + W.P.(C) 7923/2013 THDC INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus T. CHANDA BISWAS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Neeraj Malhotra and Mr P. Garg. For the Respondents : Mr S. Nanda Kumar and Mr Parivesh Singh. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) allowing the respondents appeal and directing the petitioner to provide information relating to the proceedings of the Departmental Promotional Committee (hereafter DPC) for the years 2006, 2007 and 2009.2. The controversy to be addressed is whether the petitioner can be compelled to disclose the minutes of the DPC proceedings held for promotion to the post of AGM.3. The brief facts to address the aforesaid controversy are as under:- 3.1 The petitioner is a public corporation incorporate...
Commissioner of Income Tax-vi Vs. Valvoline Cummins Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2014 + ITA3192014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus VALVOLINE CUMMINS LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), which pertains to assessment year 2006-07, has to be dismissed, albeit for slightly different reasons as recorded in the order dated 29 th November, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short).2. The respondent-assessee had filed return of income declaring income of Rs.9,52,15,517/- for the assessment year 2006-07 on 30th November, 2006. After issue of notice under Section 143(2), assessment order under Section 143(3) was passed on 24th December, 2008 accepting the...
Mamchand and anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3732014 Decided on 21st November, 2014 MAMCHAND & ANR Through ..... Appellants :Mr. Yogesh Saroop and Mr. B.K. Roy, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Respondent : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. No.19191/2014 (for condonation of delay) 28 days delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM Appl. No.19190/2014 (for condonation of delay) 182 days delay in filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. FAO No.373/2014 1. Appellants filed a claim application under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (Tribunal) seeking compensation of `8,00,000/- on account of death of late Shri Kaushal in an untoward incident, which allegedly took place on 8th January, 2012 near Container Depot of Tugalakabad, relating to a train. After trial, Tribunal has dismissed the claim application.2. That is how appellants ar...
Narender Pal Singh Vs. Director of Education and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6759/2013 & CM No.14672/2013 NARENDER PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Dr Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms Pallavi Awasthi. For the Respondents : Mr Amiet Andlay for R1- & R-2. Mr B.B. Gupta with Mr Sarthak Ghonkrokta and Mr Udyan Srivastava for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns the decision of the Management Committee of respondent No.3, rejecting the petitioners request for re-employment after his superannuation as a Vice-Principal, which was communicated to him by an order dated 14.10.2013 (hereafter the impugned order). The petitioner also impugns respondent No.3s decision of 27.05.2013, rejecting the petitioners request for being re-employed as a Vice-Principal and further directing the petitioner to hand over the charge to another teacher.2. Accor...
Smt. Zubeda Vs. Shri Ismail Beg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 21, 2014 + RSA3552014 SMT. ZUBEDA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate versus SHRI ISMAIL BEG Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.19178/2014 There is delay of 133 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal. Misplacing of file by counsel is the reason put forth for the delay occasioned. Since the application is accompanied by affidavit of the counsel, this application is allowed and delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. RSA3552014 Appellant is the defendant, who has failed to contest respondentplaintiffs suit declaring General Power of Attorney of 11 th August, 2001 etc. in favour of appellant-defendant in respect of suit property being null and void. RSA No.355/2014 Page 1 The eviction petition under The Delhi Rent Control Act filed by respondent-plaintiff against appellant-defendant herein is stated to be pending and the sta...
Janardhan Gupta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 21, 2014 + CRL.A. 1072/2014 JNARDHAN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Vijay Singh, PS Alipur and W/SI Santosh Kumari, Security Unit CRL.A. 1420/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Vijay Singh, PS Alipur and W/SI Santosh Kumari, Security Unit versus JNARDHAN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Crl.A.No.1420/2014 has been filed by the State, on leave to appeal being granted against the judgment dated May 22, 2014, convicting Janardhan Gupta for the offence of having attempted to rape the prosecutrix who was aged around 14 years as on June 11, 2012, and for which offence he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years as per order...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »