Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.D.Buildtech P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:09. 01.2014 W.P.(C) 1342/2008 YFC PROJECTS P.LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UOI ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 859/2008 G.D.BUILDTECH P.LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UOI ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 4116/2008 VISTAR CONSTRUCTIONS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 6058/2008 SKYLINE ENGINEERING CONTRACTS (INDIA)(P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 6803/2013 NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CIROIRATUIB KUNUTED (NBCC) ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ANR WP(C) 1342/2008 & Ors. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr J.K. Mittal with Mr Varun Gaba. For the Respondents : Mr Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr Mukesh Anand, Standing Counsel, Ms Anjana Gosain and Mr Ashish Virmani for R-1/UOI in these writ petitions. Ms Sonia Sharma with Mr Sonakshi Dhiman for R-2 in WP(C) Nos.6058/2008 & 6803/2013. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT...
Malti Varma and anr Vs. Manoj Varma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.481/2012 Decided on :09. 01.2014 MALTI VARMA & ANR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. versus MANOJ VARMA Through: ..... Defendant Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar and Mr.Rishi Bhatnagar, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a suit for declaration and permanent injunction.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties with regard to maintainability of the suit on account of lack of cause of action. Before dealing with the said issue, it may be pertinent to give a brief background of the case.3. The suit for declaration and permanent injunction was filed by Ms.Malti Varma and Mrs.Amita Kapoor against Sh.Manoj Varma. C.S. (OS) No.481/2012 Smt.Malti Varma is the mother of Page 1 of 9 Mrs.Amita Kapoor and Mr.Manoj Varma. The husband of Smt.Malti Varma was stated to be employed in Indian Army as a Major and he had seriously got injured in the year 1965 during the Indo-Pak war. On account of having suf...
Prem Nath Chopra Vs. Arun Chopra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.2169 of 2006 & IA No.14130 of 2008 Reserved on: December 17, 2013 Decision on: January 8, 2014 PREM NATH CHOPRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aniruddha Choudhary & Mr. Abhay Narula, Advocates versus ARUN CHOPRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shweta Bharti, Mr. Shantanu, Mr. Vikram Hazarika, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0801.2014 1. The Plaintiff, Mr. Prem Nath Chopra, son of late Mr. Chanan Das Chopra, has filed this suit for partition in respect of the immovable property at D-354, Defence Colony, New Delhi (the suit property) and division of the movable assets of late Mr. Sham Lal Chopra as listed out in Annexure-A and Annexure-B to the plaint. The Defendants in the suit are Mr. Arun Chopra (Defendant No.1), Mr. Vivek Chopra (Defendant No.2), Mr. Virendar Katiyal (Defendant No.3), Mr. Ranjan Katiyal (Defendant No.4), Mrs. Sudesh Prab...
Devinder Kaur and anr. Vs. Surjit Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 18, 2013 Date of decision: January 08, 2014 CS (OS) No.82 of 2005 DEVINDER KAUR & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Advocates for Plaintiff No.1. Mr. Rohit Puri, Advocate for Plaintiff No.2. versus SURJIT SINGH & ORS. ......Defendants Through: Mr. V.P. Vaze and Mr. Samdarshi Sanjay, Advocates for Defendant No.1. Mr. Atul Nigam, Advocate for Defendant No.2. Mr. Meet Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi S.S.Chauhan, Advocate for Defendant No.3. Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath with Ms. Avsi Malik, Advocates for Defendant No.4. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0801.2014 1. Smt. Devinder Kaur and her sister Smt. Gursharan Kaur Mehta have filed the present suit against their brothers Shri S. Surjit Singh, Shri S. Ravinder Singh, Shri S. Gurcharan Singh, Defendants 1, 2 and 3 respectively and their sister Smt. Kanwal Bhalla, Defendant No.4 seeking decla...
Jai Gopal Sethi Vs. Sanjay Sabharwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2014 % + RFA No.136/2005 JAI GOPAL SETHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Adv. Versus SANJAY SABHARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma & Ms. Arjita Bhalla, Advs. for R-3&4. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2004 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi of dismissal of suit No.322/2001 filed by the appellant for recovery of possession of flat No.166, Block No.C-2C, Pocket-II, Pankha Road Residential Scheme (now known as Janakpuri, New Delhi) and for injunction and recovery of mesne profits.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex parte ad-interim order dated 09.03.2005, the parties were directed to maintain status quo with regard to the nature, title and possession of the subject flat. RFA No.136/2005 01.09.2006 the appeal was admitted for hearing and during the pendency the...
M/S. National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S. Pcl Suncon (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:31. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:08. 01.2014 + OMP No.627/2013 M/S. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ....Petitioner Versus M/S. PCL SUNCON (JV) ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Ms. Padma Priya and Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Amit George, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) to assail the award dated 24.02.2013.2. The petitioner has challenged the findings returned with respect to three claims. The fourth claim, which relates to cost of arbitration, is obviously not challenged because the arbitral tribunal has not awarded any amount in respect of the same to the respondent. The respondent is the original claimant before the arbitral tribunal. The petitioner herein evidently had raised no counter claim.3. Insofar ...
The Registrar, Indian Council of Arbitration Vs. K.S. Sidhu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h January, 2014. % + RFA No.341/2013 THE REGISTRAR, INDIAN COUNCIL OF ARBITRATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Murari Kumar, Adv. Versus K.S. SIDHU Through: ..... Respondent Dr. K.S. Sidhu, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sunil Mittal & Ms. Maldeep Sidhu, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 04.06.2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-1, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Suit No.11/2011 (ID No.02403C0004482011) filed by the respondent) in favour of the respondent / plaintiff and against the appellant / defendant for recovery of Rs.5,02,500/- together with costs and interest, pendente lite and future at 10% per annum.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. The respondent / plaintiff has filed cross objections. The appeal and the cross objections were admitted for hearing and with t...
Bachittar Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
$~25 to 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: January 08, 2014 W.P.(C) 3538/2001 GURDEV SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus U.O.I. & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate and Mr.A.K.Arora, Assistant Commandant, CISF W.P.(C) 3540/2001 BALWINDER KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus U.O.I. & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate and Mr.A.K.Arora, Assistant Commandant, CISF W.P.(C) 3541/2001 ANGREJ SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus U.O.I. & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) No.3538/2001 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocate with Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate and Mr.A.K.Arora, Assistant Commandant, CISF Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 3628/2001 BACHITTAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus U.O.I. & ORS. Represe...
Prashant JaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: January 08, 2014 + CRL.A. 1452/2010 PRASHANT JAIN Through ..... Appellant Mr.Harin Raval, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vineet Malhotra & Mr.Aman Khan, Advocates versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A. 1454/2010 YASH JAIN Through ..... Appellant Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Chirag Khurana, Mr.Vishal Dabas & Mr. Ujas Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A. 1455/2010 VEENA JAIN AND ANR Through ..... Appellants Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Chirag Khurana, Mr.Vishal Dabas & Mr. Ujas Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeals is the impugned Judgment dated 08.12.2010...
N.D.P.L. Vs. Sony Steels
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-6 & 7 + CRL.A. 57 of 2008 N.D.P.L. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikram Nandarajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates versus SONY STEELS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ujjwal K. Jha and Mr. B.P. Agarwal, Advocates WITH CRL. A. 230 of 2008 NARENDRA KUMAR GUPTA ......Appellant Through: Mr. Ujjwal K. Jha and Mr. B.P. Agarwal, Advocates versus N.D.P.L. Through: .......Respondent Mr. Vikram Nandarajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER0801.2014 1. These are two Appeals one by Mr. Narender Kumar Gupta, the Appellant in Crl. A. 230 of 2008 and the other by North Delhi Power Limited (NDPL), being Crl. A. No.57 of 2008 against the impugned judgment dated 29th September 2007 and the conviction order dated 5th October 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Delhi.2. By the impugned judgment dated 29th September 2007, the learned ASJ held Mr. Narender Kumar Gupta to be guilty of the offence under Sec...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »