Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Ved Prakash Yadav Vs. Shri Narayan Das (Deceased) Through: Legal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 09.2013 FAO(OS) 424/2013 SHRI VED PRAKASH YADAV ..... Appellant Versus SHRI NARAYAN DAS (DECEASED) THROUGH: LEGAL HEIRS &ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr R.M.Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. With Ms Aastha Dhawan, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.14539/2013 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO (OS) 424/2013 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 27.08.2013 passed by a learned single Judge of this court in I.A. Nos. 22522/2012 and 2963/2013. The said applications were filed in CS(OS) No.1042/2005 which has been filed by the appellant / plaintiff. I.A. No.22522/2012 was an application seeking restoration of the said suit. I.A. No.2963/2013 was an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment of the plaint.2. The sai...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Asha and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 352/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Soumik Mazumdar, Adv. versus ASHA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Mainnie, Adv. for R1 to R5. Mr. Naresh C. Sharma and Mr. Chetan Swarup, Advs. for R6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 31.01.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation as under:1. Loss of Dependency (Rs.4,600x12x18) = Rs. 9,93,600/2. Loss of Consortium = Rs.10,000/3. Loss of Love and Affection = Rs.1,25,000/4. For funeral expenses = Rs.10,000/5. Loss of Estate = Rs.10,000/6. For Medical expenses = Rs.25,000/_________________________________________________ Total = Rs.11,73,600/(Rupees Eleven Lacs Seventy Three Thousand and six hundred only) _________________________________________________ 2. Present appeal has been filed on the gro...
Manoj Kumar and Others Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:17.9.2013 + CRL.A. 1367/2011 MANOJ KUMAR AND OTHERS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Sanjay Suri, Rishabh Relan and Mr. Dinesh Malik, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J (oral) 1 On the intervening night of 28-29.06.2007 at about midnight in a gali opposite Raj STD, Dhirpur village, Delhi the four appellants before this Court namely Manoj, Mahender, Ravinder (presently lodged in judicial custody) and Ritu (since released on bail) in furtherance of their common intention had committed the murder of deceased Manish @ Guddu. Version of the prosecution was unfolded in the testimony of the eye-witness Rakhi (PW-11). The role attributed to appellant Manoj was that he had caused stab injuries to the deceased while he was caught hold of by Mahender and Ravinder; Rakhi had exhorted the co-accuse...
Sh. G.L. Gupta Vs. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.197/2012 17th September, 2013 % SH. G.L. GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Jain, Advocate. Versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition, two reliefs are claimed by the petitioner who was an employee of the respondent and who superannuated on 31.10.2011. First relief which is claimed is the challenge to the continuation after 90 days of the suspension order dated 29.9.2010. Second relief which is claimed is for release of terminal benefits of pension, commutation of pension, gratuity and earned leave encashment alongwith interest accrued thereon.2. Though, the first relief which is claimed as per the relief clause in the writ petition, is the challenge to the suspension order dated 29.9.2010 itself, however what is argued before me on b...
Ms Naseem Begum Vs. Shafi Mohd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 16/2013 MS NASEEM BEGUM Through : versus ..... Appellant Mr.Manoj Bansal, Adv. SHAFI MOHD. ..... Respondent Mr.Bashir Ahmed, Adv. Through : Date of Decision :17. h September, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.No.10353/2013 (delay) 1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act moved on behalf of the Appellant praying for condonation of 146 days delay in filing the appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.3. Application stands disposed of. C.M.No.10354/2013 (Exemption) 1. Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. MAT (F.C.) No.16/2013 1. The sufferings of the Appellant seem to be unending. First illiteracy, then poverty aggravated with a broken marriage, question of survival with a daughter to take care of, was s...
Sanjiv JaIn Vs. Tajom Taloh, Registrar Co-op. Socieity
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 675/2013 ..... Petitioner SANJIV JAIN Through: Mr. S.S. Jain, Advocate versus TAJOM TALOH, REGISTRAR CO-OP. SOCIETY..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amiet Andlay, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.13570/2013 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CONT.CAS(C) 675/2013 1. The petitioner has invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court alleging non-compliance of directions issued by this Court on 21.07.2010 in W.P.(C) No.5398/97. The said directions were to the following effect:In our considered view, there can be no doubt that in view of the restoration of the membership of the petitioners a fresh seniority list would have to be prepared as per the original membership. We are also informed that there is only one authentic draw of lots held under the supervision of DDA on 10.8.1988. The Regist...
Sh. Anil Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4930 /2010 17th September, 2013 % SH. ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Talwar, Advocate with Mr. S. Mohapatra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks the relief of quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 4.12.2009 passed by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (hereinafter referred to as the respondent University represented by the respondent Nos.2 and 3).2. By the impugned order it has been held that the petitioner was not entitled to be appointed to the post of technical assistant/workshop instructor because petitioner fell in the unreserved category for which six posts were advertised, and all the six posts were duly filled in. Effectively what the impugned order states is that the ...
Tilak Raj Gogia Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : July 5, 2013 Decided on: September 17, 2013 + FAO(OS) 304/2013, CM 9839/2013 to 9841/2013 TILAK RAJ GOGIA Through: Appellant in person. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI 1 This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18th February, 2013 whereby the arbitral award granting the appellant only Rs. 33,569/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from 30th November, 2010 till date of payment towards EMD Rs.13,069/- + PG Rs.20,500/- was upheld. The appellant / claimant, however, had claimed in excess of Rs. 13.3 lakh, plus damages with interest, which were declined.2. The facts are that the appellant was awarded a contract for annual repair and maintenance of the Government of India office building and other allied buildings at NH-4, Faridabad. The work was ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Mohini Jha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 583/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate for Respondent No.7. AND + MAC.APP. 595/2011 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. Versus MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for Respondent No.9/Insurance Company (NIACI). HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeals are filed by both the appellants/Insurance Companies against the impugned award dated 21.02.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.27,60,000/- in favour of the respondents/claimants along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.2. It is noted that one common ground is ta...
Mohini Jha and ors Vs. Jamal Khan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 789/2011 MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr.Maruf Khan, Advocate. Versus JAMAL KHAN & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for Respondent No.6. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal is preferred for enhancement of the impugned award dated 21.02.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted a sum of Rs. 27,60,000/- as compensation in favour of the appellants/claimants along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants/claimants has submitted that the appellants have examined PW5 Sh. Surender Nagar, Executive Assistant of Express Trade Tower, Film City, Sector 16, Noida, who deposed that their office had issued a letter to the de...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »