Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pushpa JaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$~R-1 & 2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated 23rd September, 2013 % + CRL.A. 4/2005 PUSHPA JAIN Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M. Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Through : Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Adv. ..... Appellant Mr.M. Shamikh, Adv. CRL.A. 23/2005 PANKAJ JAIN versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Both the present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 13.12.2004 and order on sentence dated 14.12.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in S.C.No.108/2002. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. By the impugned judgment, Smt.Pushpa Jain, mother-in-law, (appellant in Crl.Appeal No.4/2005) has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years for the offence punishable under Sections 498A IPC with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonmen...
Tilak Raj Mullick Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4886/1994 23rd September, 2013 % TILAK RAJ MULLICK Through: ......Petitioner Mr. M.Dutta, Advocate. VERSUS STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition the petitioner-Sh. Tilak Raj Mullick seeks the relief that the respondent no.1/State Bank of India should take him back in service without any break in service and with consequential entitlement to pensionary benefits. Petitioner has also prayed for quashing of the actions of the respondent-bank in treating the petitioner as having vacated the job voluntarily and which is so stated by the respondent-bank in its letter dated 19.4.1985. Petitioner during the hearing has confined the relief claimed to the grant of pensionary benefits inasmuch as the petitioner has crossed the age of superannuat...
Ex. Constable Chander Mohan Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.85/2012 Decided on :23. d September, 2013 EX. CONSTABLE CHANDER MOHAN Through: Appellant Mr.R.S.Nagpal and Mr.Harpreet S.Nagpal, Advocates. Versus Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr.R.Mishra and Mr.Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment/order dated 22.03.3012 passed by learned ADJ, Central-08, Delhi, in RCA No.77/11. The learned ADJ set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2011 passed by the learned trial court whereby the learned trial court had decreed the suit filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant with regard to the formulation of the substantial question of law. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the two substantial questions of law are arising from the present appeal.3. Firstly, it has been contended that the re...
Sahil Kohli Vs. Additional Commissioner of Police
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:20. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5959 of 2013 SAHIL KOHLI Through: ..... Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel, GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No.13137/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP (C) No.5959/2013 The petitioner before this Court, who is a Doctor by profession, applied for grant of a fire arm licence for his personal safety. The said application was rejected vide order 26.12.2012, of the Licensing Authority without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Being aggrieved from the rejection of his application, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Lieutenant Governot of Delhi. After hearing the petitioner through his counsel, the appeal was dismissed on the ground that there was no specific threat to the petitioners life or property, which would j...
Preet Pal Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :20. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 810/2002 PREET PAL SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. VERSUS STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Preet Pal Singh (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 29.08.2002 in Sessions Case No.42/2001 arising out of FIR No.453/2000 under Sections 498A/306 IPC PS Ambedkar Nagar by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 306 IPC. By an order dated 01.10.2002, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 500/-.2. Allegations against the appellant Preet Pal Singh were that he used to treat Pinky (his wife) with cruelty during her stay at House not C-11, Raju Park, Debli. On 26.11.2000, he abetted Pinky to commit suicide by uttering words marke dikha. Pinky poured kerosene oil on her body and put herself on fire. Preet Pal Singh did not take her ...
Salim @ Naju Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t July, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h September, 2013 + CRL.A.976/2012 SALIM @ NAJU Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor CRL.A.802/2013 RAJ KUMAR @ KHUJJAR Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These two appeals arise out of judgment dated 27.02.2012 and order on sentence dated 14.03.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.206/2009 whereby the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code(IPC) and under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of `5,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IP...
Raj Kumar @ Khujjar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. t July, 2013 Pronounced on:20. h September, 2013 + CRL.A.976/2012 SALIM @ NAJU Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor CRL.A.802/2013 RAJ KUMAR @ KHUJJAR Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These two appeals arise out of judgment dated 27.02.2012 and order on sentence dated 14.03.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.206/2009 whereby the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code(IPC) and under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of `5,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IP...
K.K. Mehta and anr. Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
R-21 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4140/2001 K.K. MEHTA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Dr.N. Pradeep Sharma with Ms. Nasreen, Advocates. versus DELHI VIDYUT BOARD AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kr. Srivastava, Advocate Date of Decision:20. h September, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pay to the petitioners Rs.36,22,000/- on account of thirty per cent burn injuries sustained by petitioner No.2-Mr. Saurabh Mehta.2. In the petition, it is alleged that on 30th September, 2000, there was a huge blast in the respondents sub-station adjoining the park of Shivam Enclave, Delhi in which petitioner No.2 aged about ten years suffered burn injuries and electric shock in his belly, chest, right shoulder and on the back of his body. It is the petitioners case that the respondents were negligent in keeping the gates of an unmanned sub-st...
Vinod Kumar @ Shahid Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :20. h SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 489/2012 & CRL.M.A. 14175/2013 VInot KUMAR @ SHAHID Through : ..... Appellant Mr.S.S.Ahluwalia, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Vinot Kumar @ Shahid (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 18.11.2011 in Sessions Case No.20/2010 arising out of FIR No.12/10 PS SRRS by which he was held guilty for committing ofences punishable under Section 489B/489C IPC. By an order dated 22.11.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 10,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 29.03.2010 at around 03.30 P.M., information was received that an individual Vinot along with his accomplice would come at around 07.00 P.M. to sell Indian counterfeit currency notes to passengers of Gorak Dham Express at Shakur Basti. A raiding party was organized and at abo...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Anil Kumar Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. h September, 2013 MAC.APP. 576/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. versus ANIL KUMAR SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Jha, Adv. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 18.02.2012, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation of Rs.8,62,448/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition, i.e., 02.11.2010 till notice under Order 21 Rule 1 CPC given by the Insurance Company.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that the claimants have claimed that deceased was employed with M/s. Verma Enterprise, C-5, Wazirpur Industrial Area, Delhi as a mechanic and was earning Rs.46,00/- per month.3. Ld. Counsel submitted that despite this fact, ld. Tribunal has considered the monthly income of the deceased ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »