Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Mohit Store Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :22. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :02. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 1958/2013 & CM 3726/2013 M/S MOHIT STORE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Garg and Mr.Amit Srivastava with Inspector Kailash Kumar + W.P.(C) 1971/2013 & CM 3756/2013 M/S GANGA ADEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinay Garg and Mr.Amit Srivastava with Inspector Kailash Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioners in W.P.(C) No.1958/2013 and 1971/2013 are running Fair Price Shops bearing Nos. 9097 and 4799 respectively. The fair price shop holder is required to sell the specified food articles such as foodgrains only against the consumer cards registered with them or against the special ca...
Bv Shrihari Rao Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P (C) No. 141/2011& CM. No. 9248/2012 % Judgment reserved on:23. d July, 2013 Judgment delivered on:2. d September, 2013 BV SHRIHARI RAO Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Rajagopalan and Ms. Madhu Tyagi, Advs. Versus OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.M. Koura and Ms.P.K. Benipal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant petition has been preferred against the impugned order dated 02.12.2010, whereby, penalty of removal from service has been imposed upon the petitioner.2. To adjudicate the instant petition, it is necessary to record the background of this case. Petitioner was appointed for the post of Geologist on 06.07.1989. In the year 2009, he was in Level E4 and was posted at Rajahmundry in the State of Andhra Pradesh. He was the President of the Association of Scientific and Technical Officers (ASTO) of Rajahmundry Unit of ASTO, ONGC. In the month of January, 20...
Ankit Aggarwal Vs. Regional Passport Officer and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5185/2013 ANKIT AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Mishra, Adv. versus REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Kimmi Brara Marwaha, Adv. for R-1&2 alongwith Mr. Ghanshyam Kansra(Assistant Passport Officer) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner, who at that time was a minor, applied for issuance of a passport. Along with the application, he submitted the attested true copy of a birth certificate showing his date of birth to be 1.7.1994. Based upon the said information, a passport was issued to the petitioner. On expiry of the said passport on 26.11.2011, the petitioner applied for renewal of the passport. He also applied for correction of the date of birth on the ground that correct date of birth was 1.7.1993 and not 1.7.1994. Along with the application, he submitted another birth certificate disclosing his date of birth to be 1.7....
Arvind Kumar Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 02, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6597/2012 ARVIND KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. with Mrs.Sanjoli Mittal, Advocate. Versus UOI AND ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.R.V.Sinha, Adv.for R-1. Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Adv. with Ms.Pallav Pandey and Mr.Vardhaman Kaushik, Advocates for R-2/UPSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CM No.11098/2013 1. A large number of Original Applications have been decided by a Full Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal vide order dated May 09, 2011 and we find that the said order is a subject matter of challenge in not only the above captioned writ petition filed by Arvind Kumar but even by the writ petitioners of W.P.(C) No.4097/2011, W.P.(C) No.4616/2011, W.P.(C) No.7619/2011, W.P.(C) No.2176/2012, W.P.(C) No.2523/2012, W.P.(C) No.2524/2012, W.P.(C) No.2525/2012, W.P.(C) No.2526/2012, W.P.(C)...
Narender Kumar Sehgal Vs. Tal Ishikawa Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.10913/2011 in CS(OS) 993/2011 Date of Decision:2. d September, 2013 + # ! NARENDER KUMAR SEHGAL Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms. Sapna Sinha, Advocate versus $ * TAL ISHIKAWA LTD. AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Vaibhav Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advocate for Defendant Nos.2, 4 and 5 (applicants). Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Seema and Ms. Ritika Ahuja, Advocate for Defendant No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K. BHASIN, J: This order shall dispose off an application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure(in short C.P.C.) filed on behalf defendant nos.2, 4 and 5 for rejection of the plaint qua them only or for deleting their names from the array of parties being neither necessary not proper parties.2. The plaintiff was employed by M/s Reinz Gaskets Limited as a Sales Executive on 18th June, 1998 at a monthly salary of Rs.6000/plus HRA, conveyance allowance etc. This C...
Ms Pallavi Matai and ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:02. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5342/2013 & CM 11967/2013 MS PALLAVI MATAI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin and Mr. Ajay Talesar, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.V. Niren, CGSC for R-2/UOI Mr. Vaibhav Kalra with Ms. Sumedha Dang, Advs. for GGSIPU/R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court applied for MBBS Course of the respondent-Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU). The petitioners could not get admission during the first round of counselling. Vide notification dated 14.8.2013, the university declared the schedule of the second counselling for MBBS and BDS courses, fixing 16.8.2013 as the date of the second counselling, which was to start at 2 pm for MBBS Course and 4 pm for BDS course. The candidates seeking to participate in the second round of counselling were required to deposi...
Raj Kumar Jha Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :30. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :02. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 4953/2013 RAJ KUMAR JHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr I.C. Mishra, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv for DU CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The only issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether the answers contained in the answer key in respect of question numbers 94 and 110 in the LLB Entrance Examination, 2013, held by University of Delhi are incorrect and if so, whether the petitioner is entitled a fresh computation of his result and admission to the said course in the Academic Year 2013-14. The petitioner before this Court appeared in LLB Entrance Test of Faculty of Law, conducted by the respondents, for the academic year 2013-2014. In the result of the said examination, declared in June, 2013, the petitioner obtained 315 marks. Since the petitioner was not satisfied with the r...
Anil Khanna Vs. Geeta Khanna and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No. 4730/2011 in CS(OS) 2320/2010 Reserved on:7. h August, 2013 Decided on:2. d September, 2013 % ANIL KHANNA Through: versus GEETA KHANNA & ORS Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arun Khosla and Ms. Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates. ..... Defendants Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate Defendant Nos. 1& 3. Mr. R.K. Sachdeva, Advocate Defendant No. 2 Mr. Gaurav Dua, Advocate Defendant No.4. Mr. P.K. Mittal, Advocate Defendant No. 6/DDA. for for for for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By this application the Plaintiff seeks judgment against Defendant No. 4 in view of the admissions made in the written statement filed by the Defendant No.4. According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant No. 4 has admitted the following facts: i. The Plaintiff and Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 being co-owners of the suit property; and ii. Defendant No. 4 having been inducted into the suit property as tenant by the Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 at the back of the Plaintiff.2. Learned counse...
Mahipal Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 07, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 02, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1604/2002 MAHIPAL SINGH Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Ms.Nandita Rao, Advocate with Ms.Veronica Mohan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Having succeeded before the Central Administrative Tribunal in the challenge to the order dated February 05, 1998 which was upheld in the departmental appeal vide order dated May 08, 1998, by which order the petitioner was dismissed from service, only issue which arises for consideration in the writ petition is to the correctness of the direction issued by the Tribunal declining back wages for the period interregnum petitioner was dismissed from service till he was reinstated in service firstly by the Tribunal and secondly as a result of the penalty order being one...
South Asia Lpg Company Private Limited Vs. Competition Commission of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :02. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 4602/2013 and CM No.10571/2013 SOUTH ASIA LPG COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner Through: Dr.Abhishek M.Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amitabh Kumar, Ms.Divya Chaturvedi and Ms.Awantika Manohar, Advocates. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents Through:Mr.Rajeev Saxena with Ms.Toshika Katara, Advocates for R.1 and 2. Mr.A.N.Haksar, Senior Advocate with Mr.M.M. Sharma, Ms.Deepika Rajpal, Mr.Abhijit Mittal, Ms.Chitra Y.Parande and Mr.Shamik Narain, Advocates for R.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The only issue involved in this petition is as to whether the Competition Commission of India (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) is required to give notice or hearing to the person against whom an information is given or a reference is made, in terms of Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 before the Commission di...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »