Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abrar Ahmad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4055/2013 Date of Decision :27. h September, 2013 % ABRAR AHMAD Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Athar Alam, Ms.Sumbul Ajhar, Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr.Ejaj Ahmad, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Karan Singh, APP. ASI Kirshan Pal, P.S. Jamia Nagar CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A.14499/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Crl. M.C.4055/2013 1. The petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No.316/2013, P.S. Jamia Nagar under Section 304A IPC on the ground that he has settled the matter with respondents no.2 and 3.2. On 21st June, 2013, Mohd. Irshad (deceased) was working under the petitioner at D-7, Batla House, Gali No.2, P.S. Jamia Nagar, New Delhi where the construction work was going on. The deceased Mohd. Irshad suffered an electric shock from an electric wire hanging on the 4th floor of the building which resulted in his death. FIR No.316/2013 was registered against the petitioner on the g...
Charan Singh Vs. State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d July, 2013 Date of Decision:27. h September, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1272/2011 RAM NIWAS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr.Tarunesh Kumar & Mr. Dushyant Yadav, Advocates Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1317/2011 SATISH @ ATAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr.Tarunesh Kumar & Mr. Dushyant Yadav, Advocates Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1469/2011 CHARAN SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate Versus STATE (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) Through: CRL.A.No.1272/2011 ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State Page 1 of 41 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.818/2012 RAM SNEHI @ PINTOO Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Dikshit, Advocate Versus STATE (G.N.C.T. of Delhi) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR....
Rohit Bhardwaj and ors Vs. Army College of Medical Sciences and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:27. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 6156/2013 & CM No.13548/2013 (Directions) ROHIT BHARDWAJ & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey & Ms. Shuchi Singh, Advs. versus ARMY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & OR..... Respondents Through: Col. (Retd.) R. Balasubramanian, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Mukul Talwar, Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra & Mr. Vipin Singh, Advs. for R-5. Mr. Sumit Chander, Adv. for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court are the students of Army College of Medical Sciences being run by Army Welfare Education Society. As part of their course requirement, the petitioners are required to do internship. The said internship, according to the petitioners, is being done at Army Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt. Vide Office Memorandum dated 30.6.2008, Government of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, enhanced the stipend in respect of intern...
Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Gurnam Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 121/2012 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.B.S.Arora, Advocate. versus GURNAM SINGH & ANR. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.S.S.Das, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Narcotics Control Bureau (the petitioner) has filed Criminal Leave Petition to challenge a judgment dated 30.08.2011 of learned Special Judge, NDPS, New Delhi by which the respondents Gurnam Singh and N.C.Chellathambi were acquitted of the charges. The leave petition is contested by the respondents. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. Allegations against the respondents were that on or before 27.01.2003, they entered into criminal conspiracy with Lal Man Pua (Chinese national), Gurbachan Singh, Devinder Singh and Shekhar (not arrested) to illegally acquire, possess and deal with controlled substance. On 27.01.2003, the Philippine Drug ...
Yogender Singh Vs. Prem Lata and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h September, 2013 + RFA362005 YOGENDER SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.S. Tomar, Adv. Versus PREM LATA & ANR Through: .......Respondents Mr. G.P. Thareja and Mr. C.P. Puri, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 9 th December, 2004 of the Court of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi of dismissal of suit No.351/04/02 filed by the appellant.2. The said suit was filed by the appellant for the reliefs of, (i) declaration, declaring/cancelling the documents if any in power and possession of the respondents/defendants alleged to have been executed by the appellant/plaintiff with regard to the sale of property No.A-39 (near Veer Arya Model School) Badli Extension, Village-Badli, Delhi as illegal, null and void and not binding upon the appellant/plaintiff; (ii) a decree for possession of the said property; (iii) a decree for mesn...
Zahoor Ahmed Vs. Rajesh Katyal and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA No.3987/2013 (O.XII R.6 r/w S.151 CPC) in CS(OS) 2536/2010 Reserved on:16. h September, 2013 Decided on:27. h September, 2013 % ZAHOOR AHMED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Mukul Talwar with Ms. Anju Lal and Mr. Vipin Singh, Advs. versus RAJESH KATYAL & ANR Through ..... Defendants Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gautam Anand and Mr. Mridul Gupta, Advs. for D-1 to D-3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this application, the plaintiff/applicant seeks a decree on admissions against the defendants.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff contends that defendants No.1 to 3 are the illegal occupants of the suit shop and by a notice dated 16th September, 2010 the defendants were called upon to discontinue their illegal user from the said premises and to hand over vacant and peaceful possession along with damages to the plaintiff. The stand of defendants No.1 to 3 is that they are the bona fide tenants of the suit shop. They along with late S...
N.S. Atwal Vs. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 09.2013 + RFA (OS) 125/2013, C.M. No.15154/2013, 15155/2013 & 15156/2013 N.S. ATWAL ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Rajshekhar Rao with Sh. A.S. Pujari, Advocate. versus JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Atul Shankar Mathur and Ms. Shruti Verma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. No.15154/2013 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. No.15154/2013 is allowed. RFA (OS) 125/2013, C.M. No.15155/2013 & 15156/2013 1. This is an appeal from an order of the learned Single Judge declining the unsuccessful defendants (in the suit, and the appellant herein) leave to defend a suit brought under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) by Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. (hereinafter JSPL) for recovery of a principal sum of `2,98,39,060/along wi...
Sunil Buckshee Vs. K.M. Buckshee (Deceased) Through Lr???s and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 % + RFA 442/2004 SUNIL BUCKSHEE Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anisha Banerji & Ms. Mrinalini S. Gupta, Advs. with appellant in person. Versus K.M. BUCKSHEE (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Nitin Nayyar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2004 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi of dismissal of suit No.350/03/90 filed by the appellant for declaration that he is the owner of residential premises bearing Flat No.8762, Pocket-8, Sector-C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi to the extent of 40% share therein and for putting him into joint possession thereof along with the defendant No.1.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing and vide ex parte ad interim order dated 11.08.2004 the respondents / defendants were restrained from selling the property. The ...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Raju Saw and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 1074/2012 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh and Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advs. Versus RAJU SAW & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal and Ms. Mamta Bhadwaj, Advs. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM. No.17080/2012 (For delay) In view of the averments made in the application, the delay of 28 days in filing the instant appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. + MAC.APP. 1074/2012 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 05.05.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation as under:1. Loss of dependency 2. Funeral Charges 3. Loss of Estate 4. Loss of Love and Affection etc. Total MAC.APP. 1074/2012 - Rs.4,30,989/Rs. 10,000/Rs.1,00,000/Rs.1,00,000/Rs.6,40,989/- Page 1 o2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that respondents / claimant...
Gram Vikas Samiti(Regd) Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4991/2011 & CM.APPL.10107/2011 GRAM VIKAS SAMITI(REGD) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. B.K. Sood with Mr. Manik Sood & Mr. Archit Vasudeva, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Chander, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. N.S. Dalal with Mr. Amit Rana & Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates for Respondents No.3, 4 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL ORDER 26.09.2013 % 1. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the consolidation in village Khera Khurd started in the year 1970 and came to an end in the year 1973. Some objections were raised to the consolidation by Shri Ram Swaroop (since deceased) before the Consolidation Officer through his legal heirs. The matter was remanded to Officer(Tehsildar) by an order dated 16.10.2008. the Consolidation By an order dated 04.12.2008 read with the order dated 23.12.2008, agricultural land bearing Khasra No.51//17 min (2-...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »