Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Vs. Vice Chancellor, Rasthriya Sanskrit Sansthan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
1, 11, 12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6998, 6999, 7004/2013 & 7554/2014 Decided on :13. 11.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF ASHOK KUMAR in WP(C) SURESH KUMAR in WP(C) PRADEEP RAJPAL in WP(C) ANITA NEGI & ORS. in WP(C) ..... Petitioner No.6998/2013 ..... Petitioner No.6999/2013 ..... Petitioner No.7004/2013 ..... Petitioners No.7554/2014 Through : Mr. R.M.Tewari & Ms.Jyoti Tewari, Advocates for petitioners in WP No.6998 & 6999/2013 Ms.Rachna Aggarwal, Advocate for petitioner in WP(C) No.7004/2013 Mr.Shivam Singh, Advocate for petitioners in WP(C) No.7554/2014 versus VICE CHANCELLOR, RASTHRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN & ANR. Respondents Through : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Advocate Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for Ministry of Human Resources Development CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondent/Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan(hereinafter referred to as `the ...
Sh.Dharam Chand Vs. Chairman, Ndmc & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. 09.2014 Date of Decision:13. 11.2014 + LPA No.675/2014 SH.DHARAM CHAND Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Tripurari Ray & Mr. Rajinder Singh, Advs. versus CHAIRMAN, NDMC & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Additional Standing Counsel for R-1 & 2. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This appeal impugns the judgment dated 22nd September, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the appellants challenge is to the NDMCs order dated 03.12.2013. The said order had relocated the appellant from his existing vending site outside the Supreme Court of India to a site near the gate of Baroda House, adjacent to the existing stalls, due to security reasons. The learned __________________________________________________________________ Single Judge was of the view that...
Arvind Singhal and Ors. Vs. Leela Ram and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~R-10 & R-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 400/2006 ARVIND SINGHAL AND ORS. ..... Appellant Through Ms.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus LEELA RAM AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.L.Gupta and Mr.Ram Ashray, Advocates for R-3/Insurance Company + MAC.APP. 404/2006 ARVIND SINGHAL ..... Appellant Through Ms.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus LEELA RAM AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.L.Gupta and Mr.Ram Ashray, Advocates for R-3/Insurance Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present order I shall dispose of MAC.APP.No.400/2006 and 404/2006. Both arise out of a common Award and pertain to the same accident and to members of the same family.2. I will first take up MAC.APP.400/2006. It pertains to claim petition No.496/2003 pertaining to the death of Smt. Gunjan Singhal.3. The brief facts which led to the filing of the claim petition are that the appellant No.1 who is the husband of deceased G...
Goverdhan Dass & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h November, 2014 + LA.APP. 790/2006 GOVERDHAN DASS & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.K.Rout & Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocates for UoI/LAC LA.APP. 46/2010 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocates for UoI/LAC versus GOVERDHAN DASS & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K.Rout & Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (Oral) With the consent of both sides, the above-captioned two appeals were heard together as they are directed against common impugned judgment of 29th April, 2006 and are being disposed of by this common LA.APP. Nos. 790/2006 & 46/2010 Page 1 judgment. For the planned development of Delhi, land of appellantsGoverdhan Dass & Murli Manohar, situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Mohd. Pur, Munirka, Delhi w...
State Vs. Radhey Shyam @ Radhey
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :13. h November, 2014 % + CRL.L.P. 202/2011 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State with SI Roshan Lal PS Nangloi versus RAHDEY SHYAM @ RADHEY Through : None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.4970/2011 (Condonation of delay) 1. This is an application moved on behalf of the State/Petitioner praying for condonation of delay of 300 days in filing the present leave petition.2. For the reasons given in the application, the delay in filing the present leave petition is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. Crl.L.P. No.202/2011 1. Being aggrieved by the acquittal of the Respondent/Accused Radhey Shyam @ Radhey in Sessions Case No.117/08, FIR No.666/2007, under Section 363 IPC (Sections 366/376 IPC added later on), P.S.Nangloi, Delhi, the State is seeking leave to appeal under Section 378 (3) Cr.P.C. against the judgment/order dat...
