Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Iv Vs. M/S Interarch Building Product
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h November, 2014 + ITA No.54/2003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S INTERARCH BUILDING PRODUCT ..... Respondent Through Mr. M.P. Rastogi and Mr. K.N. Ahuja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) pertains to assessment year 1994-95 and was admitted for hearing by order dated 10th May, 2005, on the following substantial question of law:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that service charges of Rs.2,20,500/- to be recovered from M/s Interach are to be included in the profits of industrial undertaking for computing deduction u/s 80-I of the Act (wrongly mentioned by the ITAT as u/s 80HHC)?.2. It is not disputed...
Future General India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Santosh Kumari and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 80/2013 FUTURE GENERAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant Through: Ms.Suman Bagga with Mr.Saral Chaturvedi, Advocate versus SANTOSH KUMARI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit K.Pandey, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 6th November, 2012.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 17th October, 2010, number of persons had gone to watch the burning of effigies of Ravan on the Dussehra festival. They watched the mela at Nehru Place and sat in the Champion vehicle. When the vehicle reached Crown Plaza Hotel Today, it overturned due to the rash and negligent driving of the vehicle. One of the occupants, namely, Jagdish Lal expired. Three others were injured. Hence, four claim petitions were filed. I am dealing with the portion of the...
Hari Prakash Gulia Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:25thNovember, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 716/2014 HARI PRAKASH GULIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Singh & Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State. Mr. P.K. Malik, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against order dated 25.09.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-03 (Central), Delhi whereby the revision petition was dismissed.2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are that respondent No.2 filed a complaint on the allegations, inter alia, that he is running business of selling lottery ticket on partnership basis at Stall No.1, U.P. Roadways Bus Stand, Ajmeri Gate, Delhi 110006 for the last more than 15 years. The said stal...
Madan Mohan Singh and anr Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
32 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:25. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6405/2014 & CM154002014 MADAN MOHAN SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR AND ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Ashish Mohan. For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B. Mr Pawan Mathur for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over by Mr Jain, the learned counsel for the Land Acquisition Collector, is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file a rejoinder affidavit.2. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that this matter is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Girish Chhabra v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.: W.P.(C) 2759/2011 decided on 12.09.2014. He states that although possession of the subject land has been taken, the aw...
Manoj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. 11.2014 Pronounced on :25. 11.2014 % + CRL.A. 23/2006 MANOJ Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The Appellant Manoj has been convicted by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.33/2002 in FIR No.361/2002 under Sections 376/452/506/342/323 IPC, PS Hauz Khas for committing the offence punishable under Sections 451/342/376/506 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for one year with fine of Rs.500 and in default to undergo SI for one week for committing the offence punishable under Section 451 IPC, to undergo RI for six month for committing the offence punishable under Section 342 IPC, to undergo RI for seven years with fine of Rs.5000/- and in default to undergo SI for six months for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and to undergo RI for two...
Aaa Portfolio Pvt Ltd and Anr. Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Justice for All Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.4607 /2013 JUSTICE FOR ALL Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Khagesh K. Jha, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. D. Ray Chaudhary & Ms. Arpita, Advs. for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This appeal under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), flags the issue of allottees of land for the purpose of establishing a nursery school / play school / crches thereon, on the condition of admitting students belonging to weaker sections of the society to the extent of 25% and grant of freeship to them, after being put into possession of the said land not abiding by the said condition and the respondents Director of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) and Delhi Development Authority (DDA) not only not taking any action wit...
Cpio Cum Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011 NARESH TREHAN ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 251/2010 & CM No.526/2010 AAA PORTFOLIO PVT LTD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 206/2010 & CM No.392/2010 ESCORTS LTD ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 214/2010 & CM No.445/2010 CPIO CUM ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 202/2010 & 389/2010 ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE W.P.(C) Nos. 85/2010 & other connected matters versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent AND + W.P.(C) 207/2010 & CM No.394/2010 RAJAN NANDA ..... Petitioner versus RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Manjira Dasgupta in...
Perpetuuiti Technosoft Service Pvt Ltd Vs. Sanovi Technologies (India) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h November, 2014 % + I.A. No.13122/2013 in CS(OS) No.1618/2013 PERPETUUITI TECHNOSOFT SERVICE PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.C.M.Lall, Adv. with Ms.Nancy Roy, Adv. versus SANOVI TECHNOLOGIES (INIDA) PVT LTD & ANOTHER ..... Defendants Through Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vaibhav Vutts, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the abovementioned pending application being I.A. No.13122/2013 filed by the applicant/plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC.2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against defendants for damages for tortuous acts of unlawful interference with contracts and business relations worth Rs. 1 crore and permanent injunction restraining defendants from sending letters/notices to the clients and potential clients of the plaintiff.3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff, a company inco...
Manish Dahiya and Ors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4533/2014 MANISH DAHIYA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. J.K. Bhola, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Abha Singh, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Brij Pal Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.15525/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4533/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.216/2011, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC on 22.12.2011 at police station Prasad Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Abha Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.2/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent, Smt. Madhu, who is pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »