Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajit @ Bhure Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 14, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : October 16, 2014 % + CRL.A.958/2010 AJIT @ BHURE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Ms.Vandana Bhatnagar, Mr.Jaideep Tandon, Mr.Prem Prakash and Ms.Jhannvi, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CRL.A. 1051/2010 RAVI KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Satish Chand Gupta, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The case of the prosecution is that on January 11, 2009 a quarrel took place between accused Ajit @ Bhure and the deceased Rishi at which Rishi suffered two simple incised wounds on the index and middle finger of his right hand. Next day on January 12, 2009 at around 6:30 PM the deceased Rishi along with Mukesh @ Mukki (PW-1) went to Ajits house at 31/341, Trilok Puri be...
Surender Singh Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 684 of 2008 Reserved on: October 9, 2014 Decision on: October 16, 2014 SURENDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Vipin K. Mittal, Mr. Kshitij Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1610.2014 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 19th July 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, in CC No.134/06/01 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 7 and Section 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 22nd July 2008 whereby for the offence under Section 7 PC Act, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for two months and for the offence under Section 13 (1) (d) read wit...
M/S Strategic Overseas Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Ajs Builders Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:16. h October, 2014 + CS(OS) 95/2011 M/S STRATEGIC OVERSEAS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Shailender Dahiya, Adv. versus M/S AJS BUILDERS PVT LTD Through: Ex-parte ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. Mittal, J.(Oral) 1. This suit for recovery of `23,62,787/- has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendant with the allegation that the Plaintiff had taken four plots, measuring 240 sq. yds. each in future projects of the Defendant. The amount in respect of the four plots totalling `18,71,515/- was paid on various dates through receipts executed by the Defendant as mentioned in paras 3 to 5 of the plaint.2. It is averred that since the plots were not being allotted and the Plaintiffs Director found that there was no development at the site where the plots were to be carved out, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant for refund of the amount.3. It is the case of the Plaintiff that the Defendant aske...
Rohtash Kanwar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.728 of 2008 Reserved on: October 13, 2014 Decision on: October 17, 2014 MUNSHI RAM ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Kanwal Sapra and Mr. H.R. Dhamija, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. AND CRL.A. No.729 of 2008 ROHTASH KANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Kanwal Sapra and Mr. H.R. Dhamija, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1710.2014 1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 7th August 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge in CC No.129 of 2006, convicting the Appellants for the offences under Sections 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) as well as the order on sentence dated 11 th August 2008, whereby for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act each of them were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of one year along with fin...
M/S Cygnus Medicate Pvt. Ltd. Through Mr. Dinesh B Vs. Bank of Maharas ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:16. h October, 2014 + I.A. 17231/2014 (Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 2714/2014 M/S CYGNUS MEDICATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH MR. DINESH BATRA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Advocate versus BANK OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. S.B. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Navin Thakkar, Advocate for D-1. Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Advocate, Mr. S.T. Srinivasan, Advocate, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Advocate & Ms. Shweta Joshi, Advocate for D-2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL1 This suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent and mandatory injunction has been filed by the Plaintiff against the Defendants on the basis of averments that Defendants no.3 and 4 approached Dr. Dinesh Batra (initially Dr. Dinesh Batra, the Plaintiff in the suit, during the course of submission on I.A.17231/2014 the learned counsel for the Plaintiff sought amendment in the memo of parties and M/s...
Ravi Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 14, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : October 16, 2014 % + CRL.A.958/2010 AJIT @ BHURE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate with Ms.Vandana Bhatnagar, Mr.Jaideep Tandon, Mr.Prem Prakash and Ms.Jhannvi, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CRL.A. 1051/2010 RAVI KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Satish Chand Gupta, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The case of the prosecution is that on January 11, 2009 a quarrel took place between accused Ajit @ Bhure and the deceased Rishi at which Rishi suffered two simple incised wounds on the index and middle finger of his right hand. Next day on January 12, 2009 at around 6:30 PM the deceased Rishi along with Mukesh @ Mukki (PW-1) went to Ajits house at 31/341, Trilok Puri be...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 6172/2014 & CM149382014 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M.S.Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr Tarandeep Singh and Mr Mayank Nagi. For the Respondents : Ms Suruchi Aggarwal. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition the following prayers have been made:a) A Writ of Certiorari or Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order of direction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India quashing adjustment of refund of Rs 89,16,28,190/- pertaining to AY201314 against outstanding penalty demand of AY200506 and directing the Respondents to grant the said refund to Petitioner. b) A Writ of Mandamus or Writ, order or direction in ...
VipIn Rastogi and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4046/2014 VIPIN RASTOGI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Peeush Kulshreshtha, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for State with SI Satbir Singh, PS Gandhi Nagar Mr. K.K. Gambhir, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.334/2005 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for the complainant, who is arrayed as the second respondent herein, enter appearance and accept notice. The Investigating Officer, Sub-Inspector Satbir Singh, Police Station Gandhi Nagar, also identifies the petitioners, as well as the complainant.4. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came t...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Himalya International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
$~01 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h October, 2014 + ITA4372014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus M/S HIMALYA INTERNATIONAL LTD. Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH SANJIV KHANNA, J.The present appeal by the Revenue relates to assessment year 2005-06 and the challenge is to the deletion of addition of Rs.4,07,92,581/- out of addition of Rs.4,33,78,000/- made by the Assessing Officer. As the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( Tribunal, for short), affirming the decision of the first appellate authority-Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [C.I.T (Appeals)]., are factual in nature, the challenge is on the ground that the conclusion formed in the impugned order dated 14th March, 2014, is perverse.2. We have gone through the assessment order. The respondent- assessee was engaged in the business of manufacture...
Sanofi India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Universal Neutraceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :21. t August, 2014 Judgment pronounced on :15. h October, 2014 % + I.A. No.11376/2014 in CS(OS) No.1808/2014 SANOFI INDIA LTD. & ANR. Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Mr. Raunaq Kamath, Adv. versus UNIVERSAL NEUTRACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ....Defendant Through Mr. Rahul Beruar, Adv.with Ms. Jasneet Kaur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, tarnishment etc. against the defendant.2. By way of this order I propose to decide the application being I.A. No.11376/2014 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiffs seeking interim injunction against the defendant restraining from using the mark/name UNIVERSAL or any other mark similar thereto including the domain name or doing any other act amounting to inf...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »