Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abhishek Tewari Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 3885/2013 ANAND TEWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Through: + W.P.(C) 5153/2013 P.K. TEWARI Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advs. for UOI ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. ..... Respondent Ms. Shipra Shukla, Adv. for R1&2 W.P.(C) 5155/2013 ABHISHEK TEWARI Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Shipra Shukla, Adv. for R1&2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner in W.P(C) No.3885/2013 holds a passport bearing number Z2038840 which came to be seized by the CBI in connection with a criminal case registered vide RC not BD1/2012/E/0001-BS&FC. Vide show cause notice dated 14.3.2012, the Regional Passport Officer (RPO) called upon the petitioner to show cause as to why his passpor...
Prem Prakash @ Tyagi @ Prem Prakash Upadhyay Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10th September, 2013 DECIDED ON :18. h September, 2013 + CRL.A. 190/2002 PREM PRAKASH @ TYAGI @ PREM PRAKASH UPADHYAY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP. AND + CRL.A. 266/2002 RENU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Dilshad, Mukesh @ Chhotu, Prem Prakash @ Tyagi @ Prem Prakash Upadhyay (A-1) and Devender were arrested in case FIR No.18/1992 under Section 399/402 IPC registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar on 16.01.1992. FIR Nos.19/1992, 20/1992 and 21/1992 were also registered under Section 25 Arms Act. Pursuant to disclosure statements recorded, their involvement surfaced in FIR No.444/1991 registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar and they were arrested in this case. The said FIR was lodged on 20.12.1991 under Section ...
Kashmiri Lal Vohra Vs. Ndpl
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
6,7, 10, 15 & 16 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5339/2010 NARESH CHAND SINGHAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 7. + W.P.(C) 8533/2009 JAGDEEP SINGH TALWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 10. + W.P.(C) 13630/2009 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 15. + W.P.(C) 799/2011 NEM CHAND AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. And 16. + W.P.(C) 905/2011 KASHMIRI LAL VOHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. Date of Decision:18. h September, 2013. % CORAM: HON'B...
Nem Chand Aggarwal Vs. Ndpl
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
6,7, 10, 15 & 16 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5339/2010 NARESH CHAND SINGHAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 7. + W.P.(C) 8533/2009 JAGDEEP SINGH TALWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 10. + W.P.(C) 13630/2009 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 15. + W.P.(C) 799/2011 NEM CHAND AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. And 16. + W.P.(C) 905/2011 KASHMIRI LAL VOHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. Date of Decision:18. h September, 2013. % CORAM: HON'B...
Dinesh Sud Vs. M/S. Stitchwell Qualitex Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10th September, 2013 Date of Decision:18. h September, 2013 % + CO.A(SB) 69/2011 DINESH SUD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. H. L. Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Goyal, Mr. Shubhankar Sengupta, Mr. Shailabh Tiwari, Mr. Bikash Mohanty and Ms. Ritu Chabbra, Advocates. versus M/S. STITCHWELL QUALITEX PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anish Dayal with Mr. Siddharth Vaid, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the order impugned being that of the Company Law Board passed on 04.07.2011 in Co. Pet. No.10/111/2009, in an application filed by the appellant herein under section 111(4) of the Act for rectification of the register of members.2. M/s. Stitchwell Qualitex Pvt. Ltd., the first respondent herein, is a company incorporated on 23.07.1980. Its initial shareholders were members of the family of S.N. Sud S.N. Sud himself, his s...
Harjinder Singh @ Jinda Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON + :18. h September, 2013. CRL.A. 911/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.974/2013 HARJINDER SINGH @ JINDA ....Appellant Through : Mr.Yogesh Kumar Saxena and Mr.Sikander Azam Khan, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant-Harjinder Singh @ Jinda challenges correctness of the judgment dated 26.04.2011 in Sessions Case No.105/2006 arising out of FIR No.43/2003 PS Sarai Rohilla Railway Station by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 29/21 (c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as NDPS Act). Vide an order dated 12.05.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for 20 years with fine ` 2 lacs for each offence.2. Raj Kumar Mehta, Pradeep Kumar Chawla @ Chhottu, Harjinder Singh @ Jinda (the appellant herein), Inder Singh, Mohd.Hanif and Harley were charge-sheeted under Sections 21/23/24/29 ...
Micro Super Cables Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
$~5, 6 & 7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CEAC 37 2012 Date of decision:18. h September, 2013 MICRO SUPER CABLES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shikha Sapra Yariagadda & Mr. Sanjeev Jaiswal, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sonia Sharma. Sr. Standing Counsel. CEAC 38 2012 MICRO SUPER CABLES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shikha Sapra Yariagadda & Mr. Sanjeev Jaiswal, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sonia Sharma. Sr. Standing Counsel. CEAC 39 2012 BOMBAY METAL INDUSTRIES ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shikha Sapra Yariagadda & Mr. Sanjeev Jaiswal, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sonia Sharma. Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): On 11th September, 2013, the following common substantial question of law was framed in these three appeals:Whether th...
M/S. Raj Cylinder and Containers Pvt. Ltd Vs. M/S.Hindustan General In ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 5/1999 M/S. RAJ CYLINDER AND CONTAINERS PVT. LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advocate. Versus M/S.HINDUSTAN GENERAL INDUSTRIES AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Saeed Hussain and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates. % Date of Decision : September 18, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Appellant seeks to assail the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated August 21, 1998 dismissing the suit of the Appellant.2. The facts relevant for the decision of the Appeal may be delineated as follows. The Appellant, M/s. Raj Cylinder and Containers Pvt. Ltd. and the Respondent No.1 (i.e. M/s. Hindustan General Industries Ltd.) entered into a contract whereunder the Respondent No.1 was to supply to the Appellant machinery including a 300 tonne deep drawing press. The Respondent No.1 had written a letter not UKM/1315 dated 26th Octob...
Ashok Kriplani Vs. Dr.Jethanand Jethwani and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :18. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A.955/2012 & CRL.M.A. 14166/2012 ASHOK KRIPLANI Through : ..... Appellant Appellant in person. versus DR.JETHANAND JETHWANI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) CRL.M.A. 14166/2012 (delay) Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of. CRL.A.955/2012 1. The appellant (Ashok Kriplani, Advocate) has preferred the appeal to challenge an order dated 04.02.2012 by which application under Section 340/190 Cr.P.C. against the respondents was dismissed. I have heard the appellant (in person) and Mr.M.N.Dudeja, Advocate/ amicus curiae.2. The appellant seeks enquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. as respondent No.1 (Dr.Jethanand Jethwani) has taken a false plea that there was a family settlement among the parties and it was acted upon...
Renu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10. h September, 2013 DECIDED ON :18. h September, 2013 + CRL.A. 266/2002 RENU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.190/2002 tilted Prem Prakash @ Tyagi @ Prem Prakash Upadhyay vs.State of Delhi. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE September 18, 2013 sa...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »