Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax-iii Vs. Arcotech Ltd (Formerly Sks Ltd.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.71/2013 Date of decision:12. h September, 2013. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus ARCOTECH LTD (FORMERLY SKS LTD.) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Saurabh Seth & Ms. Kanchan Yadav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): In this appeal, which pertains to Assessment Year 2003-04 and arises out of order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (tribunal, for short) dated 29th June, 2012, on the last date of hearing the following substantial question of law was framed:Whether the tribunal was justified in deleting penalty on additions made on account of loss of sale of investment and vehicles, which was wrongly claimed as business loss and expenditure disallowed under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961?. As is apparent from the question, tribunal has allowed the...
Dr. Ranjan Chandra Vs. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 1662/2007 DR. RANJAN CHANDRA ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Nilansh Gaur, Advocate. versus MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE ..... Respondent Through : Sh. R.V. Sinha, Sh. R.N. Singh and Sh. A.S. Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 30.10.2006, dismissing his Review Application, R.A. No.153/2006. The petitioner had claimed directions that the period of his ad-hoc service, i.e. effective from 15.09.1993 till he was appointed to the post of Specialist Grade-II (Radio Diagnosis) with effect from 03.07.1998 after selection through the regular channel, should be treated as regular.2. The petitioner responded to an advertisement issued sometime in June 1993 in the Employment News. The respondents/Central Government, ac...
Ms. Rajesh Devi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
$~ 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 7123/2012 Date of decision:12. h September, 2013 MS. RAJESH DEVI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. N.L. Bareja, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Geeta Sharma, Ms. Sadhvi Shahi and Ms. Vanessa Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Pursuant to the order passed on 1st August, 2013, the petitioner has been subjected to a medical examination by the Board appointed by the Commandant, Army Hospital (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt., New Delhi. The original report has been perused by learned counsel of both sides which certifies medical fitness of the petitioner.2. The present matter has to be considered in the light of this medical report.3. The issues raised in the present matter are within a narrow factual matrix. WP(C) No.7123/2012 page 1 o4. The petitioners husband late Constable/GD Sumer Singh, the employee of the CRPF died...
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Shanta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. h September, 2013 MAC.A. 609/2012 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ......Appellant Through: Mr. S.K.Ray and Mr.Amitava Poddar, Advocates. Versus SMT. SHANTA & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Nitin Joshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Pushp Saini, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant/Insurance Company is assailing the judgement dated 02.03.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs.8,51,528/- as compensation with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization in favour of the respondents/claimants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has argued that, the deceased Sumit Kumar was a young boy of 19 years at the date of accident, i.e., 19.11.2009, who left behind his widowed mother and three sisters. He submit...
Kangra Adarsh Cooperative Group Housing Society Lt Vs. Delhi Co-operat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3505/2013 and CM No.12774/2013 KANGRA ADARSH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Prema Priyadarshini, Advocate. versus DELHI CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Gautam Sharma, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred by the Kangra Adarsh Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. impugning the award passed on 24.10.2011 by the learned Arbitrator and the order dated 18.3.2013 passed by the Delhi Cooperative Tribunal.2. The only issue which arises before us in this writ petition is whether the Petitioner Society could charge any gate money/entry fee/development fund/transfer fee/common good fund from the Respondent No.2. W.P.(C) 3505/2013 Sharma filed a claim petition before the Registrar Cooperative Societies wherein it was claimed by hi...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Archna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 533/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. Versus ARCHNA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 24.02.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted the compensation as under: Expenses on medical treatment : Rs.4,20,000/- Compensation on account of loss of Dependency : Rs.7,20,000/- Funeral Expenses : Rs. On Account of Loss of Love & Affection : Rs. 10,000/- On account of contribution towards loss of Estate : Rs. 10,000/- Total MAC.APP.533/2012 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has argued on two grounds, firstly, the learned Tribunal has wrongly granted 50% towards future prospects. Secondly, though the widow of the deceas...
Dr. Sukh Pal Singh Vs. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (icar) ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A) 1. This is second round of litigation. Earlier aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not appointing him as Head of Regional Centre, NBSS and LUP, New Delhi, the applicant had filed OA-3162/2011. This was decided in favour of the applicant on 23.04.2012. The operative part of the order was as follows:- 11. On the basis of the above discussions, we are of the opinion that there was no valid basis for the respondents in not issuing the appointment letter in the name of the applicant for appointment as Head of NBSS and LUP, Regional Centre, Delhi. The applicant has scored the highest marks as per the parameters of the ASRB. The marks were much more than then the marks allotted to Respondent No. 7 and the ASRB has recommended the name of the applicant for appointment on the post. The appointment was no given to the applicant on the ground that the name of the applicant was not recommended by the ASRB but the appointment was not given to him on the ground ...
Gaurav Singh and Others Vs. Uoi
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A) 1. This O.A. has been filed seeking the following relief:- (A) By an appropriate Order or Direction the respondents be directed to prepare/recast the seniority list dated 26.04.2010 as per the judgment dated 27.11.2012 of the Apex Court in the case of N.R. Parmar before effecting any further promotion to the post of Income Tax Officers. Further, the seniority list of Inspectors under the covering letter dated 26.04.2010 be declared as defunct and inoperative immediately on the pronouncement of the judgement of the Honble Apex Court on 27.11.2012. (B) By an appropriate Order or Direction the respondents be directed to recast/modify the seniority list dated 26.04.2010 as per the judgment dated 27.11.2012 of the Apex Court in the case of N.R. Parmar within a time frame and place the applicants at the appropriate place in that seniority list with all consequential benefits. (C) That respondents be directed to conduct Review DPCs based on the said recast seniorit...
Ankit Roy Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2013 LPA 587/2013 & CM Nos.12374-76/2013 ANKIT ROY .... Appellant versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Laliet Kumar alongwith Mr Deepak Vohra. For the Respondent : Mr Mukul Talwar alongwith Mr S. Mohapatra. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.The present appeal has been filed challenging the common judgment delivered by a learned Single Judge of this court on 07.08.2013 in W.P.(C) 4748/2013 and other connected writ petitions. The appellant had filed the writ petition being W.P.(C) 4748/2013, inter-alia, challenging the action of the respondent university in not considering the appellant as a candidate belonging to a Scheduled Caste for the purposes of admission to the B.Tech Programme for the academic session 2013-14 against seats reserved for Delhi. The learned Sing...
TaskinuddIn and ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 05.07.2013 Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5812/2011 TASKINUDDIN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Rakesh Bhugra, M. Tabishzia, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to pay the petitioners suitable amount of compensation with interest, for loss of lives and injuries suffered in a tragic fire incident in a factory/ business premises of respondent No.2.2. An unfortunate fire incident took place on 25.01.2011 in the premises of M/s Amazing Creation Garment Export Factory at Tughlakabad area of South Delhi, w...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »