Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manju Kadam Vs. Surender Kadam and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: August 30, 2013 Pronounced on: September 23, 2013 + CRL.REV.P. 406/2003 MANJU KADAM Through: .... Petitioner Mr. C.Mohan Rao, Mr. Deepak Khadaria and Ms. Sangeeta Chandra, Advocates with petitioner in person versus SURENDER KADAM & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.M. Bari, Advocate with respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR No.250/1995 under Sections 406/498A of IPC registered at P.S. Prasad Nagar, Delhi. She is aggrieved by trial court's judgment of 29 th January, 2003 vide which respondent-accused has been acquitted.2. Challenge to the impugned judgment by learned counsel for petitioner is on the ground that the findings returned in the impugned judgment are contrary to the evidence on record. During the course of the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner had drawn the attention of this Court to the deposition of petitioner herein, w...
Manish Chawla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1348/2013 % Date of Decision: September 23, 2013 MANISH CHAWLA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Ms. Subhadra Shukla, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State. SI Shailendra, AFS/EOW. Mr. Azhar Alam, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. This is an application u/s 440 read with section 439(1)(b) and 482 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner to set aside the order dated 28th June, 2013 passed by the ld.ASJ, Delhi wherein prayer is made to remove the condition of deposit of alleged cheated amount in bail order dated 20th June, 2013 passed by the ld.Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in FIR No.56/2012 registered u/s 420/406/467/468/471/120B IPC at PS EOW, Delhi. Further prayer is made for reducing the bail bond amount to ` 20,000/- from the sum of Rs.1 lakh.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested in some other case ...
Premendra Raj Mehta and ors Vs. National Building Construction Corp. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :13. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :23. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 2106/2012 PREMENDRA RAJ MEHTA AND ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. versus NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORP. LTD & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr Tanmay Mehta, Adv for R-1 Mr Amrit Pal Singh, Adv for R-3 Mr Sanjay Abbot, Adv for R-4 Mr Maveen R. Nath and Ms Amita Sharma, Advs for Council of Architecture CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Section 37(1) of the Architects Act, 1972 reads as under:37. Prohibition against use of title. (1) After the expiry of one year from the date appointed under sub- section (2) of section 24, no person other than a registered architect, or a firm of architects shall use the title and style of architect: Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply to(a) practice of the profession of an architect by a person designated as a" landscape architect" or" naval architect"; (b) a pers...
University of Delhi Vs. Dr Rajiv Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:16. 09.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:23. 09.2013 % LPA 450/2013, CM APPL.9830, 9831/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. versus DR RAJIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr. S.S. Nehra, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Singh and Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT For detailed judgment, the decision dated 23.09.2013 in LPA 358/2013 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 23 2013 /vks/...
Sunil Kumar Vs. the State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :23. d SEPTEMBER, 2013 + CRL.A. 513/2003 SUNIL KUMAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sunil Mehta, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Sunil Kumar (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 08.05.2003 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.68/02 arising out of FIR No.673/2000 PS Tilak Nagar by which he was convicted under Section 395/34 IPC. By an order dated 13.05.2003, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 395/34 IPC.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on the night intervening 2/3.08.2000 at about 01.45 A.M., an information was received at PS Tilak Nagar that some assailants were breaking open the locks of shop No.104, M/s.Harkishan Jewellers in NA-Block, near Vishnu Garden Temple/ Gurudwara. Daily Diary (DD) No.79-B was recorded and the inv...
Shivaji College and ors Vs. Rajiv Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:16. 09.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:23. 09.2013 % LPA 358/2013 & CM No.8408/2013 SHIVAJI COLLEGE & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. Versus RAJIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr. S.S. Nehra, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Singh and Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocates. LPA 450/2013, CM APPL.9830, 9831/2013 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate. versus DR RAJIV KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr. S.s. Nehra, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Singh and Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocates. LPA 35.& 450/2013 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The Shivaji College (hereaft...
Satender Kumar Chandana Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23rd September, 2013 + CM(M) 23/2010 SATENDER KUMAR CHANDANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking setting aside of the order dated 20.08.2009, whereby an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 moved by the petitioner for setting aside the recovery rights granted vide award dated 14.02.2007, was dismissed by the learned Tribunal.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that on the relevant date, the driver of the offending vehicle was having a valid driving licence; however, he could not produce the same during the trial. After the award having been passed by the learned Tribunal, the petitioner got the driving lic...
Sushila Rani and ors. Vs. Dhan Kishore and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: September 23, 2013 FAO No.392/2012, C.M. Nos.15847/2012 & 19781/2012 SUSHILA RANI AND ORS Through ..... Appellants Ms.Sonia Arora, Adv. with Mr.Surjeet Kr.Singh, Adv. versus DHAN KISHORE & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Pradeep Mahajan, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Ms.Sushma Jain, Adv. for R-3. Mr.Ramendra Singh, Adv. for R-4 to R-7. AND + FAO No.394/2012, C.M. Nos.15861/2012 & 19783/2012 SUSHILA RANI AND ORS Through ..... Appellants Ms.Sonia Arora, Adv. with Mr.Surjeet Kr.Singh, Adv. versus DHAN KISHORE & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr.Pradeep Mahajan, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Ms.Sushma Jain, Adv. for R-3. Mr.Ramendra Singh, Adv. for R-4 to R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned two appeals have been filed by the appellants under Sections 299 and 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 assailing the orders dated 28th August 2012 passed by learned Addl. District Judge (Central), T...
Mahender Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1180/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1400/2012 Reserved on:7. h May, 2013 Decided on:23. d September , 2013 % MAHENDER Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Meena Chaudhary Sharma, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Gopeshwar Nath Tiwari, PS Sarai Rohilla. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellant impugns the judgment dated 2nd July, 2010 whereby he has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 3rd July, 2010 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the FIR was an afterthought doctored version lodged at the instance of the mother of the prosecutrix to grab the property of the Appellant. Material witness i.e. Raj was not examined. The statements of the defence witne...
Rahul Kumar Sachan Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:23. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 5410 of 2013 RAHUL KUMAR SACHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dinesh Singh Chaudhary, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. Rakesh Gosain, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court obtained a degree in Medicine from Daghestan State Medical Academy on 18.6.2009. The petitioner appeared in the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination, commonly known as Screening Test conducted by respondent No.2/National Board of Examinations in September, 2009 but could not clear the said examination. Thereafter the petitioner appeared in the Screening Tesh held in March, 2010, September, 2010, March, 2011, September, 2011 and then September, 2012. However, he could not clear any of the said examinations. The petitioner applied for appearing in the Screening Test conducted in March, 2012 but could not appear, being sick at that tim...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »