Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 9 of about 723 results (0.022 seconds)Major P.C. Thakur Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 01.2014 Date of Decision:29. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.442 of 2010 SUNITA BHAGAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.464 of 2010 MAJOR P.C. THAKUR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.473 of 2010 RAJAN RAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.474 of 2010 AJAY VOHRA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Section 12 (1B) of the Securi...
Tag this Judgment!National Research Development Corporation Vs. M/S Industrial Carbon an ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:30. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:29. 01.2014 % + CS(OS) 1202/2009 NATIONAL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ....Plaintiff Versus M/S INDUSTRIAL CARBON AND ORS. .....Defendants ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Plaintiff: Mr. P.N. Bharadwaj, Advocate. For the Defendants: Mr Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate for defendant no.-3. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.CS(OS) 1202/2009, I.A. No.No.12111/2009 (objections filed by the plaintiff) and I.A. No.13663/2010 (objections filed by defendant no.3 Mr. S.R. Mohta) and I.A. No.13664/2010 (application for condonation of delay of 120 days in filing objections filed by defendant no.3 Mr. S.R. Mohta) and IA No.13665/2010 (for taking on record additional documents filed by defendant no.3 Mr. S.R. Mohta). BACKGROUND1 This is an action which pertains to the Arbitration Act 1940 (in short the 1940 Act). Both the plaintiff i.e., the National Research De...
Tag this Judgment!Vipul Gupta Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h January, 2014 % + LPA5482013, CMs No.11737/2013 (for stay), 11739/2013 & 11740/2013 (both for condonation of delay) VIPUL GUPTA + ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCT for R-1,3 to 5. Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Gupta, Mr. Harish Pandey & Mr. Anuj Dhir, Advs. for complainant. AND LPA5672013, CMs No.11963/2013 (for stay), 11965/2013 & 11966/2013 (both for condonation of delay) PRADEEP DHINGRA Through: STATE & ORS ..... Appellant Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish and Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bina Gupta, Mr. Harish Pandey & Mr. Anuj Dhir, Advs. for complainant. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R3,4&6. AND + LPA5692013, CMs No.11973/2013 (for stay) & 11975/2013 &...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Hasim
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.822/2009 STATE Through: .....Appellant Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms.Charu Dalal, Advocate. versus HASIM Through: % ..... Respondent Mr.C.B.Singh, Advocate. Pronounced on : January 29, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J1 Run Away Marriages' are manifestation of a generational change due to variety of factors, including increased interaction between the sexes, with young boys and girls attaining maturity rapidly. It is a complex problem with inter play of social, economic, religious, caste, educational factors, including sex education and vulnerability and backwardness of the weaker sex having its impact. The Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 as well as relevant provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act are social legislations aimed at protection and development of the vulnerable sex and have to be interpreted and worked accordingly. The consequences of conside...
Tag this Judgment!Sanju @ Sonu Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. t January, 2014 DECIDED ON :29. h January, 2014 + CRL.A. 705/2012 SANJU @ SONU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ravinder Narayan, Advocate. VERSUS STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant (Sanju @ Sonu) challenges her conviction under Section 307 IPC by a judgment dated 17.05.2012 in Sessions Case No.47/2011 arising out of FIR No.193/2005 registered at Police Station, Gokulpuri. By an order on sentence dated 21.05.2012, she was awarded rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine `2,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 08.04.2005 at about 11.00 A.M. at Monas house, Mukund Vihar, Karawal Nagar, she administered liquor after mixing acid in it in a Limca bottle to her husband Chetan and when he became unconscious after consuming it, she threw acid on his face in an attempt to murder him. The police machinery was set in...
Tag this Judgment!Sehzad @ Nadeem Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h January, 2014 DECIDED ON :29. h January, 2014 + CRL.A. 1095/2011 SEHZAD @ NADEEM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.A.J.Bhambhani with Ms.Lakshita Sethi and Mr.Apurv Chandola, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Sehzad @ Nadeem questions the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 22.04.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.58/2009 arising out of FIR No.88/2009 registered at Police Station Chandni Mahal by which he was convicted under Section 394/398 IPC. By an order dated 24.04.2010 he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine `10,000/- under Section 398 IPC.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 25.09.2009 at about 11.00 P.M. at shop No.18, DDA Market, Turkman Gate, Delhi, he while armed with a deadly weapon attempted to rob complainant Ikramuddin of `20,000/- and injured him. The c...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Vohra Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 01.2014 Date of Decision:29. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.442 of 2010 SUNITA BHAGAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.464 of 2010 MAJOR P.C. THAKUR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.473 of 2010 RAJAN RAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.474 of 2010 AJAY VOHRA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Section 12 (1B) of the Securi...
Tag this Judgment!Sunita Bhagat Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 01.2014 Date of Decision:29. 01.2014 % + CRL. A. No.442 of 2010 SUNITA BHAGAT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.464 of 2010 MAJOR P.C. THAKUR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Bhagat, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.473 of 2010 RAJAN RAI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. + CRL. A. No.474 of 2010 AJAY VOHRA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, SPP & Mr. R.K. Pillai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.Section 12 (1B) of the Securi...
Tag this Judgment!Banwari Lal Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. APP. NO.371/1999 BANWARI LAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Avninder Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE OF DELHI Through: % ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP Date of Decision : January 29, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction under Section 302 IPC and the consequent sentence of simple imprisonment for life imposed upon the Appellant in addition to fine of ` 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one year.2. The criminal law machinery was set in motion at 10.18 p.m. on 25.3.1992 on receipt of DD No.17A (Ex.PW7/A) at Police Station Geeta Colony to the effect that information was received from PCR about the burning of a lady at a house near Rani Garden, Shiv Mandir. On the same day, at about 10.50 p.m., another information was received from JPN Hospital given b...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Angel Broking Ltd. Vs. Mohit Mittal
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.36/2014 % 29th January, 2014 M/S ANGEL BROKING LTD. ......Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Tomar, Advocate. VERSUS MOHIT MITTAL ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1849/2014(Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. FAO362014 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) challenging the impugned order of the court below dated 24.9.2013 which has dismissed the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent herein was the customer of the appellant who is a trading member not only for the Commodities Exchange (MCX) but also for the National Stock Exchange (NSE). Respondent filed a claim in the arbitration that on 3.1.2012, appellant did unauthorized/illegal trading in NSE ca...
Tag this Judgment!