Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxmi Narayan @ Lambu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851 of 2010 LAXMI NARAYAN @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. And CRL.A. 853 of 2010 DEVENDER @ RAMU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2411.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th May 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 (ASJ) (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38/09 convicting the Appellants, Laxmi Narain @ Lambu and Devender @ Ramu, for the offences under Sections 452 read with 34 IPC and Sections 308/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 21 st May 2010 whereby each of them was sentenced to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) for the offence under Section 452/34 IPC and thre...
Citigroup Inc. and Anr. Vs. Citicorp Business and Finance Pvt. Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1789/2013 CITIGROUP INC. AND ANR. Plaintiffs Through Mr. CM Lall, Adv. with Anuj Nair, Adv. versus CITICORP BUSINESS & FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ANR .Defendants Through Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. with Mr.A.K.De, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By this order, this Court proposes to decide the following applications: (i) I.A. 14886/2013 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. (ii) I.A. 6545/2014 under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC. (iii) I.A. 19385/2014 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. (iv) I.A. No.14888/2013 under Section 149 CPC.2. The present suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, passing off and unfair trade competition has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in respect trademarks CITI and CITICORP. Along with the suit, plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CP...
Ashok Kumar Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4536/2014 & CM90352014 ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda for Mr Yeeshu Jain for L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under t...
Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs. State Through: Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 334/2014 & Crl.M.A.16198/2014 SURYA KIRTI THAPAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. S.K. Thapar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: + .....Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. BAIL APPLN. 1039/2014 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH: GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH1 These are two applications filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in case FIR No.737/2007 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi. Since, both the applicati...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Discovery Communication India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~R-14,15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h November, 2014. + ITA12972010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA11012011 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA4892013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IV..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Revenue has filed these appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(Act, for short) relating to ...
Sparsh Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4622/2014 & CM91952014 SPARSH PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisitio...
Ashok Solomon Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4461/2014 ASHOK SOLOMON .... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan and Mr Vishal Maan, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Siddharth Panda, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, 18...
Sheshbir Alias Ajay Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1537/2011 SHESHBIR alias AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sheshbir @ Ajay has been convicted for the conspiracy to commit kidnapping and murder of Satish and destruction of evidence vide the impugned judgment dated July 16, 2011 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of `5,000/- for offence punishable under Section 302/120B IPC, Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years and a fine of `3,000/- for offence punishable under Sections 364/120B IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years and a fine of `2,000/for offence punishable under Sections 201/120B IPC. Charge sheet was filed agains...
Rohit @ Ranjan and Ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5343/2014 ROHIT @ RANJAN & ORS. Through .... Petitioners Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate with Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Sandeep Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18200/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5343/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.10/2010, registered under Section 498-A, 406 IPC at police station Shalimar Bagh, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. T...
Viacom 18 Media Private Ltd. and Anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:24. h November, 2014. + LPA3742013, CMs No.8716/2013 (for stay) & 3187/2014 (of respondent for condonation of 132 days delay in filing affidavit). VIACOM18MEDIA PRIVATE LTD. & ANR . .... Appellants Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Angad Singh Dugal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Ms. Aastha Jain and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 24th May, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.3402/2013 preferred by the appellant.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was filed impugning the order dated 17th May, 2013 of the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India, passed in exercise of powers conferred by Section 20(2) and (3...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »