Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Nct of Delhi Through the Director of Vs. Anil Kumar and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 09.2014 Pronounced on:27. 10.2014 + W.P.(C) 7246/2009 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocates. Versus ANIL KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % C.M. NO.2862/2014 For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. No.2862/2014 is allowed. W.P.(C) 7246/2009 1. The Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCT) is aggrieved by a decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in O.A. 833/2008, dated 30th July 2008. The CAT quashed its decision and held that the GNCTD would regularize the applicants in Group-D posts.2. The applicants were working as Groundmen with the Sports Branch of the Directorate of Education (hereafter DoE) in schools and other institutions of the GNCTD. Pursuant to o...
Habeeb-ur Rehman and anr Vs. State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4804/2014 HABEEB-UR REHMAN & ANR Through .... Petitioners Mr. M.A. Hussain, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Rajpal. Mr. Mani Mishra, Advocate with R3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.16469/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4804/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.595/2014 on 30.07.2014, registered under Section 325, 34 IPC at police station Jamia Nagar, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor, and Mr. Mani Mishra, Advocate, enters appearance and accept notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, as well as responden...
Shri Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7243/2014 & CM No.16993/2014 Decided on :27. 10.2014 IN THE MATTER OF SHRI SHIV KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Hari Prakash, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-1/UOI Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Advocate for University CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia that the respondents No.1 to 4/University and the respondent No.5/College be directed to withdraw the post of Section Officer (Administration) from the advertisement dated 4.2.2014 published in the daily newspaper (Annexure P-4). Further, the petitioner seeks a declaration to the effect that he is entitled for promotion to the post of Section Officer (Administration) and therefore, the process of making direct recruitment to the subject post ought to be stayed by the respondents.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits...
Dinesh Prasad Sharma Vs. C.M.D.Bsnl and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:27. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 7858/2013 and C.M. No.9804/2014 DINESH PRASAD SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus C.M.D. BSNL & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. M.M. Sudan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Sudan accepts notice.2. We have heard the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents on the matter finally for disposal.3. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) dated 19.08.2013 and a further order dated 19.09.2013 dismissing his application being T.A. No.04/2013. The petitioners grievance is that the CAT fell into error in holding that the effective date of his voluntary retirement was not 06.08.2009.4. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner an employee of the BSNL issued notice on 17.04.2009 expressing his intention to retire vol...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Bal Kishan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:27. 10.2014 + W.P. (C) 2444/2014 C.M. Nos.5099-5101/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate. versus BAL KISHAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria with Mr. Prakash Chandra Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner, Union of India, claims to be aggrieved by two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 27.08.2013 in OA36512012 and dated 06.11.2013 in in review proceedings.2. The grievance pertains to the directions issued by the CAT in respect of the claim for regularisation made by the respondent (hereafter referred to W.P. (C)2444/2014 Page 1 as applicant). The applicant is a seasonal Anti-Malaria Lascar engaged periodically during malaria occurring season. By a Scheme published on 21.08.1997, the Union of India had put in place the ...
Surender Kumar and ors Vs. Seema and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 158/2014 & EX. APPL.(OS) 514/2014 % Judgment dated 27.10.2014 SURENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Decree Holders Through: Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Adv. versus SEEMA & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. None has appeared on behalf of judgment debtors despite the matter being passed over twice and called for the third time. When the matter was called for the second time counsel for decree holders was requested to inform the counsel for judgment debtors. Ms. Mahajan, counsel for decree holders states that she has spoken to counsel for judgment debtors on her mobile who informed her that he has not received instructions from the judgment debtors and would, thus, be unable to appear 2. Order dated 10.10.2014 of the Division Bench has been filed. As per the order this Court has been asked to decide as to which party is to receive the interest accrued on the sum of Rs.75.00 lac...
Life Technologies Corporation and anr. Vs. Atz Lab Solutions (India) P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: October 18, 2014 CM No.15408/2014 in FAO(OS) 255/2014 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION & ANR. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.C.M.Lall, Advocate with Ms.Nancy Roy and Mr.Jayant Kumar, Advocates versus ATZ LAB SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Ankur Sood, Mr.Abhishek Saket, Mr.Amarjeet Singh and Mr.Shoumendu Mukherji, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Language is a medium of communication, but we find that in Courts language becomes the subject matter of a debate. The reason is that it is possible to give different meanings to an expression or a word and twist with the syntax and play around with words.2. Words and sentences express an idea and assist a literally composition; they express an idea or a concept.3. It is difficult to write and speak with accuracy; not to...
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Novartis Ag and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 18, 2014 + FAO(OS) 447/2014 RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr.Advocate and Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Saya Choudhary and Mr.Saurabh Anand, Advocates versus NOVARTIS AG & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Sunil Gupta, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta Jha, Mr.Manish Kr.Mishra, Ms.Shilpa Arora, Ms.Kritika Sethi, Mr.Talha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Suit seeking permanent injunction restraining the appellant from infringing respondents Indian Patent 212815 along with IA No.17139/2014, under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, came up for preliminary consideration before the learned Single Judge on September 08, 2014, on which date the appellant appeared to oppose the grant of any ad-interi...
Manoj Kumar and ors Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4757/2014 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Yogesh Swaroop and Ms. Asha Garg, Advocates with Petitioner Nos.1, 2 and 3. versus THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. O. P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Ombir Singh. Mr. B.K. Dubey, Advocate with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.16290/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.4757/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.178/2011 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Farsh Bajar on 06.07.2011, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O. P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. B.K. Dubey, Advocate for respondent No.2/ complainant, enter appearance and accept notice....
Murari Lal and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 09, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: October 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 18/2000 RAJESH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Braj Mohan, PS Farsh Bazar CRL.A. 49/2000 VIJAY JAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Dinesh Mathur, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Akshay Bipin, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Braj Mohan, PS Farsh Bazar CRL.A. 27/2000 MURARI LAL & ORS Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Vishal Dabas and Mr.Ajay Tushir, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A.Nos.18/2000 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Inspector Braj Mohan, PS Farsh Bazar Page 1 of 17 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NA...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »