Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay @ Vicky Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 20, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1151/2010 SANJAY @ VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Anurag Jain, Mr.Vivek Sood, Ms.Janhavi Mahana and Mr.Jaydeep Tandon, Advocates. Appellant produced from custody. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Dheeraj Singh, PS Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sanjay @ Vicky is convicted for the murder of his wife vide the impugned judgment dated August 18, 2010 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `20,000/- vide the impugned order dated August 27, 2010.2. Learned counsel for the appellant assailing the judgment contends that the testimony of PW-2 Smt.Sudama is not sufficient to convict the appellant as according to her she had seen the appellant along with the deceased at 11.00 PM on October...
Viacom 18 Media Private Ltd. and Anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:24. h November, 2014. + LPA3742013, CMs No.8716/2013 (for stay) & 3187/2014 (of respondent for condonation of 132 days delay in filing affidavit). VIACOM18MEDIA PRIVATE LTD. & ANR . .... Appellants Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Angad Singh Dugal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Ms. Aastha Jain and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 24th May, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.3402/2013 preferred by the appellant.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was filed impugning the order dated 17th May, 2013 of the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India, passed in exercise of powers conferred by Section 20(2) and (3...
Rohit @ Ranjan and Ors. Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5343/2014 ROHIT @ RANJAN & ORS. Through .... Petitioners Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate with Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Sandeep Kumar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.18200/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5343/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.10/2010, registered under Section 498-A, 406 IPC at police station Shalimar Bagh, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. R. K. Hooda, Advocate for the second respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. T...
Sparsh Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4622/2014 & CM91952014 SPARSH PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisitio...
Ashok Solomon Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4461/2014 ASHOK SOLOMON .... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan and Mr Vishal Maan, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Siddharth Panda, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, 18...
Sheshbir Alias Ajay Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 19, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 24, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1537/2011 SHESHBIR alias AJAY Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Sheshbir @ Ajay has been convicted for the conspiracy to commit kidnapping and murder of Satish and destruction of evidence vide the impugned judgment dated July 16, 2011 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of `5,000/- for offence punishable under Section 302/120B IPC, Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years and a fine of `3,000/- for offence punishable under Sections 364/120B IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years and a fine of `2,000/for offence punishable under Sections 201/120B IPC. Charge sheet was filed agains...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jubilant offshore Drilling Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA6942014 Date of decision:24. h November, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Advocate. versus JUBILANT OFFSHORE DRILLING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue relates to Assessment Year 2008-09 and impugns the order dated 14th February, 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in the case of M/s. Jubilant Offshore Drilling Private Limited.2. We have examined the assessment order, but it is difficult to appreciate and accept the logic and reasoning of the Assessing Officer to hold that the business of the assessee had not been set up and, therefore, expenditure of Rs.1,69,72,374/- should be treated as pre-operative expenses. The said expenditure was accordingly disall...
Jagmal Vs. Ramesh Chand Aggarwal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:24. h November, 2014 + CS (OS) 735/ 2011 JAGMAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Adv. versus RAMESH CHAND AGGARWAL AND ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Aditya Chandra, Adv. for D-1 and D-10. Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Adv. with Mr. Anupriya Singh, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Adv. for D-7, 8, 9, 11 and 12. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL IA No.9211/ 2011 (Order VII Rule 11 CPC) in CS (OS) 735/ 2011 1. By virtue of this application, Defendant No.2 lays challenge to the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the present civil suit. The contention raised by the Plaintiff is that for the purpose of deciding maintainability of the suit, only the pleadings in the suit are to be considered. In the plaint, the Plaintiff has himself claimed that the land, the subject matter of the suit is an agricultural land covered by the provisions of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 (the Act of 1954).2. This suit for permanent injunction ...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Meenakshi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.62 /2014 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Manish Kaushik for Mr. K. L. Nandwani, Advocate. Versus SMT. MEENAKSHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company has assailed the award dated 20.09.2013, whereby keeping in view the age of the deceased that is 21 years on the date of accident, i.e., 01.03.2009, the learned Tribunal while granting compensation has added 50% in his actual income towards future prospects.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company submits that as the respondents/claimants have failed to prove that deceased Rajesh Kumar was in regular employment and the learned Tribunal keeping in mind the provisions of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, has considered the salary of the deceased...
M/S Continental Construction Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~5, 6 & 96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 8075/2014 & 8077/2014 Date of decision:24. h November, 2014 M/S CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. S.L. Gupta & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.8138/2014 M.S. BASI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. H.L. Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bhowmik Nayyar & Mr. Amit Dhupar, Advocate. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.L. Gupta & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates for SBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Counsel for the petitioners have been informed that wife of one of us (Sanjiv Khanna, J.) is holder of some shares of the State Bank of India. Counsel for the petitioners state that they have no objection to the present Bench hearing these writ petitions.2. The only issue an...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »