Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaipal Singh and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~1, 11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : September 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5539/2013 JAIPAL SINGH AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 4258/2013 GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus + UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Yogesh Yogi, Adv. for Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Adv. for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 5059/2013 RAJ KANWAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .... Respondents Through: Mr.Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr.S.Qureshi, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO W P (C) 5539/13, WP(C) 4258/13 & WP(C) 5059/13 1 of 15 GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 4258/2013 It is to be noted that by an error, presence of counsels on the 9 th July, 2013 and 3rd September, 2013 has been erroneously recorded. Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advo...
Jaya Ganguli Vs. Director of Education and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos. 344/2009, 430/2010, 345/2009, 346/2009, 347/2009, 348/2009, 8063/2009, 8064/2009 and 9255/2009 % 1. 6th September, 2013 W.P.(C) 344/2009 JAYA GANGULI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mudgal, Advocate for respondent No.2.2. W.P.(C) 430/2010 HEMANT KUMAR SINGH Through: versus ..... Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mudgal, Advocate for respondent No.2.3. W.P.(C) 345/2009 BHASWATI MUKHERJEE ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Mudgal, Advocate for respondent No.2.4. W.P.(C) 346/2009 KASHLYA MALVIYA Through: W.P.(C) No.344 /2009 & conn. matters ..... Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate. Page 1 of 6 versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun...
Logic Transware India Pvt Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~9. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 2654/2013 Date of decision:5. h September, 2013 LOGIC TRANSWARE INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rohit Kapur, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. H.K. Sharma, Dy. Commissioner (Customs). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner by way of this writ petition has challenged order dated 24th January, 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Imports and General Commissionerate), New Customs House, New Delhi. By the impugned order the petitioner has been prohibited from transacting business under Regulation 9(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 within the jurisdiction of Delhi Commissionerate with immediate effect. The petitioner has also been directed to surrender his original licence and cards issued to them.2. During the cour...
M/S Well Protect Manpower Services Vs. Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5615/2013 & CM No.12434/2013 M/S WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES ..... Petitioner versus LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI HOSPITAL & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Tarkeshwar Nath with Mr Saurabh Kumar Tuteja. For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel & Ms Sana Ansari. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner initially sought the following prayers:(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) W.P.(C)5615/2013 Direct the respondent to open the technical bid of the petitioner. Declare that the petitioner is technically qualified. Direct the respondents to open the financial bid of the petitioner if it is found technically qualified. Declare the tendering process arising out of the subject NIT as null and void. Call for the records arising of the subj...
Sagar Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :5. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :6. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 750/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.1033/2011 SAGAR ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant Sagar to impugn a judgment dated 22.07.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 20/2010 arising out of FIR No. 316/2009 PS Khajuri Khas by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 392 IPC read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 23.07.2010, he was directed to undergo RI for seven years.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 10.11.2009 at 04.45 A.M. at Chand Bagh Puliya, Karawal Nagar Road, Delhi, he with his associate robbed Gyanesh Singh of ` 700/- at the point of knife and also caused injuries to him. The police machinery was set...
Sonia Mehta Vs. Dayanand Model School and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3061/2011 6th September, 2013 % SONIA MEHTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.N. Pareek, Advocate. Versus DAYANAND MODEL SCHOOL AND ORS. Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner by this writ petition prays for regularization of her appointment with the respondent No.1-school. Petitioner also claims consequential payments with respect to salaries and other benefits which are awarded to teachers in a school.2. I have recently decided two cases and ratios of which cases will squarely apply to the facts of the present case also. First case which will apply is of Hamdard Public School Vs. Directorate of Education and Anr. in W.P.(C) No.8652/2011 decided on 25.7.2013 wherein I have said that ordinarily a teacher would be confirmed after a period of three years in probation unless there are valid reasons and which are justiciabl...
Kumar Gorav Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on : September 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5609/2013 & CM 12425/2013 KUMAR GORAV ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. K.K.Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajiv Bakshi and Mr. Bhanita Patowary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through : ..... Respondent Sh. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Sh. Utsav Sidhu and Ms. Gurjinder Kaur, Advocates along with Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Sr. Accountant, for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI (OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Shri Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC accepts notice and states that the petition can be disposed-off finally.2. We have heard counsels for the parties.3. The Writ Petition challenges the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) dated 23rd May, 2013 in O.A. No. 1852/2012 which upheld the termination of the W.P.(C) No.5609/2013 Page 1 petitioner from his employment as Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS) with the respondent (employer). On 4th January 2012 the...
Gajraj Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~1, 11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : September 06, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5539/2013 JAIPAL SINGH AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC for UOI W.P.(C) 4258/2013 GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus + UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Yogesh Yogi, Adv. for Mr.Joginder Sukhija, Adv. for R-1 to R-4 W.P.(C) 5059/2013 RAJ KANWAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS .... Respondents Through: Mr.Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr.S.Qureshi, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO W P (C) 5539/13, WP(C) 4258/13 & WP(C) 5059/13 1 of 15 GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 4258/2013 It is to be noted that by an error, presence of counsels on the 9 th July, 2013 and 3rd September, 2013 has been erroneously recorded. Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advo...
India Trade Promotion Organisation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
$~21&8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 167/2012 & 168/2012 Date of decision:6. h September, 2013 INDIA TRADE PROMOTION ORGANISATION ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha & Ms. Bhoomika Choudhury, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): These appeals by India Trade Promotion Organisation under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) relate to Assessment Years 1989-90 and 1990-91. By order dated 22nd August, 2013, the following substantial questions of law were framed in these two appeals: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in denying interest of Rs.1,60,30,495/-, which it is claimed was payable alongwith the refund? Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in denying interest of Rs.41,11,644/-, which it is claimed wa...
Sh. Kaushik Paik and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: September 6, 2013 + WP(C) No.116/2013 SH. KAUSHIK PAIK AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Ms.Sahilla Lamba, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.C.K.Sharma, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT(Oral) 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioners had approached the Tribunal for a direction to grant them grade pay of Rs.4800 (PB-2) and Rs.5400/- (PB-3) upon completion of four years as per the provisions of part-B Section II, serial No.1(1) of CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 w.e.f. 1st January, 2006. The petitioners are working in Indian Coast Guard Organization which was established in the year 1977 by virtue of a decision of the Central Government. The said organisation was to have its own regular composite cadre of civilians for the headquarters and lower forma...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »