Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs. State Through: Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 334/2014 & Crl.M.A.16198/2014 SURYA KIRTI THAPAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. S.K. Thapar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: + .....Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. BAIL APPLN. 1039/2014 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH: GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH1 These are two applications filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in case FIR No.737/2007 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi. Since, both the applicati...
Citigroup Inc. and Anr. Vs. Citicorp Business and Finance Pvt. Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1789/2013 CITIGROUP INC. AND ANR. Plaintiffs Through Mr. CM Lall, Adv. with Anuj Nair, Adv. versus CITICORP BUSINESS & FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ANR .Defendants Through Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. with Mr.A.K.De, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By this order, this Court proposes to decide the following applications: (i) I.A. 14886/2013 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. (ii) I.A. 6545/2014 under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC. (iii) I.A. 19385/2014 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. (iv) I.A. No.14888/2013 under Section 149 CPC.2. The present suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, passing off and unfair trade competition has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in respect trademarks CITI and CITICORP. Along with the suit, plaintiffs also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CP...
Ashok Kumar Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4536/2014 & CM90352014 ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda for Mr Yeeshu Jain for L&B. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under t...
Laxmi Narayan @ Lambu Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 851 of 2010 LAXMI NARAYAN @ LAMBU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. And CRL.A. 853 of 2010 DEVENDER @ RAMU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Pandey, Advocate along with Appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER2411.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 19th May 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 (ASJ) (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Session Case No.38/09 convicting the Appellants, Laxmi Narain @ Lambu and Devender @ Ramu, for the offences under Sections 452 read with 34 IPC and Sections 308/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 21 st May 2010 whereby each of them was sentenced to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) for the offence under Section 452/34 IPC and thre...
Balasubramanian Ramachandran Vs. Income Tax officer Ward 8
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6159/2013 & CM135492013 BALASUBRAMANIAN RAMACHANDRAN ..... Petitioner versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD8..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Deepak Chopra with Mr Amit Srivastava For the Respondents : Mr Kamal Sawhney with Mr Sanjay Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), which was issued to the petitioner on 28.03.2012 seeking to re-open the assessment which had been completed under Section 143(3) of the said Act on 30.11.2007 in respect of the assessment year 2005-06.2. It is evident that the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Consequently, the first proviso to ...
Surya Kirti Thapar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 334/2014 & Crl.M.A.16198/2014 SURYA KIRTI THAPAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. S.K. Thapar, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: + .....Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. BAIL APPLN. 1039/2014 VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH: GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Gazi, APP for the State with Inspector A.K. Singh, P.S. EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH1 These are two applications filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) seeking regular bail in case FIR No.737/2007 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at P.S. Connaught Place, New Delhi. Since, both the applicati...
Shri Iresh Duggal Vs. Shri Virender Kumar Seth and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 551/2010 24th November, 2014 % SHRI IRESH DUGGAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocate. VERSUS SHRI VIRENDER KUMAR SETH & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 16.5.2009 by which the trial court has rejected the prayer made by the decree holder/plaintiff for division of the tenanted premises in the ratio of 1/3rd for each of the parties to the suit in terms of the preliminary decree dated 25.9.2004 passed in a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts. The tenanted premises are property no.18/39, Gali no.5, New Rohtak Road, Sarai Rohilla, Delhi.2. The decree holder/plaintiff had filed the subject suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts, and in ...
Vir Bala Mehta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~ 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4533/2014 & CM90302014 VIR BALA MEHTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sumit Bansal For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Ms Hanupaii for R-1. Mr Siddharth Panda Mr Arjun Pant for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (h...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Discovery Communication India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~R-14,15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h November, 2014. + ITA12972010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA11012011 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA4892013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IV..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Revenue has filed these appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(Act, for short) relating to ...
Rajan Nanda Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »