Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 14 of about 723 results (0.022 seconds)Delhi Administration Delhi Vs. Sunil Kumar and anr
Court: Delhi
R-21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :20. 01.2014 Judgment delivered on:28. 01.2014 CRL.A. 59/2006 DELHI ADMINISTRATION, DELHI Through ..... Appellant Mr. Varun Goswami, APP, Adv. versus SUNIL KUMAR AND ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narang, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 02.9.2004 wherein appellants {Sunil Kumar and Lajwanti, convicted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate under Sections 7 and 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (hereinafter referred to as the PFA Act) had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for two months}. The impugned judgment had set aside the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate; both the respondents have been acquitted. 2 The case of the complainant is that on 10.12.1992 ...
Tag this Judgment!Surbhi Singh Vs. the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1820/2012 SURBHI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Adv. versus THE GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Sharma with Ms. Shikha Tandon, Advocates Date of Decision :28. h January, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The short issue that arises for consideration in the present case is whether the petitioner is entitled for refund of fee which she had voluntarily paid for seeking admission to the Guru Nanak Institute of Management where she was initially enrolled for the Masters of Computer Application (MCA) Program for the academic year 2010.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the prayer for refund of fees, relies upon the judgement of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Shadma Amreen v. Jiwaji University through its Registrar, Gwalior (MP) (Writ Petition No.2220/10), decided on 13th August, 2010 wherein it has been held ...
Tag this Judgment!Lilawati and ors Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.386/2010 28th January, 2014 LILAWATI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop and Mr. B.K.Roy, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this first appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, the applicants/appellants impugn the judgment dated 1.7.2010 of the Railway Claims Tribunal whereby the claim petition has been dismissed.2. The admitted case of the applicants is that the deceased Sh. Guru Prasad, and who was the husband of the applicant-appellant no.1, had purchased a train ticket from Dalmu to New Delhi for travelling by 4517 Unchahar Express. It is further pleaded that the deceased Guru Prasad could not get down at the New Delhi Railway Station and therefore, when train reached Holambi Kalan Railway Station, due to sudden jerk, he fell down from the running train an...
Tag this Judgment!Prakash Chand Vs. M/S. Icici Bank Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.210/2013 and C.M. Nos.14325/2013 and 14328/2013 % 28th January, 2014 PRAKASH CHAND ..... Appellant Through: versus M/S. ICICI BANK LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Bhalla, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the appellant although it is 2.25 P.M. I have therefore heard the counsel for the respondent and perused the record. I am therefore proceeding to decide this appeal.2. The challenge by means of this RSA is to the concurrent judgments of the Courts below; of the trial Court dated 23.4.2012 and of the appellate Court dated 20.12.2012; dismissing the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant in a suit under Order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) RSA No.210/2013 filed by the respondent/plaintiff/bank. defendant/appellant in the leave to defend application admitted taking of the loan and making...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Gulab Singh Vs. Shri Dal Chand Lowadia and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.82/2013 28th January, 2014 % SHRI GULAB SINGH Through: ......Appellant Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate. VERSUS SHRI DAL CHAND LOWADIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 3.8.2009 and the appellate Court dated 22.12.2012; by which the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for declaration and injunction with respect to property bearing Municipal No.3738, Gali No.17, Rehghar Pura, Karol Bagh, Delhi-110005 was dismissed. RSA No.82/2013 In the suit, Page 1 of 4 declaration was prayed that the registered sale deed dated 28.3.1990 executed by the father of the appellant/plaintiff late Sh. Panna Lal in favour of the defendant is illegal and void because the property was an HUF property...
Tag this Judgment!Nikunj Wadhawan Vs. Jitender and ors
Court: Delhi
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. h January, 2014 MAC.APP. 779/2012 NIKUNJ WADHAWAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. H.S. Arora, Adv. Versus JITENDER & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms. Shruti Shukla, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 12.01.2012 whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.10,61,541/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the instant appeal, appellant is seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant / claimant has argued that PW5, Dr. Arun Yadav, Sr. Orthopaedic Surgeon, Bara Hindu Rao Hospital, deposed that as per disability certificate Ex.PW3/16, the appellant had received 50% permanent disability qua the whole body. However, ld. Tribunal has erred in consid...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Chand and anr. Vs. State Bank of Patiala and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.56/2006 28th January, 2014 % SUBHASH CHAND AND ANR. Through: ......Appellants Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Advocate with Mr. Vikrant Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Sunil Puri, Advocate. VERSUS STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Narinder Pal, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In the present Regular Second Appeal, the following substantial question of law was framed on 27.1.2012:Whether the acknowledgment of debt by principal debtor would not extend limitation qua the guarantor?.2. Appellants are the guarantors. Respondent no.1/plaintiff gave a loan to the principal borrower in the year 1991 for which the appellants signed the RSA No.56/2006 deed of guarantee on 31.10.1991. The borrower/defendant no.1 signed the balance confirmatory cum acknowledgment on 21.7.1994 and suit was filed by the respondent no.1/bank withi...
Tag this Judgment!icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nikunj Wadhawan and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. h January, 2014 MAC.APP. 492/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Shruti Shukla, Adv. Versus NIKUNJ WADHAWAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. H.S. Arora, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 12.01.2012 whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.10,61,541/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. The Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that claimant / injured failed to prove that he was on a permanent job, therefore, the Ld. Tribunal considered his salary as Rs.3,953/- per month on the basis of Minimum Wages Act, prevailing on the date of accident. However, ld. Tribunal has erroneously added 50% towards future prospects, contrary to the dictum of ...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Vs. Usha Verma and anr
Court: Delhi
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S. (OS) No.266/2012 Decided on :28. 01.2014 VED PRAKASH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindroo, Advocate. versus USHA VERMA & ANR Through: ..... Defendants Mr. R.L. Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) IA No.8118/2013 1. This is an application filed by the defendant under Section 151 CPC for modification of the order dated 01.04.2013 with regard to restoration of issue No.6. The reply to the application has been filed.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.3. The plaintiff has filed a suit for possession and recovery of mesne profits/damages against defendant No.1/Smt.Usha Verma and her son Mr.Ajay Kumar Verma/defendant No.2.4. The case which has been set up in the plaint is that the plaintiff is the owner of the property bearing No.D-13/4, Model Town, Delhi 110009 having purchased a plot of land from Sh.Jagdish Chander Chopra through a registered sale deed d...
Tag this Judgment!Rishan Hasan (Minor) Through His Mother Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:28. 01.2014 + W.P.(C) 4423/2013 RISHAN HASAN (MINOR) THROUGH HIS MOTHER ... PETITIONER VERSUS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Dubey, Advocate with father of the petitioner For the Respondents: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao and Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Advocates for R-2 CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by a mother of the ward, who is approximately 4 years and 5 months old. The mother belongs to a minority community. The mother is seeking admission of her ward in respondent no.2 school. 1.1 The learned counsel for the petitioner claims that the petitioner has wrongly been excluded by respondent no.2 school from admission to Nursery class. It may be relevant to note that the academic year, with which, one is dealing with, commenced on 01.04.2013 and is to end on 31.03.2014. 1.2 Pertinently, the...
Tag this Judgment!