Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shashi Bhushan Tiwari and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement pronounced on:16.09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5852 of 2013 SHASHI BHUSHAN TIWARI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. T. Hasan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.CM No.12906/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.5852/2013 & CM No.12905/2013 (Directions) The guidelines dated 22.9.2011 for Selection and Grant of Guide License to Regional Level Tourist Guides (RLG)-2011 to the extent they are relevant read as under: 4.2 Entrance Test:4. 2.1 An entrance test would be conducted to evaluate the general intelligence and suitability of applicants for admission to guide training. The entrance test would be of three hours duration and cover the following subjects: (a) Knowledge of monuments / tourism destinations In the region 100 marks (b) Indian history & Indian Culture 100 marks (c) General Knowledge - 100 marks Note: (i) For...
Ved Kapoor Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:06. 09.2013 Judgement pronounced on:16.09.2013 + W.P.(C) 168 of 2011 & W.P.(C) 7725 of 2011 VED KAPOOR Through: .Petitioner Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Wad, Ms. Kanika Bhutani, Ms. Niharika Bapnu & Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .Respondents Ms. Rajdeepa Behura & Ms. Monica Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.M/s. Hitkari China Limited (for short the Company), in which the petitioner before this Court claims to be a Director till 9.4.2005, applied to the Joint Director General, Foreign Trade (for short JDGFT) on 8.5.1997, for grant of advance licence for import of certain goods. An advance licence dated 28.8.1997 was issued to the Company allowing import to the extent of CIF value of Rs.50,38,267/- (US$ 139952/-), subject to the condition that the Company would fulfill export obligations for Rs.1,24,25,099/- within eighteen (18) months from the date...
Vicky Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :29. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 1355/2012 VICKY Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate with Mr. Harish Khinehi, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal stands disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.524/2012 titled Shiva @ Uan vs. State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 16 2013/tr...
Veena Suri Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement pronounced on:16.09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5861 of 2013 & CM No.12921 of 2013 VEENA SURI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajkumar Sherawat & Mr. Rajesh Goswami, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel, GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Vide communication dated 29.8.2013, the Sub-Registrar (V) referring to an application moved by Shri Ramesh Chander Luther, Shri Raj Kumar Luther, Shri Ravi Shanker Luther & Shri Vikram Luther, seeking registration of a Will executed by late Shri Charanji Lal S/o late Shri Nand Lal asked the petitioner to get a stay order or direction issued by a Court within fifteen (15) days of the issue of the said letter and informed that if she failed to provide the said status her objection shall be treated as null & void and the Sub-Registrar would be inclined to register the documents without any further intimation.2. Earlier the petitione...
Shiva @ Uan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :29. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 524/2012 SHIVA @ UAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate with Mr. Harish Khinehi, Advocate. versus STATE Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A. 1355/2012 VICKY Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate with Mr. Harish Khinehi, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Shiva @ Uan (A-1), Kallu @ Veeru (since expired) and Vicky (A-2) were sent for trial in case FIR No. 121/2009 PS Pahar Ganj on the allegations that on 10.05.2009 at 10.15 P.M. at Sadar Thana Road near corner of Street No.8, Muttani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, they in furtherance of common intention caused injuries to Vicky and Monu in an attempt to murder them. Kallu @ Veeru expired during pendency of tiral and proceedings against him were dropped. A-1 and A-2 were held guilty for committ...
Cholamandalam Ms General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Sudha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:16. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 662/2011 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INS. CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. Versus SUDHA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Kr. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 13.04.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.23,93,840/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition, till the date of realization.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that ld. Tribunal has fell in error while considering the salary of the deceased as Rs.11,500/- per month without verifying the salary certificate.3. Ld. Counsel further submitted that said certificate has not been proved by the employer of the deceased as to whether the deceased was actually drawing the said salary of Rs.11,500/- per month. Therefore...
Deepak JaIn Vs. Sukhvinder Kaur and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 428/2010 DEEPAK JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Santha Devi Raman, Adv. Versus SUKHVINDER KAUR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Adv. for R1 to R5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant appeal, appellant has assailed the award dated 17.04.2010, whereby, ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.9,30,440/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the deposit of the amount.2. It is pertinent to mention here that while awarding the compensation, ld. Tribunal has established that the accident took place due the contributory negligence and the liability of 60% and 40% has been fastened respectively on the appellant and deceased.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the ld. Tribunal has not considered the evidence on record while fastening the liability of ...
Urmila and ors Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:16th September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 958/2012 URMILA & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate. Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Mannu Mohan Bansal, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms.Tania Ahlawat for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for Respondent No.3/DTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred for enhancement of the award dated 15.05.2012, whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs.10,05,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum in favour of the appellants/claimants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued that though the learned Tribunal has considered salary of the deceased as Rs.10,000/- per month, however, failed to grant any compensation towards future prospects as the age of the deceased was 20 y...
Sh. Ram Kumar Vs. Sh. S.K. Gulati
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h September, 2013 % + RFA No.438/2013 SH. RAM KUMAR Through: .....Appellant Mr. G.S. Raghav and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advs. Versus SH. S.K. GULATI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddhart Aggarwal, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J Caveat No.810/2013.1. The counsel for the caveator appears. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.14445/2013 (for exemption).2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.3. The application stands disposed of. RFA No.438/2013 & CM No.14444/2013 (for stay).4. This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 8 th August, 2013 of ejectment of the appellant from shop No.103-B, 1st Floor, Meghdoot Building, 94 Nehru Place, New Delhi earlier in the tenancy of the appellant/defendant and for recovery of mesne profits/damages for use and occupation from the appellant/defendant.5. The counsel for the appellant/defendant on enquiry states that co...
Devender @ D.K. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:16.9.2013 + CRL.A. 1154/2010 DEVENDER @ D K ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Anita Abraham, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J (oral) 1 On 02.4.2006, DD No.54B (Ex.PW-3/A) was recorded in the local police station P.S. Shalimar Bagh which was to the effect that at 6.37 PM on the same day at Kela Gown, Railway Colony one unknown person had received injuries who had been removed to the hospital by the PCR. 2 H.C.Mohd. Aftab (PW-17) posted in the PCR North-West Zone, Model Town had removed the injured (Sachin) to the BJRM from the aforenoted place of incident and had informed the local police pursuant to which Ex.PW-3/A had been registered. 3 Investigation was entrusted to ASI Kartar Singh (PW-10) who along with Constable Satender (PW-2) reached the spot. On reaching the spot they learnt tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »