Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ihhr Hospitality ( andhra) Pvt Ltd Vs. Seema Swami and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order pronounced on: November 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.1450/2011 IHHR HOSPITALITY (ANDHRA) PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vineet Jhanji & Mr.Imran Moulaey, Advs. versus SEEMA SWAMI & ORS Through + ..... Defendants Mr.Anupam Srivastava, Adv. with Ms.Sharmistha Ghosh, Adv. for D-1 to 3, 6, 7 & 9 to 15. Mr.Sandeep Bisht, Adv. for D-17. Mr.Ajay Mehrotra, Adv. for D-30 along with Mr.Amit Kumar, Senior Executive, in person. Mr.Aditya Madan, Adv. for D-31. Mr.R.P.Vats, Adv. for D-32. Ms.Richa Oberoi, Adv. for Mr.Ateev Mathur, Adv. for D-33. Suit against D-4 & 5 already decreed vide order dated 22nd January, 2012. Defendant No.28 was deleted vide order dated 4th February, 2013. CS(OS) No.1466/2011 IHHR HOSPITALITY PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vineet Jhanji & Mr.Imran Moulaey, Advs. versus SEEMA SWAMI & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr.Anupam Srivastava, Adv. with Ms.Sharmistha Ghosh, ...
Ishwar Dayal Kansal Vs. Motion Pictures Association
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1954/2011 ISHWAR DAYAL KANSAL Through ..... Plaintiff Plaintiff in person versus MOTION PICTURES ASSOCIATION .....Defendant Through Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit for specific performance, declaration and permanent and mandatory injunction filed by the plaintiff against the defendant. The issues in the matter were framed vide order dated 28th April, 2014. Vide the same order it was also directed that issues No.1 and 2 be treated as preliminary issues.2. Submissions have been made by both the sides on issue No.2 which is whether the suit claim is within time?.3. It is the case of the plaintiff as stated in the plaint that the plaintiff in December, 1999 made an offer to the defendant to purchase the suit property, pursuant to the advertisements by the defendant in the newspapers ...
Kamaljeet Singh and Ors Vs. State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4218/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.14577/2014 KAMALJEET SINGH & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondents Through Ms.Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor with Sub Inspector Sukhvinder, P.S. Gandhi Nagar. Mr. R.K. Aggarwal, Advocate with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.10/2010 registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC on 10.01.2010 at police station Gandhi Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. R. K. Aggarwal, Advocate for Respondent No.2/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent, Smt. Gurvinder Kaur, who is present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer Sub Inspector ...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dijo Davis and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~A-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 155/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms.Suman Bagga and Mr.Saral Chaturvedi, Advocates. versus DIJO DAVIS & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CM No.2035/2014 (delay in re-filing) This is an application for condonaton of delay of 351 days in re-filing of the appeal. It is urged that certain objections were raised by the Registry and cross-objections were taken back by the counsel to remove the same but the cross-objections got misplaced in the office of the counsel for the appellant. This was found in December 2013 and the cross-objections were thereafter refiled. Hence, it is urged that the delay of 351 days in re-filing of the present cross-objections may be condoned. Subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- which will be payable by respondent No.1 to the Delhi High Court Bar...
Sanjay and Ors Vs. the State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 SANJAY & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. R. P. Bhardwaj, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. A.S.I. A. Kumar. Ms.Bharti Malik, Advocate with complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 4352/2014 & Crl.M.A. No.14934/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.274/2007, registered under Section 498-A/406/34 IPC at police station Adarsh Nagar on 19.05.2007, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State and Ms. Bharti Malik, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant, who is present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer, ASI A. Kumar.3. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the inst...
Abhinav Seth and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4035/2014 ABHINAV SETH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Anand, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Manohar Lal, PS Rajouri Garden. Mr. Raman Sahway, Advocate for R2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.12/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Rajouri Garden on 5th January, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Charika Seth are present in person and are identified by the Investigating Officer SI Manohar Lal, Police Station Rajour...
Shahid Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 811/2012 NOORUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CRL.A. 820/2012 SHAHID Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shafiullah, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Nooruddin and Shahid assail the judgment dated June 06, 2012 whereby they were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC for the murder of Ikramuddin and the order on sentence dated June 07, 2012 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5000/- each.2. The prosecution case rests on the testimony of two eye-witness...
Manoj Saxena Vs. Ashok Goel and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.295/2014 24th November , 2014 MANOJ SAXENA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Amitabh Narayan, Adv. VERSUS ASHOK GOEL & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19234/2014 (preponing of date by the petitioner) Application for preponement is allowed. CM stands disposed of. The next date i.e 16.12.2014 stands cancelled. CM(M) No.295/2014 1. The petitioner, who is the defendant no.2(ii) in the suit, has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order of the trial court dated 27.11.2013 by which the trial court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for amendment of the written statement to add a new para 5A as under:5A. That the notice dated 13th August, 1969 is illegal as it has not been issued on behalf of the HUF of...
Amb Talent Media Private Limited Vs. Amandeep S. Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + I.A. No.16913/2009 in CS(OS) No.2509/2009 AMB TALENT MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Adv. with Ms. Neha Reddy and Mr. Siddhant Advs. versus AMANDEEP S. KHURANA Through ....Defendant Defendant already ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, misappropriation of trade secrets/ confidential information, malicious falsehood and for damages, rendition of accounts of profits, delivery up etc. against the defendant.2. The plaintiff is a private limited Company which was incorporated in March 2009 with the objective inter alia of carrying on talent searches, promoting such talent and providing work opportunities and coaching of people in various art forms.3. Mr. Preet Kanwar Singh Bedi is one of the Directors of the plaintiff and has a long and ric...
NooruddIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 811/2012 NOORUDDIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.M.Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CRL.A. 820/2012 SHAHID Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shafiullah, Adv. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Nooruddin and Shahid assail the judgment dated June 06, 2012 whereby they were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC for the murder of Ikramuddin and the order on sentence dated June 07, 2012 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5000/- each.2. The prosecution case rests on the testimony of two eye-witness...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »