Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Nath Madan Through Lrs. Vs. Promila Chopra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: September 17, 2013 RC. Rev. No.325/2013, C.M. No.13619/2013 RAM NATH MADAN THROUGH LRS ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Tara Chand Sharma, Adv. versus PROMILA CHOPRA & ORS. Through None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the eviction order dated 3rd May, 2013 passed by the ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in an eviction petition filed by the respondents against the petitioner in respect of a room in the property bearing No.53/27, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi -110005 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises).2. Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of the present petitioner are that the respondents filed the eviction petition stating that they bonafidely require the same for their occupation as ...
Arjun and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2830/2013 % Date of decision: September 17, 2013 ARJUN & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Teotia & Ms. Anupriya Yadav, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. SI Bal Singh, P.S. Mandawali. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* 1. This is a petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR no.378/2010 u/s 307/324/341/34 IPC registered with Police Station Mandawali and the proceedings emanating therefrom which are stated to be pending before the ld.ASJ, East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners/accused persons who are facing trial before the ld.ASJ for committing offence punishable u/s 307/324/341/34 IPC.3. The allegations against the petitioners are that on 13th July, 2010 at about 9 pm, house of Babloo, worker of respondent no.2 went to repair fridge at the petitioners i.e., C-23, Gali no.2, Chander Vihar, Delhi. Af...
Sh. Bhoop Singh Vs. Director General, Cpwd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. 09.2013 + LPA6862013, C.M. APPL. 14501/2013 (for stay), 14502/2013 (for exemption) and 14503/2013 (for condonation of delay) SH. BHOOP SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Sh. A.K. Bajpai with Sh. M.F. Khan, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, CPWD ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Saqib, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. Issue notice. Mr. Saqib, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent. With the consent of learned counsel, the matter was heard finally. 2 The Appellant, Shri Bhoop Singh, is challenging an order of a learned Single Judge dated 11.04.2013 passed in W.P.(C) 1737/2011. Briefly, the facts of this case are that on 01.09.1981, the appellant was engaged as a muster roll employee, as a carpenter in the Central Public Works Department (hereinafter CPWD.) Subsequently, on LPA6862013 Page 1 03.06.1989, he was regularized. On 18....
National Students Front and anr. Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. 09.2013 + LPA6912013 NATIONAL STUDENTS FRONT & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Sh. B.S. Narwal, Petitioner in person. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Mohinder. J.S. Rupal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. This is an appeal from an order of a learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) 5262/2012, filed by the National Students Front (hereinafter NSF) and one Mr. B.S. Narwal, with Mr. Narwal representing himself and the NSF. The writ petition claimed the following relief:[A]. - MAY THIS HONOURABLE COURT BE PLEASED TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO QUASH an impugned decision of the Jawaharlal Nehru University ViceChancellor which is numbered as JNU/LC/ADMN-IV/2260 dated 29th MAY2012read with an Office Order Number 117 of 2006 dated 20th DECEMBER2006along with such other consequential orders, so that...
Jasbir Singh Vs. Dy Commissioner of Police Crime Branch (Eow)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL.) 1239/2013 and CRL.M.A. 11559-11560/2013 Decided on 17.09.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : JASBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advocate versus DY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CRIME BRANCH (EOW) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.), GNCTD with Mr.Sahil Mongia and Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocates CORAM HONBLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.PC praying inter alia for quashing of FIR No.133/2013 lodged under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC at Police Station: Kalkaji, New Delhi.2. The prayers made in the present petition are premised on an argument that any FIR registered on the complaint of a General Power of Attorney holder of the complainant, in the absence of knowledge of the subject matter of the complaint ...
icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Raj Kesari Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 914/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. Versus RAJ KESARI DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.K. Sinha, Adv. for R1 to R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant appeal, appellant has assailed the impugned award dated 07.07.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.13,05,640/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition, till the date of realization.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued the instant appeal on two grounds; firstly, the claimants failed to prove that the deceased was working as a plumber and he was earning Rs.10,000/- per month. Despite that the ld. Tribunal has assessed the salary of the deceased as Rs.6,448/- as per minimum wages for a skilled person.3. The second ground argued by the l...
Well Protect Manpower Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Transport Infrastru ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement pronounced on:16.09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5444 of 2013 & CM No.12164 of 2013 (Stay) WELL PROTECT MANPOWER SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath & Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advs. versus DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Zubeda Begu, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Ms. Sana Ansari & Mr. Prem Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner has been providing security personnel at ISBT, Kashmere Gate pursuant to the work awarded to it on 30.9.2011. Initially, the work was awarded for twelve (12) months only but later on it was extended up to 30.9.2013, vide communication dated 28.9.2012. Vide letter dated 16.8.2012, the Estate Manager, DTIDC Limited, Kashmere Gate informed the petitioner that the work of comprehensive maintenance of ISBT had been awarded to BVG India Limited, which was expected to start the work shortly and, therefore, ...
Population Services International Vs. Rajesh Dhiman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 3422/2012 POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Abhay Singh and Ms Veena Singh, Advs. versus RAJESH DHIMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr Vineet Chadda and Mr Mukesh Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondent Rajesh Dhiman, who was working with the petitioner Population Services International, sought certain information from the petitioner under Right to Information Act. The stand taken by the petitioner was that since it is not a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Act, it was not amenable to the provisions of the said Act. Being aggrieved, the respondent approached the Central not CIS/SG/A/2011/003380. Information Commission by way of Appeal Allowing the appeal vide impugned order dated 23.04.2012, the Commission, inter alia, held as under:- From the submissions of the Respondent, it is observed that the fund...
Directorate General of Security and anr Vs. Harender
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement pronounced on:16.09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5959 of 2013 DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SECURITY AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ruchir Mishra & Mr. Sanjiv Saxena, Advs. versus HARENDER Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Adv. with Respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The respondent before this Court is working with Aviation Research Centre, which is part of the Cabinet Secretariat. The respondent applied to the CPIO of the Cabinet Secretariat seeking photocopies of the proceedings and minutes of the DCPs held from 2000 to 2009 including of the file notings and correspondence led to the above-referred DPCs. The CPIO of the Cabinet Secretariat responded by claiming that the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short RTI Act) did not apply to the Cabinet Secretariat. EA-II Section, since it was included in the Second Schedule appended to the RTI Act. The view taken by the CPIO was also maintained by the ...
Chander Prakash Meena Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :12. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :16. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 8221/2011 CHANDER PRAKASH MEENA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. H.S. Meena, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court took admission in B.Tech (Civil) course of the respondent-Jamia Millia Islamia University in August, 2002. The maximum permissible time period for completion of the said course, as per Ordinance of the respondent-University, is seven years. The aforesaid duration came to be completed by the petitioner in the year 2009. In the 08th Semester Examination held in the year 2009, the petitioner got compartment in as many as four papers and failed in one paper. As per the rules of the University, a student can appear in compartment examinations in a maximum of four papers. Accordingly, he appeared in compartment in four paper...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »