Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India Vs. Kanwar Deep Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :17. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 2232/2012 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus RAJESH BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: + W.P.(C) 8932/2011 & CM No.20166/2011 MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus PRAVEEN VAID ..... Respondent Through: + In person. W.P.(C) 3421/2012 & CM No.7235/2012 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus KANWAR DEEP SINGH Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. K. Mahajan, Adv. W.P.(C) 1263/2012 & CM No.2745/2012 UNION OF INDIATHROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus J...
United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Mohini Jha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 + MAC.APP. 595/2011 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. Versus MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for Respondent No.9/Insurance Company (NIACI). HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.For detailed order see MAC.A. 583/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.SEPTEMBER 17 2013 sb/jg...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Sahidan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 631/2012 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus SAHIDAN & ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. Alamgir, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the award dated 09.05.2012 whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.8,61,232/with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of DAR proceedings till the date of payment.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has fairly conceded that during the trial it was agreed by the counsels for the Insurance Company and the claimants that no evidence is required to be lead on behalf of the parties; and the case can be decided on the basis of verified DAR proceedings filed by the IO.3. Therefore, she is not pressing other issues raised in the instant appeal, except the issue that ld. Tribunal has wrong...
Magnum Aviation (Uk) Ltd. Vs. Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :12. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :17. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 4201/2010 MAGNUM AVIATION (UK) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ashim Vachher, Mr Pawash Piyush, Advs versus PAWAN HANS HELICOPTERS LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Lalit Bhasin, Ms Ratna D. Dhingra and Ms Bhavna Dhami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The respondent-Pawan Hans Helicopter Limited (PHHL) placed an order with the petitioner company M/s Magnum Aviation (UK) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the UK Company) for import of two RMI Board for Civil Aircraft Avionics. The goods were to be shipped CIF and the petitioner was responsible to deliver the same to PHHL. The petitioner company procured the goods from M/s South East Aerospace of Australia. However, the said company, instead of shipping to PHHL, shipped them to M/s Magnum Aviation Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Indian Company). Since the petitioner was r...
Ram Dhawan @ Ramdev Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. NO. 67/2009 Date of Decision:17. h September, 2013 + # ! RAM DHAWAN @ RAMDEV ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate versus $ * STATE ..... Respondent Through:Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: This is a case of rape of a minor daughter by her father and the appellant herein is the father who stands convicted for having raped his minor daughter and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.2. Honble Supreme Court in the year 2006 in a judgment reported as 2006 Crl.L.J.139, State vs. Asha Ram had made the following observations while reversing the judgment of acquittal by the High Court in a case of rape of a girl by her father:1. There can never be more graver and heinous crime than the father being charged of raping his own daughter. He not only delicts the law but it is a betrayal of trust. T...
Union of India Through Ministry of External Affair Vs. Rajesh Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :17. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 2232/2012 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus RAJESH BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: + W.P.(C) 8932/2011 & CM No.20166/2011 MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus PRAVEEN VAID ..... Respondent Through: + In person. W.P.(C) 3421/2012 & CM No.7235/2012 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus KANWAR DEEP SINGH Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. K. Mahajan, Adv. W.P.(C) 1263/2012 & CM No.2745/2012 UNION OF INDIATHROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus J...
New India Assurance Co Ltd. Vs. Mohini Jha and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:3. d September, 2013 Judgment delivered on:17. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 583/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate. Versus MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate for Respondent No.7. AND + MAC.APP. 595/2011 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Advocate. Versus MOHINI JHA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for Respondent No.9/Insurance Company (NIACI). HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeals are filed by both the appellants/Insurance Companies against the impugned award dated 21.02.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.27,60,000/- in favour of the respondents/claimants along with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.2. It is noted that one common ground is ta...
Union of India Through Ministry of External Affair Vs. Jerald Rebello
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :17. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 2232/2012 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus RAJESH BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: + W.P.(C) 8932/2011 & CM No.20166/2011 MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus PRAVEEN VAID ..... Respondent Through: + In person. W.P.(C) 3421/2012 & CM No.7235/2012 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus KANWAR DEEP SINGH Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. K. Mahajan, Adv. W.P.(C) 1263/2012 & CM No.2745/2012 UNION OF INDIATHROUGH MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Roychaudhuri & Mr. Amit Panigrahi, Advs. versus J...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Lal Chand and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:17. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 5468/2011 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv with Mrs Biji Rajesh, Adv. versus LAL CHAND AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Praven Chaturvedi, Adv for R-1 Mr Javed M. Rao, Adv for R-2 Mr Ajay Verma, Adv for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) There is a dispute between the petitioner-MCD and respondent No.1-Lal Chand with respect to title of plot No. 286-287, Lajwanti Garden, New Delhi. According to the petitioner, the said plot, which was a park, was handed over to it by the Horticulture Department of DDA on 06.06.1988, for being maintained as a park. The case of respondent No.1-Lal Chand, on the other hand, is that the aforesaid property was purchased by him from one Mr Ajit Singh, attorney of four persons, namely, Rohtash Singh, Surender Kumar, Rajender Singh and Lachho Devi, by way of a sale deed executed in the ye...
All India Audit and Accounts Officers Asociation a Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:10. 09.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:17. 09.2013 + W.P. (C) 2698/2013 ALL INDIA AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS OFFICERS ASOCIATION AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joginder Sukhija, CGSC on behalf of R-1&3 with Mr. Yogesh Yogi, Advocate. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for CAG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 This writ petition challenges the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 10.12.2012 in O.A. 731/2012, where the CAT held, inter alia, that Senior Audit and Senior Accounts Officers of the petitioner association cannot be granted Group A status under the existing legal framework, but rather, that the matter is to be resolved by Cabinet.2. The cadre of Senior Audit Officers and Senior Accounts Officers was created by the Government of India in 1992 by upgrading 80...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »