Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Vs. Union of India Through General Manager Northern Ra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO4552012 13th January, 2014 % RAMESH Through: ......Appellant Mr. Anshoman Bal, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Through General Manager Northern Railway, New Delhi ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Amitabh Narender, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM Nos. 19052/2012 (delay of 10 days) & 19053/2012 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application delay in filing and re-filing is condoned. CMs stand disposed of. FAO4552012 1. Challenge by means of this first appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 is to the impugned judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 6.1.2012 by which the claim petition filed by the appellant herein/ applicant (now deceased and represented through his legal heirs) before the Railway Claims Tribunal was dismissed.2. The case of the appellant was that he is entitled to compensation because he fell...
Ridhima Juneja Vs. Deven Juneja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % T.R.P.(C) No.88/2013 13th January, 2014 RIDHIMA JUNEJA Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Naina Dubey and Mr. Narendra Goyal, Advocates. VERSUS DEVEN JUNEJA Through: ...... Respondent Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 24 CPC by the wife to transfer the petition filed by the respondent-husband for divorce in the Rohini District Courts to Saket District Courts where the petition filed by the petitioner-wife under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is pending disposal.2. On 19.11.2013, a learned Single Judge of this Court passed the following order:The learned counsel for appellant seeks time to obtain instructions as to whether the petitioner would be willing to have two matters, which are stated to be pending in Saket Courts, transferred to Rohini Court where the divorce p...
Yusuf @ Bindu @ Bashir Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:13. 01.2014 CRL. A. No.65/2013 ANNISUDDIN @ ANNISH Through: ..... Appellant Mr S.B. Dandapani, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL. A. No.553/2013 YUSUF @ BINDU @ BASHIR ..... Appellant Through: Ms Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL. A. No.1137/2012 NAFEES Through: ..... Appellant Ms Nazima Siddiqui, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On the night intervening 10-11th September, 2006, on receipt of information from Police Control Room with respect to use of knife in an incident near MV-I red light on the national highway, SI Rupesh Khatri of Police Station Mandawali reached the spot, where two home guard officials, namely, Pankaj and Parikshit produced the appellants Yusuf and Anisuddin along wit...
Tilak Raj Vs. Aman Kumar @ Amar Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on January 13, 2014 + W.P.(C) 01/2014 TILAK RAJ Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajeev Kumar with Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocates Versus AMAN KUMAR @ AMAR KUMAR Represented by: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) CM Appl. No.07/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.01/2014 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the Award dated July 04, 2013 passed in I.D. No.294 of 2009 by the Labour Court, whereby the Labour Court has in the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view that the respondent-workman has sustained permanent injury awarded a lump sum compensation of Rs. 2,90,000 (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety Thousand only) in lieu of reinstatement with back wages.2. It was the case of the respondent that he was engaged with the petitioner for the last one and half years before the filing of the claim a...
AnnisuddIn @ Annish Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:13. 01.2014 CRL. A. No.65/2013 ANNISUDDIN @ ANNISH Through: ..... Appellant Mr S.B. Dandapani, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL. A. No.553/2013 YUSUF @ BINDU @ BASHIR ..... Appellant Through: Ms Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL. A. No.1137/2012 NAFEES Through: ..... Appellant Ms Nazima Siddiqui, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On the night intervening 10-11th September, 2006, on receipt of information from Police Control Room with respect to use of knife in an incident near MV-I red light on the national highway, SI Rupesh Khatri of Police Station Mandawali reached the spot, where two home guard officials, namely, Pankaj and Parikshit produced the appellants Yusuf and Anisuddin along wit...
Ram Karan Singh (Since Deceased) Thru Lrs. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 02, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: January 13, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7176/1999 RAM KARAN SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.Rs. .....Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.A.K.Trivedi and Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The factual backdrop necessary to be noted to dispose of the above captioned petition is that on November 21, 1962 the petitioner was enrolled in CRPF. On March 27, 1998 the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF (Disciplinary Authority of the petitioner) issued a charge sheet to the petitioner listing out one article of charge.2. In a nutshell, the gist of the charge framed against the petitioner was that while functioning as officiating Officer Commanding SWS, Guwahati he presented bil...
Ramesh Bhateja Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.147/2014 Date of decision:13. h January, 2014 RAMESH BHATEJA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajeev Kapoor & Mr. Sarvpreet S. Chawla, Adv. versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.505/2014 The application is allowed, subject to filing of certified copies within four weeks. Application stands disposed of accordingly. Crl.M.C. No.147/2014 1. This is a petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) against the impugned order dated 2.12.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby Criminal Revision filed by the petitioner against the dismissal of his application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the proprietor of M/s Ghanshyam Plastic Works and hav...
Nafees Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:13. 01.2014 CRL. A. No.65/2013 ANNISUDDIN @ ANNISH Through: ..... Appellant Mr S.B. Dandapani, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. + CRL. A. No.553/2013 YUSUF @ BINDU @ BASHIR ..... Appellant Through: Ms Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL. A. No.1137/2012 NAFEES Through: ..... Appellant Ms Nazima Siddiqui, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On the night intervening 10-11th September, 2006, on receipt of information from Police Control Room with respect to use of knife in an incident near MV-I red light on the national highway, SI Rupesh Khatri of Police Station Mandawali reached the spot, where two home guard officials, namely, Pankaj and Parikshit produced the appellants Yusuf and Anisuddin along wit...
Xerox India Limited Vs. M/S. Computers Unlimited and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:22. 10.2013 Judgment delivered on:13. 01.2014 % + OMP3572013 XEROX INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner VERSUS M/S. COMPUTERS UNLIMITED AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajat Joneja, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Manjula Gupta, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) to lay challenge to an award dated 26.11.2012 passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by this court. 1.1. The arbitrator was appointed vide order dated 07.02.2007 in a petition filed under Section 11 (6) r/w. Section 11(8) of the Act by respondent no.1, which is the original claimant, in the present proceedings. Notably, by this order, not only was the arbitrator appointed, but his fee at the rate of Rs. 11,000/- per hearing, subject to a maximum of Rs. 1,10,000/-,...
Rambir Singh Vs. Govt. of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: January 02, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: January 13, 2014 % + WP(C) 4644/2000 RAMBIR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Prakash Gautam, Advocate with Mr.Vivek Ojha, Advocate versus GOVT.OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate with Mr.Bhupinder Sharma, Dy.Commandant, BSF for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed praying that the order dated January 25, 2000 passed by the Inspector General (Pers.) terminating the service of the petitioner as well as the order dated May 31, 2000 rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioner be quashed.2. Admittedly the petitioner was appointed as a Sub-Inspector in BSF on April 17, 1996 and while so working had, in response to an advertisement inviting applications for direct recruitment to the post of Assistant Commandant in BSF applied for being ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »