Skip to content

Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 18 2013

Geeta Batra Vs. State and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:18. h September, 2013 CS(OS) 2154/2007 MR. AJAY BATRA Through: + ..... Plaintiff Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sacchin Puri, Ms. Kaadambari, Ms. Namitha Mathews, Mr. Anuj Malhotra and Ms. Monica Chugh, Advs. Versus MR. Y.P. BATRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Vikas Kumar & Mr. Zarkab Anwar, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Rishabh Maheshwari & Ms. Samreen, Advs. for D-3 & 4. AND CS(OS) 571/2008 MS. AMBALIKA BATRA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate. Versus SH. AJAY BATRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sacchin Puri, Ms. Kaadambari, Ms. Namitha Mathews, Mr. Anuj Malhotra & Ms. Monica Chugh, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Vikas Kumar & Mr. Zarkab Anwar, Advs. for D-3. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Rishabh Maheshwari & Ms. Samreen, Advs. for D-4 & 5. AND + TEST.CAS. 9/2009 GEETA BATRA Through: ..... Pe...


Sep 18 2013

Sunita Vs. Ranbir Singh and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h September, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1411/2010 SUNITA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. R.K. Saini and Ms. Minal Sehgal, Advocates. Versus RANBIR SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Madan Lal Sharma and Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocates for D - 1, 3(a) & 3(b). CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.I.A. No.15375/2010 (of D-1, 3(a) & 3(b) u/O 7 R-11 CPC).1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit for partition of, (i) industrial plot bearing Khasra No.143/217 (0-06); (ii) residential plot bearing Khasra No.142/274 (2-02); (iii) agricultural land bearing Khasras No.88/22 (4-16), 92/2 (3-06); and, (iv) residential built up house in old abadi area bearing municipal No.317, measuring 300 sq. yds., all situated in the revenue estate of Village-Kanjhawala, Delhi, pleading:(a). that Shri Sher Singh father of the plaintiff and the defendants no.1,2&4 to 6 and grandfather of the defendants no.3(a) & 3 (b) was the...


Sep 18 2013

Ved Kumar Vs. Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication E

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on September 02, 2013 Judgment Delivered on September 18, 2013 + LPA 637/2013 VED KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Yashvardhan, Adv. versus INSTITUTIOIN OF ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERS & OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.N.L.Bareja, Adv. for R-1 Ms.Raavi Birbal, Adv. for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated May 22, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (C) No. 7647 of 2002 whereby the award passed by the Labour Court No. III, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, for reinstatement of the appellant was set aside and it was declared that he shall be entitled to 75% back wages along with compensation in `4,00,000/- (Four Lacs only).2. The appellant was appointed as a clerk on temporary basis against a regular vacancy by the respondent No. 1 in...


Sep 18 2013

Chemons India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vijay Singh Sandhu

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h September, 2013 % + RFA No.26/2013, CM No.687/2013 (for stay), CM No.2467/2013 (u/S 15.CPC) & CM No.3832/2013 (for cross-objection). CHEMONS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.N. Goburdhon and Mr. Aayush Chandra, Advs. Versus VIJAY SINGH SANDHU Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Amrit Kaur Oberai with Ms. Neha Mishra & Ms. Jessica Gill, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 9 th October, 2012 of the Court of Addl. District Judge-06 (West District), Tis Hazari Courts in Civil Suit No.312/2012 filed by the respondent/plaintiff) (i) of ejectment of the appellant/defendant from the entire first floor of building No.1, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi; (ii) recovery from the appellant/defendant of arrears of rent amounting to Rs.2,12,850/- for the period from 1 st August, 1994 to 30th June, 1995 along with simple interest at 15% per...


Sep 18 2013

DIn Bandhu Dass Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 3470/2013; CM No.6571/2013 (Stay) & 11101/2013 (for vacation of stay) DIN BANDHU DASS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.G. Sharma & Mr. Arav Kapoor, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. L.K. Passi, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anjali Chauhan & Ms. Suvavna Kashyap, Advs. for AIIMS. Ms. Kusum Sanghi, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Vide Memorandum dated 13.12.2010 the petitioner, Din Bandhu Dass, was selected to run Cafe-5 at Gents Hostel of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (for short AIIMS) on contract basis for a period of eleven (11) months commencing 1.1.2011, subject to the terms & conditions stipulated in the said Memorandum. Vide Memorandum dated 25.4.2013, the petitioner was informed that his contract had been extended for a period of one (1) month, i.e. w.e.f. 1.5...


