Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 18 of about 220 results (0.021 seconds)4life Trademarks Llc and anr. Vs. Aanchal JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:15. h October, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3141/2014 4LIFE TRADEMARKS LLC & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Chander M. Lall, Adv. with Mr.Subhash Bhutoria, Ms.Tia Malik, Mr.Anuj Nair & Mr.Manas Upmanyu, Advs. versus AANCHAL JAIN & ORS. Through ..... Defendants None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.20186/2014 (exemption) The original/certified copies of the documents be filed two weeks prior to the admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.3141/2014 Let the plaint be registered as a suit. Issue summons to the defendants, on filing of process fee and Regd. A.D. Covers within a week, returnable on 10th November, 2014. Dasti in addition. I.A. No.20185/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Issue notice to the defendants, for the date fixed.2. The plaintiffs have filed this suit for injunction and damages for infringement of trademarks and copyright, passing off and unfa...
Tag this Judgment!Kartikrya Khanna Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4698/2014 KARTIKRYA KHANNA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B.S. Dhir and Mr. Puneet Singh Dhir, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) &ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State with HC Raj Kumar, PS Ambedkar Nagar. Ms. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.15990/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 4698/2014 1. This petition moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.366/2014 registered under Section 279/338 IPC at Police Station Ambedkar Nagar on 13th June, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor and Ms. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate enter appearance and...
Tag this Judgment!A.K.S.Rathore Vs. National Small Industries Corporation (Nsic) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:15. 10.2014 % W.P.(C) 7455/2013 A.K.S. RATHORE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Advocate versus NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION (NSIC) LTD. & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners grievance is in respect of the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) dated 04.12.2012 in O.A. No.2461/2012, and the subsequent order in review dated 11.12.2013 in R.A. No.12/2013. He had claimed promotion to the post of Executive Director/Chief General Manager in the respondent organisation, i.e. National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. (NSIC).2. The petitioner had urged in previous proceedings before the CAT being T.A. No.1451/2009 (which was originally filed before this Court) that his entitlement to be considered and promoted as Executive Director/Chief ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Chand Verma Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3901/2014 RAMESH CHAND VERMA Through Mr. Manoj K. Jha, Advocate ..... Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Ms. Aditi Tomar and Ms. Shubham Mahajan, Advocates for R2/BSES. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.13351/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3901/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.43/2014 registered under Sections 135, 150 of the Electricity Act at police station Palam village, on the ground that the matter has been settled after the payment of the assessment bill (direct theft) raised by the second respondent No.2 / BSES in terms of the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, and in relation to which, the aforesaid complaint under Section 135/150, Electricity Act was institu...
Tag this Judgment!World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Vs. M/S Reshma Collection and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 10.2014 FAO(OS) 506/2013 & CM Nos. 17627/2013, 18606/2013 WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ... Appellant versus M/S RESHMA COLLECTION & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Praveen Anand with Ms Vaishali Mittal, Mr Gurpreet Singh Kahlon and Ms D. Neha Reddy For the Respondent : None CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal is directed against the order dated 04.10.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CS(OS) 1801/2013, whereby the plaint filed by the appellant/plaintiff was directed to be returned to the appellant/ plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC), to be presented before a court of competent jurisdiction.2. The suit had been filed by the appellant/ plaintiff seeking permanent injunction based on alleged infring...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t October 2014 Decided on:15. h October 2014 CRL.A. No.689 of 2008 SUBHASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Imran Ahmad Abbasi and Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1510.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29th July 2008 passed by the Special Judge in CC No.14 of 2001 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 31st July 2008 whereby for each of the offences under Section 7 and Section 13 (2) of the PC Act the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years and a fine of Rs.4,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for 2 months with both sentences being directed to run concurrently.2. The case of...
Tag this Judgment!Arvind Singhal and ors. Vs. Max therapiya Limited and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:17. h September, 2014 Judgment pronounced on:15. h October, 2014 + CS(OS) No.1724/2014 ARVIND SINGHAL & ORS. Plaintiffs Through Mr.Raman Duggal. Adv. with Mrs. Manjula Gandhi, Mr. Shivanshu Kumar, Advs. versus MAX THERAPIYA LIMITED & ORS. Defendants Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anant Garg, Adv. for D-1. Ms. Khushboo Tyagi, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Gaurany Kanth, Adv. for D-3. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order I propose to decide all the pending applications in this suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants in respect of property bearing No.2, Padmini Enclave, Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi 110016 (hereinafter referred to as the suit property).2. The details of the applications are given as under : The following applications are pending disposal at this stage: (i) I.A. No.10958/2014...
Tag this Judgment!Moninder Singh and ors Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3878/2014 MONINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Raj Pal PS Tilak Nagar. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.13311/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 3878/2014 1. This petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.60/2009 registered under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. Complainant as well as all the petitioners are present in person and are iden...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. Vinod Babu
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:15. 10.2014 + W.P. (C) 4539/2014 C.M. No.9047-9049/2014, 15846/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus VINOD BABU ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Meenu Mainee, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The Union of India through Ministry of Railways challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) in OA17722011 dated 10.02.2014 by which the disciplinary orders made against the respondent/applicant was set aside.2. The facts are that the applicant who was at the relevant time working as Driver in the Indian Railways was issued a chargesheet on 28.02.2007 alleging that while working in Train No.5046, he passed signal no.3 at GMC danger position ignoring the rules resulting in collision with another train no.BCM resulting in derailment of three wagons. Th...
Tag this Judgment!Rohit Yadav @ Sunny Vs. Shakuntala @ Babli and ors
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3145/2014 ROHIT YADAV @ SUNNY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vikas Yadav, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus SHAKUNTALA @ BABLI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with ASI Nihal Singh and ASI Sant Ram, PS Chhawala. Complainant in person with her husband. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.361/2014 registered under Sections 451/356/379 IPC at Police Station Chhawala, Delhi on 24th June, 2014 at the instance of the complainant, Shakuntala, who is also arrayed as respondent No.1 in these proceedings, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. Complainant/respondent No.1-Shakuntala is present in person and is identified by Investigating Office...
Tag this Judgment!