Irfan Ali Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 535 of 2008 MOHD. ISAF (IN J.C.) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate With CRL.A. 691 of 2008 MAKISU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate With CRL.A. 576 of 2008 IRFAN ALI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sheikh Imran Alam and Mr. Usman Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1311.2014 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 21st May 2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting the Appellants for the offence under Sections 328/354/380/506/34 IPC, and additionally convicting the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.(Crl.A.No). 691/2008, f...
Pushpendra Mohan Dhingra Vs. Govt. Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:13. h November, 2014 + W.P. (C) 119/2011 PUSHPENDRA MOHAN DHINGRA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pradhuman Gautam and Mr. Saumitra Singhal, Advs. Versus GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ORS Represented by: NEMO. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ..... Respondents SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner / Management seeks setting aside of the order dated 12/13.11.2009 passed by the Authority under the Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954.2. Also seeks setting aside of order dated 24.04.2008 and order dated 04.08.2010 passed by respondent No.1, thereby dismissing the application filed by the petitioner for setting aside the ex-parte orders dated 24.04.2008 and 12/13.11.2009.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 5 / workmen were not their employees. The alleged notice was served upon the petitioner by affixing at his residence at C-206, DDA Flat...
NitIn Sethi Vs. Rajiv Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:13. 11.2014 + ARB.P. 102/2006 NITIN SETHI ..... Petitioner versus RAJIV MEHTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the petitioner: Mr Himal Akhtar & Mr Sunny Kadiyan, Advs. For the respondent: Mr Ashish Aggarwal, Mr Ashish Virmani, Mr Misba Huddin Siddiqui & Ms Kritika Khanijo, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 The petitioner in this case seeks appointment of an arbitrator in respect of disputes articulated in the petition. Peculiarly, the petition was not filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), but was filed under Section 7 & 8 of the said Act, and that too with the District Judge at the Tis Hazari Court, New Delhi. 1.1 The prayer made in the original petition was to the effect that the respondent should be injuncted from selling and/or alienating the shares in question, as detailed out in paragraph 10 of the petiti...
Smt. Baljit Kaur Vs. Shri Yogesh Kumar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1194/2009 Date of decision :13th November, 2014 % SMT. BALJIT KAUR Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms.Kamlakshi, Advocate versus SHRI YOGESH KUMAR AND ANR. ..... Defendant Through: Ms.Sapna Sinha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) IA.5826/2014 1. This is an application for condonation of 5 days delay in filing the OA.No.47/2014.2. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the OA is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. OA.No.47/2014 4. This is an appeal in Chamber filed against the order of the Joint Registrar dated 20.2.2014 by which right of the defendant to file written statement was closed. Counsel for the appellant submits that the only ground on which the applicant relies for not filing the written statement is oversight.5. I have perused the order of learned Joint Registrar dated 20.2.2014, in which the learned Joint Registrar has noticed...
Delhi Power Supply Company Ltd. (Dt. Ltd.) Vs. M/S Hindustan Vidyut Pr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P.No.72/2012 13th November, 2014 % DELHI POWER SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. (DT. LTD.) ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Ms.Latika Chaudhary and Ms.Gunjan Bansal, Advocates. versus M/S HINDUSTAN VIDYUT PRODUCTS LIMITED Through None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. ..... Respondent Yes. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Challenge by means of this petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1980 (CPC) is to the impugned order of the trial court dated 29.5.2004 by which the trial court dismissed the application under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC filed by the petitioner/defendant. By the application under Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC, the petitioner/defendant prayed for setting aside of the judgment and decree dated 07.4.2003 which was passed in default of non-filing of appearance within 10 days as required under Order XXXVII CPC.2. A reading of the impugned order shows that the trial cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- Next ›
- Last »