Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sapna Vs. Mukesh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. No.523/2012 & CM Nos. 18103/12, 4751/14 & 7833/14 14th November , 2014 % SAPNA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. D.K.Rustogi, Mr. B.S.Bagga and Mr. Ishaan Saraswat, Advocates. VERSUS MUKESH GUPTA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi and Mr. F.Hasan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25 B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Rent Controller (RC) dated 2.5.2012 by which the Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the suit premises RCR5232012 being the front side portion of the shop Page 1 of 9 no.3, Gandhi Market, Mirdard Road...
Om Fincap Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-iii, and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7639/2014 & CM180042014 OM FINCAP PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7640/2014 & CM180062014 PAWAN KUMAR DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7642/2014 & CM180202014 OM PRAKASH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII, & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Salil Kapoor with Mr Vikas Jain For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions arise out of common sequence of events and are, therefore, being disposed of together, the main writ petition being WP(C) 7642/2014 (Om Prakash Dhingra v. CIT and Others). In that petition, there is a prayer for ...
Mukesh W/O Lt. Dilbagh Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.3743/2013 Date of decision:14. h November, 2014 MUKESH W/O LT. DILBAGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of this petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner seeks direction for running the sentences pronounced in FIR No.575/2008 registered at P.S. Sultanpuri and FIR No.150/2009 registered at P.S. Sultanpuri (Crime Branch) concurrently.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 368 IPC in case FIR No.575/2008 and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand). In case of default in payment of fine the petitioner was to undergo further imprisonment fo...
Sh. Madan Lal Vs. Sh. Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.1132/2013 14th November, 2014 % SH. MADAN LAL Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Gupta with Mr.Harpreet Singh, Advocates. VERSUS SH. ASHOK KUMAR ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/tenant impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Additional Rent Controller dated 01.4.2013 and the Rent Control Tribunal/first appellate court dated 28.9.2013; which have passed an eviction decree against the petitioner/tenant under Section 14(1)(j) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground that the petitioner/tenant failed to repair the damage caused to the tenanted premises within the period of 30 days granted as per Section 14(10) of the Act, by the judgment dated 01.8.2011.2. The judgment dated 01.8...
M/S. Texcel Infotech (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Nct and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h November, 2014 + CRL. M.C. 1169/2013 M/S. TEXCEL INFOTECH (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Ashok Anand with Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar and Mr. Shwetank Sailakwal, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State. Mr. Upinder Dhindsa, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against summoning order dated 30.07.2012 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in CC No.472/12 titled as Anil Khosla vs. Texcel Infotech (P) Ltd..2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the respondent No.2/ complainant filed complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as NI Act) against the petitioner on the allegations, inter alia, that the petitione...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Rehana and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~A-60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14.11.2014 + MAC.APP. 1027/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus REHANA & ORS ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.18521/2014(exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. MAC.APP. 1027/2014 and CM No.18520/2014 (stay) 1. By the present appeal the appellant Insurance Company seeks to impugn the Award dated 11.07.2014.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 24.01.2009 the claimant along with her family was going to Mussorie from Delhi in a Honda City car. When the car reached at Bikaner Wala Chowk, Link Road, Ghaziabad, it was hit by a bus. Respondent No.1 and other occupants of the car suffered injuries.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded the following compensation to respondent No.1:- Medicines and Medical treatment Future Treatment Pain and suffering Loss of amenities of l...
Rasheed Masood Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. 11.2014 + CRL.A. 1325/2013 RASHEED MASOOD Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Asgar Khan and Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocates versus CBI Through + CRL.A. 1326/2013 RASHEED MASOOD Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing counsel for CBI ..... Appellant Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Asgar Khan and Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocates versus CBI Through + CRL.A. 1329/2013 RASHEED MASOOD Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing counsel for CBI ..... Appellant Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Asgar Khan and Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocates versus CBI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing counsel for CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA ORDER : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Crl. M.B. No.10353/2014 in CRL.A. 1325/2013 Crl. M.B. No.10352/2014 in CRL.A. 1326/2013 & Crl. M.B. No.10349/2014 in CRL.A. 1329/2013 1. The appellant Rasheed Masood seeks suspension of senten...
Pj Pothen and anr Vs. Sanghamitra ( Cghs) Society and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3512014 Decided on 14th November, 2014 PJ POTHEN AND ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. Versus SANGHAMITRA ( CGHS) SOCIETY AND ORS..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) CM No.18671/2014 (Delay) For the reasons explained in the application delay of 13 days in refiling is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM No.18670/2014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. FAO3512014 1. Appellants filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act) before the trial court for grant of succession certificate in respect of estate of Late Rev. Fr. P.J.Gregory Paruvaparambil. It was alleged that deceased died in a hospital in Cochin, within the state of Kerala on 2nd July, 2008 at the age of 69. Deceased was unmarried. Appellants were brother and sister of deceased, who was ...
Ranjit Kumar Jha Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.7812/2014 Decided on :14. h November, 2014 RANJIT KUMAR JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Chetan Wahi & Ms. Mehak, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.18338/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to the deficiency being rectified. The application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.7812/2014 & C.M. No.18337/2014 (for stay) 1. Issue notice of the writ petition as well as the stay application. Mr. Jagjit Singh, the learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents on the question of grant of stay. In the instant case, the legality and the validity of the order dated 29.10.2014 has been challenged by the petitioner on account of the fact that the same is in violation of the principles of nat...
M/S Maja Health Care Division Vs. M/S Trance International and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 99/2013 % Judgment reserved on 16.7.2014 Judgment pronounced on November 14, 2014 M/S MAJA HEALTH CARE DIVISION ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Neeraj Grover and Ms.Meghna Chandra, Advs. versus M/S TRANCE INTERNATIONAL & ANR ..... Defendants Through : Mr.H.P. Singh and Mr.Navroop Singh Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J I.A.907/2013 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trade mark, passing off, delivery up and rendition of accounts of profits.2. Summons in the suit and notice in I.A.907/2013 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC were directed to be issued on 21.1.2013. While issuing summons in the suit on 21.1.2013, the Court passed a partial ex parte ad interim injunction order restraining the defendants from selling perfumes, deodorants, cosmetics, etc. under the mark Velvet COBRA. It may be noticed that on 21.1.2013 counsel for the plaintiff ...
- ‹ Prev
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- Next ›
- Last »