Sep 18 2013

Ms. Ambalika Batra and ors Vs. Sh. Ajay Batra and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:18. h September, 2013 CS(OS) 2154/2007 MR. AJAY BATRA Through: + ..... Plaintiff Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sacchin Puri, Ms. Kaadambari, Ms. Namitha Mathews, Mr. Anuj Malhotra and Ms. Monica Chugh, Advs. Versus MR. Y.P. BATRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Vikas Kumar & Mr. Zarkab Anwar, Advs. for D-2. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Rishabh Maheshwari & Ms. Samreen, Advs. for D-3 & 4. AND CS(OS) 571/2008 MS. AMBALIKA BATRA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate. Versus SH. AJAY BATRA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sacchin Puri, Ms. Kaadambari, Ms. Namitha Mathews, Mr. Anuj Malhotra & Ms. Monica Chugh, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Arvind Nayar, Mr. Vikas Kumar & Mr. Zarkab Anwar, Advs. for D-3. Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Rishabh Maheshwari & Ms. Samreen, Advs. for D-4 & 5. AND + TEST.CAS. 9/2009 GEETA BATRA Through: ..... Pe...


Sep 18 2013

Raj Kumar Mehta Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON + :18. h September, 2013. CRL.A. 895/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.852/2013 RAJ KUMAR MEHTA ....Appellant Through : Mr.S.S.Das, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : .Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant-Raj Kumar Mehta challenges correctness of the judgment dated 26.04.2011 in Sessions Case No.105/2006 arising out of FIR No.43/2003 PS Sarai Rohilla Railway Station by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as NDPS Act). Vide an order dated 12.05.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for 20 years with fine ` 2 lacs for the said offence.2. Raj Kumar Mehta (the appellant herein), Pradeep Kumar Chawla @ Chhottu, Harjinder Singh @ Jinda, Inder Singh, Mohd.Hanif and Harley were charge-sheeted under Sections 21/23/24/29 of NDPS Act on the allegations that on or before 20.09.20...


Sep 18 2013

Jagdeep Singh Talwar Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

6,7, 10, 15 & 16 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5339/2010 NARESH CHAND SINGHAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 7. + W.P.(C) 8533/2009 JAGDEEP SINGH TALWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 10. + W.P.(C) 13630/2009 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI POWER LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. With 15. + W.P.(C) 799/2011 NEM CHAND AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. And 16. + W.P.(C) 905/2011 KASHMIRI LAL VOHRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. versus NDPL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate. Date of Decision:18. h September, 2013. % CORAM: HON'B...


Sep 18 2013

P.K. Tewari Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 3885/2013 ANAND TEWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Through: + W.P.(C) 5153/2013 P.K. TEWARI Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Saqib, Mr. Akshay Chandra, Advs. for UOI ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. ..... Respondent Ms. Shipra Shukla, Adv. for R1&2 W.P.(C) 5155/2013 ABHISHEK TEWARI Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Madhav Khurana, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Shipra Shukla, Adv. for R1&2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner in W.P(C) No.3885/2013 holds a passport bearing number Z2038840 which came to be seized by the CBI in connection with a criminal case registered vide RC not BD1/2012/E/0001-BS&FC. Vide show cause notice dated 14.3.2012, the Regional Passport Officer (RPO) called upon the petitioner to show cause as to why his passpor...


Sep 18 2013

Ravi Gupta and Another Vs. M/S Unitech Ltd and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

A-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on: + 12.08.2013 18.09.2013 IA No.18828/2011 in CS(OS) 1795/2011 RAVI GUPTA & ANOTHER ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr D.K. Thakur and Mr.R.S. Chauhan, Advocate versus M/S UNITECH LTD & OTHERS .... Defendants Through Mr. Sunil Goel, Mr. Susheel Bhartiya and Mr.Pranav Sapra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.18828/2011 (u/S 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ) 1. This is an application filed by the defendant under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the matter to Arbitration. The present application has been filed by the defendant stating that the plaintiff has entered into an agreement with the defendants for purchase/allotment of a commercial unit in the complex known as Unitech Commercial Centre in Gurgaon, Haryana. It is stated that the Agreement (akin to agreement to sell) is contained in the Application Form coupled with the general terms...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial