Delhi Court October 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 1 of about 220 results (0.022 seconds)Standard Chartered Grindlays Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Director of Income Tax ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2014 W.P.(C) 1790/2014 & CM37482014 STANDARD CHARTERED GRINDLAYS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus DY. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE22), NEW DELHI & ORS. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Shashi M. Kapila For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Deptt. with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) dated 28th March, 2013 in respect of the assessment year 2006-07. The writ petition is also directed against the proceedings pursuant to the issuance of the impugned notice dated 28th March, 2013.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the notice under Section 148 of the sa...
Tag this Judgment!Riyaz Khan @ Gainda Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : October 31, 2014 + CRL.A. 299/2012 RIYAZ KHAN @ GAINDA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Manoj Singh with Mr. Abhay Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp. Naresh Kumar, Insp. Spl. Staff (North). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Believing the testimony of Suresh Kumar PW-1 and accepting that the knife Ex.P-2 was got recovered pursuant to the disclosure statement made by appellant Riyaz Khan, which knife when sent for the opinion of Dr.Vijay Dhankar PW-22 was opined as capable of inflicting the three injuries on deceased Sunil and additionally capable of causing the cut marks on a vest and a shirt worn by the deceased when he was assaulted, the learned trial Judge has opined vide impugned judgment dated December 14, 2010 that the prosecution has successfully established that Riyaz K...
Tag this Judgment!Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sh. Satish Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 10.2014 Pronounced on:31. 10.2014 + W.P.(C) 41/2014, C.M. 10600/2014 & 10992/2014 NOS.67/2014, SURENDER SINGH & ORS. 10212/2014, ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 44/2014, C.M. NO.69/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner versus SH. BALWAN SINGH & ORS. + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 45/2014, C.M. NO.70/2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioner versus SH. SATISH KUMAR + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 105/2014, C.M. NO.187/2014 BALWAN SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Sh. N.K. Singh and Ms. Gunjan, Advocates, for DTC in Item Nos. 9 to 13. W.P.(C) 41/2014, 44/2014, 45/2014 & 105/2014 Page 1 Sh. A.K. Mishra, Advocate, for petitioner in Item No.10. Dr. Surat Singh with Sh. Arun Kumar Panwar and Sh. Kumar Datta, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 & 8 in Item No.9. Sh. A.K. Mishra, Advocate, for pe...
Tag this Judgment!Rekha S. Srivastava Vs. Punjab National Bank Through Its Chairman Cum ...
Court: Delhi
19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7420/2014 & CM No.17614/2014 (stay) Decided on 31.10.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : REKHA S. SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Advocate versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM GENERAL MANAGER ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was working at the post of Senior Manager in the respondent/Bank, praying inter alia for declaring as illegal, the order dated 24.8.2013 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, pursuant to issuance of chargesheet dated 30.11.2010 initiating disciplinary proceedings against her and deciding inter alia to impose on her the following major penalty:Reduction to the initial stage of Scale-III in the time scale of pay for a period of three years with further directions that she will not earn increments of pay during the period of such reduction and on t...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Bharat Singh
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DEATH SENTENCE REF. No.1 of 2013 STATE ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. versus BHARAT SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Amit Kala, Advocate. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.509 of 2013 BHARAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Amit Kala, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA % ORDER3110.2014 1. By the judgement dated 17th April 2014, this Court had confirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the Appellant Bharat Singh for the offence under Section 376 (2) (f) Indian Penal Code ('IPC') i.e. life imprisonment together with fine of Rs.50,000 and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of one year. The Court also confirmed his conviction for the offence under Section 302 IPC. By this further order, which should be re...
Tag this Judgment!A.K.Wadhwa Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7414/2014 Date of decision:31. 10.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: A.K.WADHWA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sewa Ram, Advocate versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .... Respondents Through : Mr. R.S.Mathur, Advocate for R-1 Ms.Nishtha Sikroria, Advocate for R-2 Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocates for R-3 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner against the respondent No.1/Central Bank of India, respondent No.2/UOI and respondent No.3/Indian Banks Association, praying inter alia for quashing/setting aside the respondent No.1/Banks letter dated 10.2.2014 issued in reply to his legal notice dated 9.1.2014, demanding voluntary retirement pension, under Regulation 29 of the Central Bank of India (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995.2. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.3. Brie...
Tag this Judgment!Rabibul Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 31, 2014 + CRL. A. No.1186/2014 RABIBUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr. K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Inspector Prabhu Dayal, P.S. Narela. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant Sh.K.Singhal, Advocate urges that from the testimony of Rizwan PW-1, the injured eye-witness and that of Jahid PW-3, it is apparent that the appellant had also received an injury on his hand from a knife. Learned counsel submits that Rizwan has not told the complete truth. Learned counsel further submits that the Investigating Officer has withheld the medico legal report of the appellant who was taken to Satyavadi Raja Harish Chandra Hospital, Narela for medical treatment on November 17, 2010. Counsel prays that the case diary with the Investigating Officer may be perused....
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Singh Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DEATH SENTENCE REF. No.1 of 2013 STATE ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. versus BHARAT SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Amit Kala, Advocate. AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.509 of 2013 BHARAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Amit Kala, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR HONBLE Ms. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA % ORDER3110.2014 1. By the judgement dated 17th April 2014, this Court had confirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the Appellant Bharat Singh for the offence under Section 376 (2) (f) Indian Penal Code ('IPC') i.e. life imprisonment together with fine of Rs.50,000 and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of one year. The Court also confirmed his conviction for the offence under Section 302 IPC. By this further order, which should be re...
Tag this Judgment!Lachhman @ Raju and anr. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.726 of 2008 Reserved on: October 15, 2014 Decision on: October 31, 2014 LACHHMAN @ RAJU& ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rajdeep Banerjee and Ms. Joyeeta Banerjee, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT3110.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 1st March 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.186 of 2006 convicting the two Appellants, i.e., Lachhman @ Raju and Kaushal Kumar @ Kallu, for the offence under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 7th March 2008 whereby each of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for three years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000 each and in default to undergo RI for six months for the offence under Section 498A IPC. They were also sentenced to undergo RI for ten years e...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Lovika JaIn Vs. the Principal, Delhi Public School and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA882014 SMT LOVIKA JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Ayush Arora, Advocates. versus % THE PRINCIPAL, DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS.. Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.1 and 2. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER3110.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 9th October 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant seeking direction for accepting his resignation effective from 31.7.2009 and to grant salary for the period from 17th May 2009 to 31st July 2009. Mr. R.K. Saini, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the learned Single Judge failed to appreciate the fact that the acceptance of the appellants resignation by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 with effect from ...
Tag this Judgment!