Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 20 of about 220 results (0.021 seconds)Deepak Talwar and anr Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and ors
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4647/2014 DEEPAK TALWAR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Jaskaran Sibia and Ms. Aekta Vats, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate for R1 and 2 Mr. Jagmeet Randhawa, Advocate for the complainant with complainant and Mr. Neeraj Chawla in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.15853/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4647/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.104/2010 under Sections 323/324/341/34 IPC registered at Police Station Hazrat Nizamuddin, Delhi dated 15th May, 2010, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate for respondents 1 an...
Tag this Judgment!Ajit Kumar Vs. Upsc and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 10.2014 + W.P.(C) 1292/2014 AJIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Deepank Yadav and Sh. R. Majumdar, Advocates. Versus UPSC AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Manisha Rana Singh and Sh. Gaurav Sharma, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The limited grievance agitated before the Court by the petitioner is as to his entitlement to be considered for selection and appointment to one of the Central Civil Services in terms of the Civil Services Examination 2006 (hereafter referred to as CSE-2006). The petitioner is an orthopaedically handicapped candidate suffering from disability, more particularly cerebral palsy, and is classifiable as Locomotor Disability. In terms of the Persons with Disabilities (Equa...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Lal Madhok Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 4972/2014 and CM No.9947/2014 KRISHAN LAL MADHOK ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Jagriti Ahuja For the Respondents : Mr Ajay Digpaul and Mr Kunal Punj for respondent No.1 Mr Yeeshu Jain, Ms Jyoti Tyagi and Mr Siddharth Panda for LAC / L&B / respondent No.2 Mr Arjun Pant for the DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. Acquisition proceedings had been initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the petitioners lands. An Award No.1/2007-08 was made on 06.07....
Tag this Judgment!Guddu @ Pandu Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-44 & 45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 13, 2014 + CRL.A.778/2011 GUDDU @ PANDU Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A.556/2014 GUDDU @ PANDU Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Guddu @ Pandu has been convicted vide judgment dated August 26, 2010 for having murdered Firasat Ali at Kabadi Pulia on March 02, 2009 at about 7:30 PM. Vide order on sentence dated September 01, 2010 Guddu has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine in sum of `3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand). The conviction is based on the testimony of Munawar PW-4, a friend of Firasat Ali, to which corroboration has been found from the te...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod and anr Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4655/2014 VINOD & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Eurani Ali Ansari, Advocate petitioners in person with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State with SI Ramphal PS Mehrauli. Complainant/R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.161/2012 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Mehrauli on 7th April, 2012 on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. Respondent No.2/Complainant-Sunita is present in person and is identified by IO/SI Ramphal, Police Station Mehrauli.4. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be registered at the instance of the complainant as a r...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Sujeet Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 23, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: October 13, 2014 + CRL.A. 1190/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP SI Birmati, PS Naraina Mr.Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate with Mr.Utkarsh Saxena, Advocate for the complainant versus SUJEET KUMAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.R.S.Mishra, Advocate with Mr.K.K.Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Criminal law was set into motion when at around 05.54 P.M. on October 06, 2012, an entry was made in the PCR form Ex.PW-2/A by Lady Ct.Anita PW-2, to the effect that a call has been received from the mobile number 8627122482 informing that a wrong act has been committed with a four years old girl near Kendriya Vidyalaya, Naraina. Lady Ct.Anita immediately transmitted the aforesaid information to Police Station Naraina where Ramji Pandey PW-3, recorded DD No.25A, Ex.PW-3/A, notin...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. South India Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. General Mills Marketing Inc. ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : September 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : October 13, 2014 + FAO(OS) 389/2014 M/S. SOUTH INDIA BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Saurabh S.Sinha, Ms.Jaya Manddia and Mr.Sanchit Aggarwal, Advocates versus GENERAL MILLS MARKETING INC. & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Anuradha Salhotra, Advocate with Mr.Sumit Wadhwa and Mr.Tushar A.John, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Appellant the defendant in the suit, assails the order dated July 23, 2014, allowing the application filed by the respondent - plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure granting an interim injunction against the appellant restraining the appellant from using the mark DDAAZS or any other mark deceptively similar to that of the respondent - plaintiffs trade mark HAAGEN-DAZ...
Tag this Judgment!Tushar Keshaorao Deshmukh Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 10.2014 + W.P.(C) 7377/2013. C.M. NO.15839/2013 TUSHAR KESHAORAO DESHMUKH ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Rajan Mani, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Sh. Rohan Gupta, Sh. S.S. Rai and Ms. Ruchika Mahajan, Advocates, for Resp. No.1. Sh. Naresh Kaushik and Sh. Vardhman Kaushik, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, an order of the CAT dated 19.07.2013 dismissing O.A. No.930/2013 has been challenged. The petitioner had sought for the quashing of an order of the second respondent Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), cancelling his candidature for the Civil Services Examination-2012 (CSE-2012) on the ground that it was his eighth attempt and that he had exceeded the permissible number of attempts, i...
Tag this Judgment!Mohan Lal Gandhi and ors Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 5078/2014 and CM No.10134/2014 MOHAN LAL GANDHI & ORS ..... Petitioners versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Pankaj Vivek and Ms Anupriya Singh For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC / L&B Mr Amit Mahajan and Mr Shashi Shekhar for UOI Ms Mrinalini S. Gupta and Ms Ruhi Chopra for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that the counter affidavit has been filed vide Diary No.193107 dated 10.09.2014. The Registry is directed to take it on record. We have seen a copy of the same.2. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinaf...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Yudhvir Singh Vs. Sh. Dharamvir and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:10. h October, 2014 + IA No.9303/2013 in CS(OS) 2083/2008 SH. YUDHVIR SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Akshay Makhija, Ms. Mahima Bahl, Mr. Rohitendra Deb and Ms. Chandni Mehra, Advocates versus SH. DHARAMVIR & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Dharamveer Singh Dagan, Advocate for D-1. Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for D-2. Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Advocate, Mr. Vipin K. Mittal, Advocate & Mr. Anshul K. Mittal, Advocate for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. MITTAL,J.IA No.9303/2013 (Order VI Rule 17 CPC) by Plaintiff 1. This suit for permanent injunction was filed by the Plaintiff initially against Defendants no.1 to 3 with the averments that the Plaintiff is absolute owner of property measuring 3157 sq. yds comprising Khasra no.263, Village Chattarpur, New Delhi which was purchased by the Plaintiff from one Yadram on the basis of various documents including Agreement to Sell and General Power of Attorney. Entire sale co...
Tag this Judgment!