Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar Nagpal and ors Vs. M/S Silver Grand Services and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :05. 09.2013 Pronounced on:30. 09.2013 + IA Nos. 16249/2012(u/S 151 CPC) and 16250/2012 (for condonation of delay in re-filing application no.16249/12) in CS(OS) 2400/2011 RAJESH KUMAR NAGPAL & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Rajshekhar Rao and Mr.K.Harshvardhan Reddy, Advocates versus M/S SILVER GRAND SERVICES & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Madan Gera, Advocate alongwith Mr.Parminder Singh/defendant no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.16249/2012 (u/S 151 CPC) and 16250/2012 (for condonation of delay in re-filing application no.16249/12) 1. This is an application filed by the defendants for modification of order dated 24.11.2011 and 22.12.2011 and for further direction that rent and conversion charges to be paid to the plaintiff be suspended till the applicants/defendants get license from the statutory authority.2. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration, permanent injunc...
Vijay Goel Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Developm
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:30. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 6225 of 2013 & CM Nos.13633-34/2013 VIJAY GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Goel, Adv. versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Renuka Arora, Adv. for DSIDC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner who was carrying business in the name of M/s A.V. Upper Udyog, applied for allotment of an alternative industrial plot under the scheme framed by the respondents for Relocation of Industries being run in non-confirming areas. Some of the applicants under the aforesaid scheme were allotted plots in Phase-I of Bawana Industrial Area. Since no such allotment was made to the petitioner and his claim was rejected, he filed W.P(C) No.4114/2007 before this Court. Vide order dated 19.11.2011, this Court directed reconsideration of the case of the petitioner followed by a speaking order by the Commissio...
Umesh Kumar Baveja and ors. Vs. Ilandfs Transportation Network Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:4th September, 2013 Date of Decision:30. h September, 2013 % + CO.A(SB) 30/2013 & Co.Appl.1051/2013 UMESH KUMAR BAVEJA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr Angad Singh Dugal and Mr Akhil Anand, Advs. versus IL&FS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Ms Niti Dixit, Mr Vidur Bhatia and Ms. Shivani Surghal, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Act) impugning the orders dated 10.04.2013 and 10.05.2013 passed by the Company Law Board in Company Petition No.133(ND)/2012. The appellants are: Umesh Kumar Baveja (A-1), Regional Airport Holdings International Ltd. (A-2) and RAHI Aviation Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (A-3). The respondents in the appeal are IL&FS Transportation Network Ltd. (R-1), Gulbarga Airport Developers Pvt. L...
C.Vijaya Kumar and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 05, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 30, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C. No.3038/1999 C. VIJAYA KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan Arya, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr.Ravi Nayak Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1-State Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. No.102/2000 OM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: In person versus STATE & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr.Ravi Nayak Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1-State Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT In the above captioned first petition, petitioners are the Deputy General Manager (P&A) and the Manager of Badarpur Thermal Power Station, who are accused of misappropriating the contribution of canteen employees of Badarpur Thermal Power Station (hereinafter referred to as B.T.P.S.) towards Provident Fund.2. Aforesaid petitioners...
Bhawana Kumari Mallick and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 6278 of 2013 & CM Nos.13725-26/2013 BHAWANA KUMARI MALLICK & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Ekta K. Sikri, Mr. Sudeep Dey and Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC, Mr. Ravjyot Singh with Mr. Alok Dixit, Section Officer for R-1 and 5 Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R-3University of Delhi Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. for MCI . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court are the citizens of Nepal, who qualified COMPEX-NEPAL, 2013 EXAMINATION conducted for selection of Nepalese students for admission in Indian Educational Institutions and who have been nominated by respondent no.1 Union of India, for admission to MBBS course of Lady Harding Medical College (LHMC) of Delhi University, against Nominees of Government of India (NGOI) Quota. A communication dated 18.9.201...
Rajinder Singh Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h September, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1172/2013 & CM.APPL.2212/2013 RAJINDER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini with Mr. Dushyant, Advocates Versus DDA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhana Takiar with Ms. Ritagya Riti, Advocates for the DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G.P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner was a successful bidder in respect of allotment of a residential plot No.69, Chowkandi, Delhi measuring 162 sq. mts. in an auction held on 21.08.2002. His bid of `12,97,000/- was accepted by the DDA. The earnest money of `3,24,250/-, representing 25% of the total bid amount, was deposited with the DDA on the date of the auction itself. The balance of `9,72,766/- was admittedly deposited by the Petitioner in November, 2002 according to the terms of the auction and the allotment of the plot was made to the Petitioner.2. As per the terms of the allotment, the Petitioner was required to submit f...
Maharaja AgarsaIn Educational Society and anr. Vs. Mithlesh Gupta and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2518/2012 & CM53922012 % 30.09.2013 MAHARAJA AGARSAIN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ANR. .... Petitioners Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Ms. Sonia Chopra, Advocates versus MITHLESH GUPTA AND ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Omar Siddiqui, Advocate for Ms. Farida Satarawala, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition impugns the judgment of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 16.3.2012. By the impugned judgment, Tribunal has held that respondent No.1 herein was illegally removed from her services with the petitioner-school. Two issues were framed by the Tribunal pertaining to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and also with respect to whether the resignation of the respondent No.1 was valid in terms of Rule 114-A of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. Tribunal has held that it had jurisdict...
National Investor Forum Vs. the Golden Forests (India ) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. 9.2013 Decided on :30. .9.2013 + W.P.(C) NO.1399/2010 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harpawan Kumar Arora with Mr.Prashant Chauhan and Mr.Saurabh Suman Sinha, Advocates for the Committee/GFIL Versus THE GOLDEN FORESTS (INDIA ) LTD. ..... Respondent Through : CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI CM No.9656/2013 1. The application has been filed by the Committee/GFIL, seeking the following reliefs:- WP(C) No.1399/2010 Page 1 (i) to make an offer to the bidder M/s SAS Properties, No.105, Sector-6, Panchkula, on the lines of the order dated 14.06.2013 (Annexure A-3) read with previous order dated 27.2.2013 (Annexure A-1); (ii) If this offer is acceptable to the bidder M/s. SAS Properties, aforesaid, the Honble High Court of Delhi is prayed that the order dated 11.8.2011 regarding confirmation of the sale may be modified accordingly. or If ...
Anand Parkash Batra Vs. Central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5698/1998 30th September, 2013 % ANAND PARKASH BATRA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Vinay Sabharwal and Ms. Neha Sabharwal, Advocates. VERSUS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: ...... Respondents Mr. R.S.Mathur, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The issue to be decided in the present writ petition is the claim of the petitioner to pensionary benefits in accordance with the 1995 Pension Scheme of the respondent-bank. Respondent denies entitlement of the petitioner to the 1995 Pension Scheme on the ground that the scheme will not apply as per para 22 of the 1995 Pension Scheme when a person has resigned from service as distinguished from having voluntary retired.2. Before this Court two judgments of the Supreme Court are cited. First is the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Sheel Kumar Jain Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors. (2011) 12...
Tahir HussaIn Vs. Regional Executive Director, Airports Authority of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2247/2010 & CM No.4539/2010 (Stay) 30th September, 2013 % TAHIR HUSSAIN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. D.K.Singh, Adv. VERSUS REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks the relief of being appointed to the post of Junior Assistant (Office) with the respondent. The relief clause itself states that petitioner be appointed only as per his ranking and merit.2. Petitioner appeared in the selection process for the post by appearing in the written test held on 28.10.2007 and in the typing test which was held on 16.3.2008. Interview was thereafter conducted of the petitioner on 15.7.2008. Petitioner claims that he is entitled to be appointed, however, it is not disputed that petitioners claim would be valid only if the petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »