Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Amar Photo Studio Thr. Raj Kumar Vs. Late Sh. Niranjan Das Arora T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RC. REV. No.229/2014 13th November , 2014 M/S AMAR PHOTO STUDIO THR. RAJ KUMAR ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Adv. and Mr. Amritansh Batheja, Adv. VERSUS LATE SH. NIRANJAN DAS ARORA THR. ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE SMT. MANJU ARORA ...... Respondent Through: Ms. Pooja Chhabra, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. On 14.7.2014, this Court passed the following order:C.M.No.11056/2014 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. RC.REV.No.229/2014 & C.M.No.11057/2014 (stay) 1. Subject to the payment of costs of Rs.35,000/- to the respondent herein/landlord before the Court below in the form of bank draft within a period of two weeks from today, on account of delay being caused in the disposal of the leave to defend application, which is stated to be on account of the default of the present petitioner/his advocate,...
D.G., I.C.M.R. & Anr. Vs. R.C.Verma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:13. 11.2014 % W.P.(C.) No.5710/2001 D.G., I.C.M.R. & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate. versus R.C.VERMA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and Union of India (UOI) have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 17.05.2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in T.A. No.2/1999 preferred by the respondents/applicants. The Tribunal has allowed the said application and directed the petitioner to consider the application of Integrated Recruitment & Assessment Scheme (IRAS) to the technical staff of the petitioner ICMR notionally from the date when the same was made applicable to the scientific staff of ICMR. The Tribuna...
Navy Children School Vs. Director of Education and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
24 to 30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) W.P.(C) 7413/2014 7416/2014 7426/2014 7429/2014 7430/2014 7431/2014 7437/2014 & & & & & & & CM CM CM CM CM CM CM No.17604/2014 No.17607/2014 No.17621/2014 No.17625/2014 No.17626/2014 No.17627/2014 No.17634/2014 Date of decision:13. 11.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: NAVY CHILDREN SCHOOL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kaushik, Advocate for Ms. Shilpa Singh, Advocate versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 & 2 with Mr. Nagar, DEO, Zone-26. Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate for R-3. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. Ms. Indrani Ghosh, learned counsel, who had appeared for the respondents No.3 in the earlier round of litigation, states that she has instructions to appear for the respondents No.3 in the present cases as well. She submits that she shall file her power of attorney within one week. A complete set of the pape...
Sh.Dharam Chand Vs. Chairman, Ndmc and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. 09.2014 Date of Decision:13. 11.2014 + LPA No.675/2014 SH.DHARAM CHAND Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Tripurari Ray & Mr. Rajinder Singh, Advs. versus CHAIRMAN, NDMC & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Additional Standing Counsel for R-1 & 2. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This appeal impugns the judgment dated 22nd September, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the appellants challenge is to the NDMCs order dated 03.12.2013. The said order had relocated the appellant from his existing vending site outside the Supreme Court of India to a site near the gate of Baroda House, adjacent to the existing stalls, due to security reasons. The learned __________________________________________________________________ Single Judge was of the view that...
Makisu Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 535 of 2008 MOHD. ISAF (IN J.C.) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate With CRL.A. 691 of 2008 MAKISU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate With CRL.A. 576 of 2008 IRFAN ALI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1311.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 21st May 2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting the Appellants for the offence under Sections 328/354/380/506/34 IPC, and additionally convicting the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.(Crl.A.No). 691/2008, f...
Union of India Vs. Mahender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:13. 11.2014 + W.P. (C) 12289/2009 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Advocate. versus MAHENDER SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The Union of India is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 6.11.2008 in OA7872008. By the impugned order, the CAT had directed the Union to strike off/quash column nos.9 & 12 of the Recruitment Rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India in 2005, in respect of the category of Laboratory Assistants to the extent they are applicable to 50% promotional quota.2. The facts necessary for deciding this case are that the respondents/applicants were working as group D employees; they are 30 in number. They underwent the one year service training course from the Safdarjung Hospi...
Naresh Kharab Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h November, 2014 BAIL APPLN. 1660/2014 NARESH KHARAB Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate and Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Mr. Narendra Goyal and Mr. Priyesh Mishra, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Special Public Prosecutor for the State with Mr. S.K. Jha Investigating Officer and Mr. Pulkit Misra, Advocate. + BAIL APPLN. 1922/2014 NITIN SINHA @ NITIN SINGH @ NITIN BIHARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Vipin K. Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Special Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI SK Jha, PS EOW/Crime Branch + BAIL APPLN. 1923/2014 NITIN SINHA @ NITIN SINGH @ NITIN BIHARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Vipin K. Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Special Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI SK Jha, PS EO...
W.N.Gujral Vs. Smt. Kavita Chhibber
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 651/2014 % 13th November , 2014 W.N.GUJRAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.I.D.Tyagi with Mr.Milan Tyagi, Advocates. versus SMT. KAVITA CHHIBBER Through: ..... Respondent Dr.Chaudhary Shamsuddin Khan with Ms.Pushpa Chibger, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1 The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 10.5.2014 by which the trial court has rejected an application under Order XII Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by the petitioner/plaintiff in a suit for possession. The subject suit for possession was filed by the petitioner/plaintiff stating that there is a relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, rate of rent is more than Rs.3,500/- per month that is Rs.10,000/- per month, and the monthly tenancy was terminated by a legal notice dated 4.10.2013 sent under...
Uoi Vs. Mukul Gaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1622013 and CM Appl. No.5498/2013 Decided on 13th November, 2014 ..... Appellant UOI Through :Ms. Rashmi Malhotra and Ms. Priyanka Bharihoke, Advs. versus MUKUL GAUR ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Rupika Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Respondent, through his father, filed an application under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (the Act, for short) before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi seeking compensation of `4,00,000/- from the appellant in respect of the injuries suffered by him in an accident relating to 2DPM passenger train on 15th November, 2009 at about 7:30 pm at Azadpur railway station. At the time of filing of petition appellant was a minor. During pendency of the petition, respondent attained the age of majority and continued to pursue the matter. After the trial, Tribunal has awarded compensation of `2,40,000/- to respondent together with interest @ 9% per ann...
Pushpendra Mohan Dhingra Vs. Govt. Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h November, 2014 + W.P. (C) 119/2011 PUSHPENDRA MOHAN DHINGRA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pradhuman Gautam and Mr. Saumitra Singhal, Advs. Versus GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ORS Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondents SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner / Management seeks setting aside of the order dated 12/13.11.2009 passed by the Authority under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954.2. Also seeks setting aside of order dated 24.04.2008 and order dated 04.08.2010 passed by respondent No.1, thereby dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte orders dated 24.04.2008 and 12/13.11.2009.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 5 / workmen were not their employees. The alleged notice was served upon the petitioner by affixing at his residence at C-206, DDA Flat...
- ‹ Prev
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- Next ›
- Last »