Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abhishek Aggarwal Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~9 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5076/2014 VINOD KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with complainant in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 5067/2014 ABHISHEK AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with Sh. Sudhir Dhingra, Father / Attorney of the complainant Ms. Shivani Dhingra. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) These two matters have been filed under Section 482 ...
Government of the National Capital Territory of De Vs. M/S Munshi Ram ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + O.M.P. No.550/2011 GOVERNMENT OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Yogesh Saini, Adv. for Mr.V.K.Tandon, Adv. versus M/S MUNSHI RAM & ASSOCIATES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Risha Mittal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the Award dated 20th March, 2011 made and published by the sole Arbitrator whereby the respondent has been awarded a total sum of Rs.2,18,67,168/along with interest amounting to Rs.1,53,42,959/- up to 20th March, 2011 and future interest on Rs.3,72,10,127/- @ 12% per annum w.e.f. 21st March, 2011 till date of payment and the decision dated 20th March, 2011 of the sole Arbitrator rejecting the application moved by the petitioner under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2....
Dheeraj Vij and Ors. Vs. State of Dlehi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4454/2014 DHEERAJ VIJ & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. L. K. Verma and Mr. Dinakar Verma, Advocates with petitioners. versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. ASI Jagbir Singh. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.232/2013 on 01.07.2013, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Prahalad Pur, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, enters appearance and accepts notice. The second respondent, Smt. Swati, is present in person and accepts notice. She is identified by the Investigating Officer ASI Jagbir Singh.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the instance of the complainant as a result o...
Roshan Lal and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5321/2014 ROSHAN LAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rohit, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with WSI Saroj PS R.K. Puram. Mr. Faizal Naseem, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER2411.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406/494 IPC at Police Station R.K. Puram on 24th May, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Rekha are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer/ WSI Saroj, Police Station R.K. Puram.4. The aforesaid FIR is s...
Divine Mission Society (Regd.) Vs. National Counicl for Teacher Educat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents WITH + W.P.(C) 7422/2013 PRATAP COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondents WITH + W.P.(C) 7490/2013 RAO RAJ SINGH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondents WITH + W.P.(C) 7491/2013 RAM COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner versus + NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondents WITH W.P.(C) 7494/2013 ROYAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & MANAGEMENT ..... Petitioner versus + NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents WITH W.P.(C) 7495/2013 G.R. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents WITH + W.P.(C) 7516/2013 SUNRISE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION W.P.(C) 2889/2013 & connected matters...
Escorts Ltd Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Naresh Trehan Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Ajit Singh Chawla Vs. Rajinder Parshad Arora and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 3245/ 2014 AJIT SINGH CHAWLA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijayender Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Adv. and Mr. Sidharth Bhatia, Adv. versus RAJINDER PARSHAD ARORA AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through: % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL1 This suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants with the allegations that the Plaintiff is the lawful tenant and in possession of premises bearing No.44-A, Coronation Building, Om Bhawan, Chandni Chowk, Delhi110006. The premises are owned by Defendant No.3, which is a Public Limited Company.2. According to the Plaintiff, Defendant No.1 claims himself to be the owner of the suit premises on the basis of a Sale Deed dated 13.02.2008 executed by Defendant No.2, Managing Director of Defendant No.3 in favour of Defendant No.1. It is urged that Defendant No.3 never...
Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11 days delay in re-filing the appeal) DSJ COMMUNICATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao & Mr. Vikas Pathak, Advs. versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. Mr. Arun, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2411.2014 CM No.19263/2014 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. LPA No.757/2014 3. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 30th July, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.934/2010 preferred by the appellant. Though the appeal is accompanied with applications for condonation of 102 days delay in filing and 11 days delay in re-filing thereof and though we do not find any sufficient cause for con...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »