Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 7 of about 220 results (0.039 seconds)The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Kumari and Others
Court: Delhi
$~A-46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 30, 2014 EX.F.A. 22/2014 and CM No.14157/2014 (stay) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr.Salil Paul and Mr.Sahil Paul, Advocates. versus KUMARI AND OTHERS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Rohit Chauhan and Mr.B.B.Solanki, Advocate for R-1 to 5. Mr.Maneesh Gumber, Advocate for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant Insurance Company seeking to impugn the order dated 28.04.2014. By the said impugned order the appellant Insurance Company has been directed to deposit the award amount within two weeks.2. The brief facts as stated in the appeal are that the claim petition was filed without impleading the appellant Insurance Company and only impleaded the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle. It is the contention of the appellant that as per the Award dated 16.01.2010 the award for Rs.4,55,344/- was to be ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Dynatech Controls (P) Ltd. Vs. Ram Murat
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 8404/2010 RAM MURAT ..... Petitioner versus M/S. DYNATECH CONTROLS (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sanjoy Ghose. For the Respondent : Mr Satender Verma. AND + W.P.(C) 3496/2011 M/S. DYNATECH CONTROLS (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner versus RAM MURAT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Satender Verma. For the Respondent : Mr Sanjoy Ghose. ..... Respondent CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions have been filed impugning an award dated 05.12.2009 passed by the Labour Court in DID No.407/06/05 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned award). By the impugned award, the Labour Court has awarded a compensation of `33,705/- to the workman (petitioner in W.P.(C) 8404/2010).2. While the workman is aggrieved by the impugned order inasmuch as, although the Labour Court has held that termination of the wor...
Tag this Judgment!Moni Arora and ors Vs. Yashpal Sehgal and ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 10.2014 MAC.APP. 78/2010 MONI ARORA & ORS Through ..... Appellants Mr.S.K.Rai, Advocate. versus YASHPAL SEHGAL & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa and Ms.Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate for R2/Insurance Co. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. By the present appeal the appellants seeks to impugn the Award dated 23.04.2009.2. The brief facts are that as per the claim petition the deceased Vikas Arora lost his life in a traffic accident on the night of 20.01.2006. The details are that the deceased was sleeping. At around 3.30 am he was woken up by his father and informed that a theft was being committed in the godown where the goods of the deceased were stored and the goods were being loaded in a tempo by the thieves. The deceased along with his brother reached the godown which was near the house. They saw that the tempo driver fleeing away with goods. The deceased with his brothe...
Tag this Judgment!Achey Lal Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: October 30, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1534/2011 ACHEY LAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Ms.Vandana Bhatnagar, Ms.Jhanvi Mahan, Mr.Jaideep Tandon and Mr.Prem Prakash, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with SI Mukesh Kumar, PS Civil Lines. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Achey Lal is convicted for causing the offence punishable under Sections 376/302 IPC by the impugned judgment dated September 27, 2011 and vide order dated October 01, 2011 directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month for offence punishable under Section 376 and to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd.Azam Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: October 30, 2014 % + CRL.A. 777/2011 TOBIR AHMED Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Manoj Komal and SI Amrit Lal, PS Nabi Karim. CRL.A. 699/2011 MOHD.AZAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Manoj Komal and SI Amrit Lal, PS Nabi Karim. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Tobir Ahmed and Mohd. Azam are convicted for the offence punishable under Section 364A/34 IPC by the impugned judgment dated March 03, 2011 for kidnapping for ransom one Mohd. Bakhtawar Ali son of Mohd. Shabir PW-2 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `2000/...
Tag this Judgment!Jitender Kumar @ Jai Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. h October, 2014 Pronounced on :30. h October, 2014 % + CRL.A. 624/2009 JITENDER KUMAR @ JAI ( IN J.C.) ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ashish Kumar, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Sonal Raj, PS New Usmanpur. AND + CRL.A. 692/2009 and Crl.M.B. No.2548/2013 SACHIN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Sharma and Mr.Naveen Gupta, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Sonal Raj, PS New Usmanpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. By filing these two Criminal Appeals bearing Nos.624/2009 and 629/2009, convicts/Appellants Jitender Kumar @ Jai and Sachin are impugning the judgment and order on sentence dated 28.07.2009 and 04.08.2009 respectively passed by learned Addl. Session Judge in Session Case No.195/2008 in FIR No.272/2007 under Sections 376/506/34 IPC, PS New Us...
Tag this Judgment!Rajrani Garg and Another Vs. Naveen Garg and Others
Court: Delhi
$~51. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2283/2013 % Judgment dated 30.10.2014 RAJRANI GARG & ANOTHER ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Amit Vohra and Mr.Jagmohan Singh, Advs. versus NAVEEN GARG AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Ashish Datta, Adv. for defendant no.1. Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv. for defendants no.2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) I.A.14691/2014.1. This is an application filed by plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 for pronouncement of judgment on admissions.2. The necessary facts, which have given to rise to the filing of the present application, are that the plaintiff is the owner and landlord of the shop bearing no.G-1, Ground Floor, having a super area of 2968.39 sq. ft. and covered area of 1484.19 sq. ft., forming part of North Square Mall, built on plots bearing no.F-1, F-2 and F-3, District Centre, Wazirpur, Netaji Subhash Place, Pitampura, New Delhi.3. As per the plaint, the plaintiff entered into a registered lease d...
Tag this Judgment!D.R . SarIn Vs. National Seeds Corporation Limited and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6524/2014 & CM No.15562/2014 Decided on :29. 10.2014 D.R . SARIN ..... Petitioner Through Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rahul Shukla & Mr.Deepak Dahiya, Advocates versus NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. ....Respondents Through Mr.G.Joshi, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Mr.R.V.Sinha & Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates for R-3/CVC Ms.H.Hnunpoii, Advocate for R-4 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for setting aside/quashing the Note and Resolution passed on 1.9.2014 in the 257th meeting of the Board of Directors of the respondent No.1/National Seeds proceedings contemplated therein. Corporation and the resultant Further, the petitioner seeks issuance of directions to the respondent No.3/CVC to decide his representation dated 3.9.2014 and to initiate action against the respondent No.1/Corporation and the respondent No.2/CMD of the Corporation for...
Tag this Judgment!The Chief Engineer Cpwd Vs. Jay Narayan and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. h October, 2014 + W.P.(C) 6254/2013 THE CHIEF ENGINEER CPWD Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saqib, Advocate. Versus JAY NARAYAN & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.N.K.Verma, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 6254/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the ex parte award dated 12.06.2008 and order dated 29.04.2013 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, in Industrial Dispute No.188 of 1998.2. To the claim filed by the respondents/workmen, petitioner filed the written statement on 14.05.1999 and continued to appear before the Tribunal, however, all of a sudden stopped appearing with effect from 28.05.2002. Therefore, vide order dated 16.02.2003, the petitioner was proceeded ex parte. Thereafter on 04.07.2008, after the gap of more than 5 y...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Bhardwaj and ors Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4845/2014 AMIT BHARDWAJ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Rajni Kant Sharma, Advocate with petitioners. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Balbir Singh. Ms. Poonam Mendiratta and Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocates with Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.13/2013 on 11.01.2013 registered under Section 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Shahdara, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties concerned.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Ms. Poonam Mendiratta, Advocate for respondent No.2 / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice.3. The Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Balbir Singh also identifies the petitioners as well a...
Tag this Judgment!