Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 9 of about 220 results (0.048 seconds)Shivji Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : October 29, 2014 + CRL.A. 1153/2014 SHIVJI SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rahul Tyagi, Mr.VVP Singh, Mr.Sandeep Singh, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Insp. Vijay Kumar PS Mandawali. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Shivji Singh impugns the judgment dated April 29, 2014 by which he is convicted for the offence of murder of Ms.Neha and the order on sentence dated May 02, 2014 by which he has been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the husband/fiance of the deceased Amar Singh who was a material witness has not been examined. No date has been mentioned in the seizure memo of the pant and shirt allegedly seized from the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Vs. Sunita Bansal and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ A-3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29th October, 2014 + MAC.APP. 339/2007 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY ..... Appellant Through Mr.Kamaldeep Gaur, Advocate. versus SUNITA BANSAL & ORS. Through + ..... Respondents Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate for R-1 to 6. MAC.APP. 508/2007 SUNITA BANSAL & ORS. Through ..... Appellants Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Kamaldeep Gaur, Advocate for Ins.Co. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. MAC. APP. 339/07 is filed by the appellant Insurance Company seeking to impugn the Award dated 13.04.2007. MAC. APP. 508/2007 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation.2. The brief facts giving rise to the claim petition is that on 16.04.2005. the deceased Dilip Kumar Bansal was standing beside the Morena Sobalgarh Road, opposite Kela Devi Lodge waiting for the bus to Birpur, the place of his residence. He was hit by a truck said to be dr...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Krishna Chaudhary Vs. Sh.Sharad Sharma
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.277/2013 29th October, 2014 % SMT. KRISHNA CHAUDHARY Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Pradeep Chhindra, Advocate. VERSUS SH.SHARAD SHARMA Through: ...... Respondent Mr.R.K.Bali, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 06.8.2011 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the eviction petition filed by the petitioner/ widow /landlady against the respondent/tenant under Section 14 D of the Act. The suit/tenanted property is flat no.E-29, Gaurav Apartments, Plot No.1, I.P. Extension, Delhi. The provision of Section 14 D of the Act allows a bonafide necessity eviction petition to be filed by a widow when the tenanted premises are let by the widow or her...
Tag this Judgment!Emg Hospitality Pvt Ltd Vs. Automobili Italia Pvt Ltd and Others
Court: Delhi
$~47. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 240/2013 % Judgment dated 29.10.2014 EMG HOSPITALITY PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Alok Bhachawat, Adv. versus AUTOMOBILI ITALIA PVT LTD & OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Rajat Bhalla and Mr.Pankul Nagpal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A. No.21233/2013 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under the provisions of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs.26,23,239/-.2. As per the plaint, plaintiff is engaged in the business of wedding and event planning and management. Defendant no.1 is a private limited company. Defendants no.2 and 3 have been impleaded being Directors of defendant no.1. Defendant no.4 is a partnership firm and a dealer of Ferrari Vehicles in Delhi. Defendants no.5 and 6 have been arrayed as parties being partners of defendant no.4.3. It is clarified by learned counsel for the plaintiff that defendant no.2 is also a partner of defendan...
Tag this Judgment!Siddarth Singh Vs. the Vice Chancellor, Delhi University and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h October, 2014 % + LPA No.679/2014 SIDDARTH SINGH Through: .... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini & Mr. Virendra Rawat, Advs. Versus THE VICE CHANCELLOR, DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh Banerjee with Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advs. for R-1/ University of Delhi. Mr. Amit Khemka with Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for R-4. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 10th September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.4794/2014 preferred by the appellant / writ petitioner.2. Notice of this appeal was issued. Considering the nature of the relief claimed, we, with consent, heard the counsels for the appellant / writ petitioner, respondents no.1 to 3 Delhi University and the counsel for the respondent no.4 Maharaja Agarsen College affiliated to the Delhi University, finally, at the afte...
Tag this Judgment!SachIn Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h October, 2014 + CRL.A. 583/2013 SACHIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Sharma and Mr. Vipin Rathi, Advocates Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Sonal Raj, PS New Usmanpur Complainant in person % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The appellant Sachin impugns the judgment dated 26.03.2013 and order on sentence dated 01.04.2013 in Sessions Case No.56/11 FIR No.242/11 under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi where he was convicted under Section 304 Part-II of Indian Penal Code(hereinafter referred to as IPC1860 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six (6) months.2. The gravamen of the prosecution case is as follows.3. Ran...
Tag this Judgment!Saint Travel Services Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 3380/2012 & CM71522012 SAINT TRAVEL SERVICES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ayush for Mr R.K. Saini. For the Respondents : Ms Inderjeet Sidhu for R-1to R-3. Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh and Mrs Avnish Ahlawat, Mr N.K. Singh and Mr Gunjan Bansal for R-5/GNCTD. Dr Lalit Bhasin with Ms Ekta Bhasin, Mr R. Sudhinder, Mr Ranjan Jha and Mr Bhavna Dhami for R6. Mr Rajiv Bansal with Ms Pallavi for High Court. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is engaged in providing services as a travel agent and has filed the present petition impugning an Office Memorandum dated 24.03.2006 which restricts the officers of respondent no.1 to only utilize the services of M/s Balmer Lawrie and Company (hereafter Balmer Lawrie) and M/s Ashok Travels and Tours (hereafter Ashok Travels), as travel agen...
Tag this Judgment!P.D. Verma and Co. Vs. Laxmi Builders
Court: Delhi
$~R-51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29th October, 2014 + RFA3592005 P.D. VERMA AND CO. Through ..... Appellant : Mr. K.R. Chawla, Adv. versus LAXMI BUILDERS Through ..... Respondent :Mr. P.D. Gupta and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. By the impugned judgment and decree suit of the appellant-plaintiff for recovery of `6,45,300/- against the respondent-defendant has been dismissed by the Trial Court. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree, appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Appellant alleged in the plaint that appellant was sole proprietorship firm of Sh. Prabhu Dayal Verma and was engaged in carrying out work of fixing pipes and sanitary installations on job work basis. In the month of April, 1991 respondent awarded contract to appellant for fixing of water supply pipes and sanitary installations in the residential flats constructed by Indraprastha Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. Delhi. Appellant w...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Atul Kumar Vs. Shri Narinder Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.955/2014 & CM No.17589/2014(stay) % 29th October , 2014 SHRI ATUL KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Umesh Shukla, Adv. VERSUS SHRI NARINDER KUMAR Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. It is not unknown that tenants who contest eviction petitions filed under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), use all tricks in the book and not in the book to keep on delaying the disposal of the eviction petitions. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is one such petition and filed clearly in abuse of the process of the law.2. The impugned order dated 6.9.2014 which is challenged by the petitioner/tenant, and who is the respondent in the court below, dismissed an application filed by the petitioner/tenant to recall PW-1 for crossexamination. The main eviction petition which is filed is ...
Tag this Judgment!Sandeep Kumar and anr Vs. Prakash Anand and ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29.10.2014 + CM(M) 946/2014 SANDEEP KUMAR & ANR (LRS OF BABY KHUSHI) ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate. versus PRAKASH ANAND & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate for the Insurance Co./R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.17460/2014 (delay) There is a delay of 15 days in re-filing the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of CM(M) 946/2014 1. By the present petition the petitioner seeks to impugn the order dated 29.08.2014 whereby the entire compensation amount was directed to be kept in a fixed deposit.2. The background facts are that Baby Khushi (minor) received fatal injuries in an accident on 30.12.2013. After certain negotiations on 25.07.2014 a settlement/agreement was entered into before the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi whereby it was mutually agreed that respondent...
Tag this Judgment!