Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
NooruddIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 811/2012 NOORUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CRL.A. 820/2012 SHAHID Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shafiullah, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Nooruddin and Shahid assail the judgment dated June 06, 2012 whereby they were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC for the murder of Ikramuddin and the order on sentence dated June 07, 2012 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5000/- each.2. The prosecution case rests on the testimony of two eye-witness...
Harjinder Pal Singh Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 118/ 2011 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: + Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. EX. P. 240/ 2013 HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.5652/ 2014 (O. XXI Rules 59, 91 & 92 CPC) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011 IA No.6423/ 2014 (Objections) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011, and EA (OS) No.288/ 2014 (Objections) in Ex. P. 240/ 2013 1. The three applications in the above stated suit and Execution Petition are taken up for disposal together as a common question of law and fact is involved in all the three applications moved by the applicant/ objector.2. CS (OS) No.171/2010 titled Harjinder Pal Si...
Amb Talent Media Private Limited Vs. Amandeep S. Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + I.A. No.16913/2009 in CS(OS) No.2509/2009 AMB TALENT MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Adv. with Ms. Neha Reddy and Mr. Siddhant Advs. versus AMANDEEP S. KHURANA Through ....Defendant Defendant already ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, misappropriation of trade secrets/ confidential information, malicious falsehood and for damages, rendition of accounts of profits, delivery up etc. against the defendant.2. The plaintiff is a private limited Company which was incorporated in March 2009 with the objective inter alia of carrying on talent searches, promoting such talent and providing work opportunities and coaching of people in various art forms.3. Mr. Preet Kanwar Singh Bedi is one of the Directors of the plaintiff and has a long and ric...
Shahid Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 811/2012 NOORUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CRL.A. 820/2012 SHAHID Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shafiullah, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Nooruddin and Shahid assail the judgment dated June 06, 2012 whereby they were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC for the murder of Ikramuddin and the order on sentence dated June 07, 2012 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5000/- each.2. The prosecution case rests on the testimony of two eye-witness...
Sanjay and Ors Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 SANJAY & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. A.S.I. A. Kumar. Ms.Bharti Malik, Advocate with complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.14934/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.274/2007, registered under Section 498-A/406/34 IPC at police station Adarsh Nagar on 19.05.2007, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State and Ms. Bharti Malik, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant, who is present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer, ASI A. Kumar.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the inst...
Abhinav Seth and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4035/2014 ABHINAV SETH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Anand, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Manohar Lal, PS Rajouri Garden. Mr. Raman Sahway, Advocate for R2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.12/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Rajouri Garden on 5th January, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Charika Seth are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer SI Manohar Lal, Police Station Rajour...
Manoj Saxena Vs. Ashok Goel and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.295/2014 24th November , 2014 MANOJ SAXENA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Amitabh Narayan, Adv. VERSUS ASHOK GOEL & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19234/2014 (preponing of date by the petitioner) Application for preponement is allowed. CM stands disposed of. The next date i.e 16.12.2014 stands cancelled. CM(M) No.295/2014 1. The petitioner, who is the defendant no.2(ii) in the suit, has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order of the trial court dated 27.11.2013 by which the trial court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for amendment of the written statement to add a new para 5A as under:5A. That the notice dated 13th August, 1969 is illegal as it has not been issued on behalf of the HUF of...
Dr. Prof. Ashok Kumar Keshari Vs. Manika Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:18. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 % + IA Nos.1742/2012 & 2193/2013 In CS(OS) 378/2011 DR. (PROF.) ASHOK KUMAR KESHARI ..... Plaintiff Versus MANIKA GUPTA AND ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Gurnani and Mr. Jai Singh, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Tripathy, Advocate for D-1 & 2 Mr. Dinesh Kr. Gutpa, Adv. For D-5, 7 & 8 Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. For D-6, 9 & 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J IA No.1742/2012 (u/O. 7 R. 11 CPC by D-1 &2) and IA No.2193/2013 (u/O. 7 R. 11 CPC by D-5, 7 &8) 1. Interlocutory application (IA) No.1742/2012 has been filed by defendant nos.1 and 2 while the other application, being: IA No.2193/2013 has been filed by defendant nos.5, 7 & 8. These are applications filed for seeking rejection of the plaint.2. The grounds articulated in the application are broadly as follows : First, that the suit filed...
Karam Bir Vs. State of Nct Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5326/2014 KARAM BIR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Dahiya and Mr. L.K. Dahiya, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Satyabir Singh, PS North Rohini. Mr. Sandeep, Advocate for R-2 and 3 with R-2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 18133/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5326/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.790/2014 registered under Sections 341/323 IPC at Police Station North Rohini, New Delhi on 21st October, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf...
Amita Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4529/2014 & CM90252014 AMITA MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda for L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »