Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Prof. Ashok Kumar Keshari Vs. Manika Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:18. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 % + IA Nos.1742/2012 & 2193/2013 In CS(OS) 378/2011 DR. (PROF.) ASHOK KUMAR KESHARI ..... Plaintiff Versus MANIKA GUPTA AND ORS. .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Gurnani and Mr. Jai Singh, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Tripathy, Advocate for D-1 & 2 Mr. Dinesh Kr. Gutpa, Adv. For D-5, 7 & 8 Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. For D-6, 9 & 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J IA No.1742/2012 (u/O. 7 R. 11 CPC by D-1 &2) and IA No.2193/2013 (u/O. 7 R. 11 CPC by D-5, 7 &8) 1. Interlocutory application (IA) No.1742/2012 has been filed by defendant nos.1 and 2 while the other application, being: IA No.2193/2013 has been filed by defendant nos.5, 7 & 8. These are applications filed for seeking rejection of the plaint.2. The grounds articulated in the application are broadly as follows : First, that the suit filed...
Harjinder Pal Singh Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 118/ 2011 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: + Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. EX. P. 240/ 2013 HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.5652/ 2014 (O. XXI Rules 59, 91 & 92 CPC) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011 IA No.6423/ 2014 (Objections) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011, and EA (OS) No.288/ 2014 (Objections) in Ex. P. 240/ 2013 1. The three applications in the above stated suit and Execution Petition are taken up for disposal together as a common question of law and fact is involved in all the three applications moved by the applicant/ objector.2. CS (OS) No.171/2010 titled Harjinder Pal Si...
Karamjit Kaur Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.354/2014 & I.A. Nos.2332/2014, 9547/2014 & 11477/2014 KARAMJIT KAUR Through .....Plaintiff Ms.Amita Gupta Adv. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..Defendants Through Mr.Gautam Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction in respect of property bearing No.C-599 measuring 150 sq. yards forming part of Khasra No.23/1-2, situated within the revenue estate of Village Devli (now forming part of unauthorized colony C-Block, Sangam Vihar, Delhi) (hereinafter referred to as the suit property) against the defendants.2. When the suit was listed on the first date, the objection was raised by the defendant with regard to maintainability of the suit. In order to ensure that the suit is not infructuous, an assurance was given by the learned counsel for the defendants not to take precipitative action ...
Vinod Kumar Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~9 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5076/2014 VINOD KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with complainant in person. AND + CRL.M.C. 5067/2014 ABHISHEK AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Vijay Yadav, Sub Inspector Charan Singh and Sub Inspector Paramjit Singh, Spl. Staff. Mr. Ashraf Hasnain, Advocate with Sh. Sudhir Dhingra, Father / Attorney of the complainant Ms. Shivani Dhingra. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) These two matters have been filed under Section 482 ...
Manish Gupta Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5339/2014 MANISH GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Kamal Katyan, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. ASI Saroj Bala. Mr. S. D. Dixit, Advocate with respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18188/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5339/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.335/2013 registered under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC on 26.07.2013 at police station Maurya Enclave, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. S.D. Dixit, Advocate for Respondent No.2/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent, Ms. Ruchika Gupta, who is pr...
Karam Bir Vs. State of Nct Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5326/2014 KARAM BIR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Dahiya and Mr. L.K. Dahiya, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Satyabir Singh, PS North Rohini. Mr. Sandeep, Advocate for R-2 and 3 with R-2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 18133/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5326/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.790/2014 registered under Sections 341/323 IPC at Police Station North Rohini, New Delhi on 21st October, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf...
Sanjay Mehta and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4530/2014 & CM90262014 SANJAY MEHTA & ANR. .... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Sidharth Panda for Mr Yeeshu Jain. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Lan...
Amita Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4529/2014 & CM90252014 AMITA MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda for L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, ...
Shikha Vashishth Vs. Ranjana Taneja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order pronounced on: November 24, 2014 + I.A. No.613/2014 in CS(OS) No.879/2012 SHIKHA VASHISHTH Through ..... Plaintiff Ms.Jasmit Kaur, Adv. with Mr.S.K.Kalia, Adv. versus RANJANA TANEJA Through ..... Defendant Ms.Nidhi Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I shall dispose of the abovementioned pending application filed by the defendant under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the written statement.2. It is stated in the application that after filing the written statement in January, 2013, the defendant realized that a substantial error of facts has been unintentionally committed viz., that the suit property was purchased by the majority of funds of the defendant herself and some money was paid by her husband also. Besides, the other developments took place which are mentioned in para 1 of the application. The same read as under:(a) Despite the fact that Smt.Manju ...
Sunil Gupta Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 118/ 2011 SUNIL GUPTA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: + Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. EX. P. 240/ 2013 HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma, Adv. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Judgment Debtor Through: Mr. Manish Miglani, Adv. for Third Party Objector. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.5652/ 2014 (O. XXI Rules 59, 91 & 92 CPC) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011 IA No.6423/ 2014 (Objections) in CS (OS) No.118/ 2011, and EA (OS) No.288/ 2014 (Objections) in Ex. P. 240/ 2013 1. The three applications in the above stated suit and Execution Petition are taken up for disposal together as a common question of law and fact is involved in all the three applications moved by the applicant/ objector.2. CS (OS) No.171/2010 titled Harjinder Pal Si...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »