Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narender Pal Singh Vs. Director of Education and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6759/2013 & CM No.14672/2013 NARENDER PAL SINGH ..... Petitioner versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Dr Vijendra Mahndiyan and Ms Pallavi Awasthi. For the Respondents : Mr Amiet Andlay for R1- & R-2. Mr B.B. Gupta with Mr Sarthak Ghonkrokta and Mr Udyan Srivastava for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns the decision of the Management Committee of respondent No.3, rejecting the petitioners request for re-employment after his superannuation as a Vice-Principal, which was communicated to him by an order dated 14.10.2013 (hereafter the impugned order). The petitioner also impugns respondent No.3s decision of 27.05.2013, rejecting the petitioners request for being re-employed as a Vice-Principal and further directing the petitioner to hand over the charge to another teacher.2. Accor...
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Satpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 5686/2014 C.M. Nos.14056-14057/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate AND % W.P.(C) 5762/2014 C.M. Nos.14205-14206/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of the parties, both the petitions have been heard together. The respondent/applicant had challenged his order of transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the CAT) and sought appropriate directions from the Central Government.2. By the order dated 22nd November, 2013, which is impugned in the present wri...
Mamchand and Anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3732014 Decided on 21st November, 2014 MAMCHAND & ANR Through ..... Appellants :Mr. Yogesh Saroop and Mr. B.K. Roy, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Respondent : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) CM Appl. No.19191/2014 (for condonation of delay) 28 days delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM Appl. No.19190/2014 (for condonation of delay) 182 days delay in filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. FAO No.373/2014 1. Appellants filed a claim application under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (Tribunal) seeking compensation of `8,00,000/- on account of death of late Shri Kaushal in an untoward incident, which allegedly took place on 8th January, 2012 near Container Depot of Tugalakabad, relating to a train. After trial, Tribunal has dismissed the claim application.2. That is how appellants ar...
Thdc India Limited Vs. T. Chanda Biswas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 + W.P.(C) 7923/2013 THDC INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus T. CHANDA BISWAS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Neeraj Malhotra and Mr P. Garg. For the Respondents : Mr S. Nanda Kumar and Mr Parivesh Singh. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) allowing the respondents appeal and directing the petitioner to provide information relating to the proceedings of the Departmental Promotional Committee (hereafter DPC) for the years 2006, 2007 and 2009.2. The controversy to be addressed is whether the petitioner can be compelled to disclose the minutes of the DPC proceedings held for promotion to the post of AGM.3. The brief facts to address the aforesaid controversy are as under:- 3.1 The petitioner is a public corporation incorporate...
Late Sh. Purshottam Dass (Since Deceased) Through Vs. Sh. Jagmohan Gol ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV.No.586/2012 21st November, 2014 % LATE SH. PURSHOTTAM DASS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate with Sh. Tulsi Dass on behalf of the legal heirs. Versus SH. JAGMOHAN GOLA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pramod Kumar Singhal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is filed by the petitioners/tenants impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 30.5.2012 which has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one room on the ground floor of the premises bearing no.613, Gali Kundey Walan,...
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Satpal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 5686/2014 C.M. Nos.14056-14057/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate AND % W.P.(C) 5762/2014 C.M. Nos.14205-14206/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of the parties, both the petitions have been heard together. The respondent/applicant had challenged his order of transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the CAT) and sought appropriate directions from the Central Government.2. By the order dated 22nd November, 2013, which is impugned in the present wri...
Sunil Aggarwal Vs. The Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19.11.2014 Pronounced on :21.11.2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2308/2014 SUNIL AGGARWAL Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Somnath Bhatri, Adv. versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DLEHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. By filing the present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Petitioner is seeking bail in case FIR No.393/2014 under Sections 406/420/174-A/34 IPC, PS Sangam Vihar, Delhi.2. The above noted FIR was registered on the basis of complaint made by Sh. Ram Vilas to the effect that he had been cheated of Rs.5.5 lacs and when he demanded his money, threat has been extended to him to kill him. He also reported that Anita Aggarwal and Sunil Aggarwal informed about a scheme under which they would pay him double the amount within three months. After selling his property as well collecting the amount of Committee, he paid Rs.7 lacs to them. After three ...
Smt. Sudershana Kumari Blagan Vs. Smt. Tulsan Devi Decd Thru Lrs and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~25 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA1712011 & Conn. 21st November, 2014 % +RSA1712011 SMT. SUDERSHANA KUMARI BLAGAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Tamali Wad and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Advs. Versus SMT. TULSAN DEVI DECD THRU LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.K.S.Pathania, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. for Mr. Anshumalee Sood through L.Rs. + RSA1722011 SMT. SUDERSHANA KUMARI BLAGAN Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Tamali Wad and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Advs. Versus SMT. TULSHAN DEVI THR LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.K.S.Pathania, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. for Mr. Anshumalee Sood through L.Rs. + RSA1732011 SMT. SUDERSHANA KUMARI BLAGAN ..... Appellant Through versus SHRI. ANSHUMALEE SOOD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. for Mr. Anshumalee Sood through L.Rs. Mr.K.S.Pathania, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19063/2014 (U/o 2...
Shish Pal and Ors Vs. Suresh Chand and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
$~A-53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:21. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 520/2012 SHISH PAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr.R.S.Mishra, Advocate. versus SURESH CHAND & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present appeal the appellants seek to impugn the award dated 25.02.2012 by which award the Tribunal concluded that the appellant has failed to show that the death of Smt. Gasna Devi occured due to a road traffic accident and hence, dismissed the claim petition.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 30.04.1999 Smt. Gasna Devi was being shifted from GTB Hospital to Jeevan Nursing Home. She was being shifted in an Ambulance. Inside the Ambulance she was accompanied by her husband Shish Pal, her brother Chandan Singh and other relatives. The Maruti Van Ambulance when it reached near Sarai Kale Khan at Outer Ring Road, was hit by an offending...
C.E. Constructions Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Intertoll Ics India (P) Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:17. 11.2014 Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2014 % + OMP1282/2014 C.E. CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND ANR. ..... PETITIONERS VERSUS INTERTOLL ICS INDIA (P) LTD. AND ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Balaji Subramanium, Ms. Jasleen K. Oberai, Ms. Surbhi Mehta and Mr. Ayud Sharma, Advocates for R-8 Mr. Jos Chiramel and Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocates for R-9 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) which came up for hearing on urgent basis during vacations. At that stage, while issuing notice, as a protem measure, respondent no.8 was directed to maintain status quo as of that date as regards funds, if any, received pursuant to settlement with the National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as NHAI)....
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »