Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri K.M. Vaghela Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5110/1998 30th September, 2013 % SHRI K.M. VAGHELA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Respondents. Ms. Geeta Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Saadhvi Shahi, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner, who was previously an employee of the Food Corporation of India (FCI)/respondent No.2, and who thereafter joined the Central Government, Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies/respondent no.1, seeks the relief of joining of his services rendered with FCI to the service period with the respondent No.1/Union of India through the Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies for the purpose of grant of pension.2. That there is a circular dated 17.10.1984 of the respondent No.1 with respect to joining of services of an employee of Central Government with a central a...
Mohd.SalauddIn Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :24.9.2013 Judgment delivered on :30.9.2013 CRL.A. 1366/2010 MOHD SALAUDDIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Adv. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellant is aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 30.9.2010 vide which he has been convicted under Sections 376 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for having committed rape upon his daughter and having criminally intimidated her during this period. Vide order of sentence dated 07.10.2010 the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.30,000/for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC; in default on payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. For the offence punishable under Section 506 IPC he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imp...
R.P. Khosla and anr. Vs. Hon.Ble Company Law Boardandors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6002/2013 and C.M.Nos.13222-25/2013 Reserved on :24. h September, 2013 Date of decision :30th September, 2013 % R.P. KHOSLA & ANR. Through : ..... Petitioners Petitioner no.2 in person. versus HON'BLE COMPANY LAW BOARD&ORS ..Respondents Through : None. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT J.R. Midha, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 16 th September, 2013 passed by the Company Law Board in Company Petition No.110(ND)13.2. Respondents No.5 to 7 filed the Company Petition No.110(ND)13 which was listed for hearing before the Company Law Board on 12th September, 2013 at 2.30 PM. The petitioners are not parties in that petition.3. The petitioners, who had filed a caveat and applications for impleadment/intervention before the Company Law Board on 9th September, 2013, mentioned the matter before the Member (Judicial) of Company Law Board on 12th September, 2013 at 10.30 AM when it was observed that the caveators...
Kamal Gaind Vs. the State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (CRL) 1379/2013 Date of Decision:30. h September, 2013 KAMAL GAIND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Magon, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate along with SI Girish Chandra, EOW, Crime Branch. AND + W.P.(CRL) 1502/2013 RAMPHAL BANSAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate along with SI Girish Chandra, EOW, Crime Branch. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Vide this common order. I shall dispose of two writ petitions bearing W.P. (Crl) Nos. 1379 of 2013 and 1502 of 2013, inasmuch as, both these petitions have been filed under Articles 21, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure,...
Pranay Sinha Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5319/2011 Date of Decision:30. h September, 2013 PRANAY SINHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.S.K.Pandey and Mr.Anshumaan Sahni, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.A.K.Behura, Adv. with Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocates for Pvt.Respondents. Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER % 30.09.2013 GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition raises a challenge to a judgment dated 30th September, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.NO.567/2009 and order dated 4th July, 2011 in R.A.No.95/2011 titled as M.K.Sharma & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. The original application was filed before the Tribunal by the promotees in the cadre of deputy directors with the EmployeesState Insurance Corporation (ESI) seeking a direction to the Director General, ESI to draw a correct seniority list on th...
Shyam Sunder @ Pappu Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~R-4 & R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.31/2005 % Judgment dated 30.09.2013 SHYAM SUNDER @ PAPPU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sudarshan Rajan, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 216/2005 SURAJ @ RAJBIR Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 22.11.2004 and order on sentence dated 24.11.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in S.C.No.24/2003. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. By the impugned judgment, the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years, each, for the offence punishable under Section 394/34 IPC with fine of Rs.5,000/-, each, and in default of payment of fine, five months rigorous imprisonment. The appellants were ...
Suraj @ Rajbir Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~R-4 & R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.31/2005 % Judgment dated 30.09.2013 SHYAM SUNDER @ PAPPU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sudarshan Rajan, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CRL.A. 216/2005 SURAJ @ RAJBIR Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 22.11.2004 and order on sentence dated 24.11.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in S.C.No.24/2003. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. By the impugned judgment, the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years, each, for the offence punishable under Section 394/34 IPC with fine of Rs.5,000/-, each, and in default of payment of fine, five months rigorous imprisonment. The appellants were ...
Marykutty George and ors. Vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :27. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 1644/2011 JINCY JOY AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. for IGNOU. Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. for Indian Nursing Council. Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advs. for Delhi Nursing Council. + W.P.(C) 3036/2012 K. BHARTI SHAKTISAGAR KATRE & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. for IGNOU. Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. for Indian Nursing Council. Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advs. for Delhi Nursing Council. + W.P.(C) 361/2012 MARYKUTTY GEORGE & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPE...
K. Bharti Shaktisagar Katre and ors. Vs. Indian Nursing Council and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :27. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 1644/2011 JINCY JOY AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. for IGNOU. Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. for Indian Nursing Council. Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advs. for Delhi Nursing Council. + W.P.(C) 3036/2012 K. BHARTI SHAKTISAGAR KATRE & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIAN NURSING COUNCIL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Aly Mirza, Adv. for IGNOU. Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Adv. for Indian Nursing Council. Mr. Sunil Kumar & Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advs. for Delhi Nursing Council. + W.P.(C) 361/2012 MARYKUTTY GEORGE & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Wills Mathews, Mr. Ginesh P. & Mr. Robin Raju, Advs. versus INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPE...
Mahesh Kumar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. No.1268/2013, BAIL APPLN. No.1273/2013, BAIL APPLN. No.1274/2013 & BAIL APPLN.No.1255/2013 Reserved on: Date of decision:04. 09.2013 27.09.2013 IN THE MATTERS OF: + BAIL APPLN. 1268/2013 MAHESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravi Nayak, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. P.P.for CBI with Ms. Nidhi Sharma and Ms. Monica Gupta, Advocates. AND + BAIL APPLN. 1273/2013 N. R. MANJUNATH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Makkar and Mr. Manu T. Ramachandran, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH C B I ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Standing Counsel, CBI AND + BAIL APPLN. 1274/2013 SANDEEP GOYAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Narang, Mr. Gaurang Kanth and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Standing Coun...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »