Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumari Shinay Gupta Vs. Mohd. Kaleem
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 10, 2014 + CM(M) No.1269/2012 & C.M. No.19695/2012 KUMARI SHINAY GUPTA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Jagjit Singh, Adv. versus MOHD. KALEEM Through ..... Respondent Mr.L.K.Verma, Adv. for Ms.Subhavana Verma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed order dated 7th August, 2012 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge whereby the application of the petitioner under Order 15 and Order 20 CPC was dismissed.2. The petitioner aged about 24 years, daughter of Radhey Kishan, Hindu by religion and Gupta by caste and educated upto M.A. She was earlier resident of House No.705/1, Ward No.III, Mehrauli, New Delhi, whereas, the respondent, Muslim by religion and illiterate, is a tailor by profession and was stitching clothes for petitioner and members of her family and had been visiting the...
Rajesh Bansal and anr Vs. A.S. Rastogi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h January, 2014. + RFA2282013 RAJESH BANSAL AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Laliet Kumar and Mr. Deepak Vohara, Advocates. Versus A.S. RASTOGI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. D.R. Bhatia, Mr. Rishi Manchanda and Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 29 th January, 2013 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ)-06 (Central), Delhi in Suit No.104/09/07 (UID No.02401C0887942007) filed by the respondent/plaintiff) of recovery from the appellants of mesne profits/damages for unauthorized use and occupation of Flat No.210, admeasuring 542.41 sq. ft. Bajaj House, 97, Nehru Place, New Delhi (after the determination of the tenancy of the appellants/defendants) @ Rs.50,000/per month with effect from 5th September, 2007 till 2nd April, 2012, less the amounts for the said period already...
Oriental Cuisines Private Ltd. Vs. Star Restaurants Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:17. 12.2013 % Judgment delivered on:10. 01.2014 + CS(OS) 1069/2008 and I.A. No.8638/2008 ORIENTAL CUISINES PRIVATE LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. H.P. Singh & Mr. Navroop Singh, Advocates. versus STAR RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LTD. Through: ..... Defendant CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The Plaintiff, Oriental Cuisines Private Limited, has filed the present suit alleging passing off and infringement of its trademark and copyright in the mark THE NOODLE HOUSE by the defendant, Star Restaurants Private Limited, and consequently seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, whether acting by itself or through its partners or proprietor, its officers, servants, agents and representatives from manufacturing and selling and offering for sale or supply, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing or rendering services in the hospitality industry or other related goods and serv...
Praveen Oberoi Vs. Raj Kumari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h January, 2014 % + RFA2992013 PRAVEEN OBEROI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Jyotika Kalra Versus RAJ KUMARI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mahavir Sharma, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 12 th April, 2013 of the Court of the Addl. District Judge-01, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Suit No.262/11 filed by the respondent) against the appellant/defendant and in favour of the respondent/plaintiff of recovery of Rs.11 lacs. The said recovery from the appellant/defendant was ordered in enforcement of a clause in the Agreement of Sale of immovable property executed by the appellant/defendant in favour of the respondent/plaintiff, of payment by the appellant/defendant to the respondent/plaintiff of double the amount of earnest money paid by the respondent /plaintiff at the time of execution of Agreement to Sell, in the event of appe...
Mool Chand @ Chilli and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : December 12, 2013 DECIDED ON : January 10, 2014 + Crl.A.No.420/2000 & Crl.M.A.No.5951/2013 MOOL CHAND @ CHILLI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Sunil Tiwari, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Mool Chand @ Chilli (A-1), Badari Nath (A-2), Shankar (A-3), Amar Singh @ Amaroo (A-4) and Shiv Om (A-5) were arrested by the police of PS Rajouri Garden in case FIR No.631/1995 for committing offences under Section 307/34 IPC and sent for trial on the allegations that on 20.08.1995 at about 11.40 A.M. at DDA park, E-Block, near public latrine, Rajouri Garden they, in furtherance of common intention inflicted injury to Rakesh in an attempt to murder him. During the course of investigation, the accused persons were arrested and crime weapons were recovered at their instance. Statements of witnesses conversant with the facts were recorded. After completion o...
Rajender Prasad Sharma Vs. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on January 10, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5307/2008 RAJENDER PRASAD SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate versus NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Mithilesh Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Narender Pal Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated May 01, 2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track CourtXXI, Karkardooma in LCA No.11/06/005, whereby the application of the claimant under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act has been rejected.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner herein is Mr.Rajender Prasad Sharma is the father of late Vinay Prakash, who was employed with the respondent as a regular employee. Vinay Prakash expired on September 21, 1989 leaving behind his wife, his father, mother and brother. The petitioner he...
Poonam Garg Vs. the Chief Manager, State Bank of Patiala and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 01.2014 WP (C) 527/2012 POONAM GARG Petitioner versus THE CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 : Mr Vikas Mahajan with Mr Vikrant Nilesh Goyal : Mr Shiv K. Tyagi CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal has jurisdiction to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in the filing of an appeal under Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Securitisation Act)?. WP(C) 527/2012 petitioner had filed an application under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act, being aggrieved by the measures taken by the respondent No.1 /...
K.R. Vengadeswar Vs. the Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 01.2014 Date of Decision:10. 01.2014 CRL.A. 830/2010 K.R. VENGADESWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus THE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Respondent Through: Mr Satish Aggarwala with Mr Sushil Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 31.08.2004, Mangal Dass, Intelligence Officer in Narcotics Control Bureau received a secret information that one person, namely Dilbagh Singh, a resident of Chandigarh, would reach New Delhi Railway Station between 4.00 PM to 5.00 PM in his car bearing Registration No.DL6CG9691and will be carrying heroin concealed in the dicky of the said car for delivering the same to his customers near reservation office at New Delhi Railway Station. The said information was submitted by Shri Mangal Dass to his senior officer and a search authorization in his favour was issued by the Superintendent of NCB. On receiving the search authorization, the comp...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Pramod Kumar Dang
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:1. s t November, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: January, 2014 % + ITA622001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA X Through: .Appellant Mr. Rohit Madan, Advocate. Versus PRA MOD K UMA R DANG ..... R ESPONDENT Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Revenue has filed the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax A ct, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the order dated 28.08.2000 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).2. The Tribunal vide the impugned order set aside the ======================================================================= order of the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as the CIT (Appeals) ) dismissing the appeal of the Assessee holding that the Assessee had not paid the amount of tax due on the income returned by him prior ...
Action Committee Unaided Recognized Private School Vs. Honble Lt. Gove ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
45 & 52 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 177/2014 ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta, Mr. Kamal Gupta, Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Shyel Trehan, Mr. Nshant Gokhale and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocates. versus HONBLE LT. GOVERNOR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raja Ram Sundaram, Senior Advocate with Mr. V.K. Tandon, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.3/UOI. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate for Social Jurist. And 52 + W.P.(C) 202/2014 FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vedanata VArma and Mr. Vibhor Kush, Advocates. versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raja Ram Sundaram, Senior Advocate with Ms. Zubeda Begum for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.3/UOI. Mr....
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »