Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Vimal Telektronix Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Tata Telecom Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.S(OS) No.952/2004 Date of Decision:23. 09.2013 M/S. VIMAL TELEKTRONIX PVT. LTD. Through: ......Plaintiffs Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. Versus M/S. TATA TELECOM LTD. Through: ......Defendants Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This is a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 31,44,080.00/- (Rupees Thirty One Lakhs, Forty Four Thousand and Eighty only) along with interest @ 15% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realisation. The case of the plaintiff is as follows.2. The plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in the business of supply and installation of G. I. Pipes, supply of prefabricated RCC, concrete makers etc. The plaintiff submits that the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter 'the IOCL'), gave the contract of laying Optical Fiber Cable (hereinafter 'OFC') to the defendant vide Contract No.PL/E&C/T&I/KS-SnM/TC dated December 17, 1999. The sai...
Puneet Kaushik and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :05. 09.2013 Judgment pronounced on :23. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 1631/2013 PUNEET KAUSHIK AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv with Mr Praveen Anand, Ms. Divya Vijan, Ms. Ayushi Kiran & Ms. Neeti Wilson, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rajnish K. Jha, Adv. & Dr. Kavita Taunk, Assistant Controller of Patents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court claim to have filed on 14.9.2012, in the Patents Office (India) at New Delhi, an international (PCT) application in terms of Rule 18.3 of the PCT Rules, enclosing therewith (i) Form-25 (in duplicate) on behalf of petitioner no.1 Puneet Kaushik (ii) Power of Attorney for Form-25 (copy) (iii) PCT Request along with Declaration of Inventorship (in duplicate) (iv) PCT Power of Attorney (v) complete specification along with drawings (in duplicate) (vi) PCT fee c...
Anjali Birla Sawhney and Antoher Vs. Tirathram Shah Charitable Trust a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IA Nos. 16634/2010 & 16958/2010 in CS(OS) 1291/2010 Reserved on:21. t August, 2013 Decided on:23. d September, 2013 % ANJALI BIRLA SAWHNEY & ANTOHER Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advs. versus TIRATHRAM SHAH CHARITABLE TRUST AND OTHERS ..... Defendant Through Mr. Ajay K. Tandon, Mr. Chandrashekhar, Advs. for D-1&4. Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Abhas Kr., Mr. Arush, Advs. for D-2&3. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA IA 16634/2010 (by D-1&4 u/O VII R 11 CPC) IA 16958/2010 (by D-2&3 u/O VII R 11 CPC) 1. By these two applications the defendants seek rejection of the plaint under order VII Rule 11 CPC, inter alia, on the grounds that the suit is barred by limitation, discloses no cause of action and that no leave of the Court has been sought under Section 92 CPC.2. Learned counsel for the applicants/ defendant Nos. 1&4 in IA 16634/2010 contends that in a dispute relating to the trust falling under Clau...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Hero Management Service Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
$~8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.439/2013 Date of decision:23. d September, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S HERO MANAGEMENT SERVICE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Satyen Sethi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue, which pertains to Assessment Year 2007-08, raises two issues. The first issue relates to disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the second issue relates to disallowance of provision for current liabilities of Rs.2,51,96,577/-.2. At the outset, we notice the casual and insouciant approach adopted by the Assessing Officer, who had made additions of Rs.6,75,64,435/-, to the returned income of Rs.85,970/- in an order dated 31st March 2007, which is bereft of contentions being noticed and rejected by a reasoned discussion.3. The Assess...
Union of India Vs. M/S Ravinder Kapoor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 09.2013 + O.M.P. 477/2013 UNION OF INDIA ..... PETITIONER versus M/S RAVINDER KAPOOR ..... RESPONDENT ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Mr. Gaurav Khanna, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. J.C. Seth, Advocate CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J IA No.7795/2013 (condonation of delay in filing the captioned petition) and IA No.7796/2013 (condonation of delay in re-filing the captioned petition) 1. The captioned applications have been filed by the applicant/petitioner. The first application being: IA No.7795/2013 is for condonation of delay in filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), while the second application being: IA No.7796/2013 is for condonation of delay in re-filing.2. In IA No.7795/2013 the petitioner avers that, the delay in initial filing of the petition is 14 days whereas, in the se...
Air Force Senior Secondary School Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 09.2013 Pronounced on:23. 09.2013 + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA 530/2013, C.M. APPL.11410/2013 & 11412/2013 LPA 531/2013, C.M. APPL.11414/2013 & 11416/2013 LPA 533/2013, C.M. APPL.11419/2013 & 11421/2013 LPA 534/2013, C.M. APPL.11426/2013 & 11428/2013 LPA 535/2013, C.M. APPL.11430/2013 & 11432/2013 LPA 536/2013, C.M. APPL.11437/2013 & 11439/2013 LPA 537/2013, C.M. APPL.11443/2013 & 11445/2013 LPA 538/2013, C.M. APPL.11449/2013 & 11451/2013 LPA 539/2013, C.M. APPL.11453/2013 & 11455/2013 LPA 540/2013, C.M. APPL.11457/2013 & 11459/2013 LPA 541/2013, C.M. APPL.11463/2013 & 11465/2013 LPA 542/2013, C.M. APPL.11467/2013 & 11469/2013 AIR FORCE SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Appellant Through : Sh. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Bhanita Patowary, Advocate. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Ramashankar with Sh. Shivam Garg, Smt. Kamlesh and Ms. Renu, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. (Item Nos. 21 to 33). Sh. M...
Shakti Gupta Vs. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REW. PET. 109/2013 in CM(M) 957/2012 Date of Decision:23. 09.2013 SHAKTI GUPTA ..Petitioner Through: Mr.Rishi Manchanda, Adv. Versus ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS. Through: ....Respondent Mr.Amit S.Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kunal Sinha, Adv. for R1 and R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This application is filed by the applicants/respondents No.1 and 2 seeking review of the order dated 27.09.2012.2. Respondents No.1 and 2 herein filed a suit being CS (OS) 252/2011 in the court of Additional District Judge-04, South District, Saket Courts against the petitioner herein i.e. Shakti Gupta (Defendant No.2) and respondent No.3 herein i.e. M/s. VXL Lodging N Boarding Services Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant No.1) seeking possession of the suit premises i.e. S-60, Ground Floor, Greater Kailash, Part II, New Delhi.3. In the said suit, the plaintiffs (respondents No.1 and 2 herein) filed an application under Order XVA Rule 1 CPC dated 29.02.2012, s...
Ex Sgt.R.S.Dwivedi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on September 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on September 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) No.1588/2013 EX SGT.R.S.DWIVEDI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.V.S.Tomar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Saahila Lamba and Ms.Richa Kapoor, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated February 08, 2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench in Original Application No.33/2013, whereby the Tribunal has rejected the claim of the petitioner for grant of pension and other benefits. Facts:2. The petitioner at the relevant point of time was posted at 334, TRU, C/o Airforce Station, Thane, where he was allotted the H.No.E-37, Station Married Quarter on October 17, 2007. From November 04,2007, he was sharing the said house with the family of Warrant Officer P.K.Panigrahy compris...
Mcd Vs. C.M. Vij and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 09.2013 Pronounced on:23. 09.2013 + W.P.(C) 2040/2012 MCD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate. versus C.M. VIJ AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Moni Cinmay and Sh. Saurav Suman, Advocates along with Sh. C.M. Viz in person. Sh. M.P. Singh, Advocate, for UOI. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This writ petition preferred by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed against a judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 11.11.2009 in T.A. No.1060/2009, and the subsequent judgment dismissing the review application (No.267/2011) dated 01.12.2011.2. The facts of this case are not in dispute between the parties. The Respondent, Sh. CM Vij held the post of Superintending Engineer W.P.(C)2040/2012 Page 1 (Civil) with effect from 08.08.1987 (though it became regularized only on 04.10.1996), and the post of the Chief Engine...
Morgan Securities and Credits P. Vs. State of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + (1) CRL.M.C.4603/2005 MORGAN SECURITIES & CREDITS P. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Saigal & Mr. Jitender Batta, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through: + (2) .....Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State Mr. R. N. Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Sugam Puri, Mr. Ankit Goel & Mr. Ashish Dhingra, Advocates CRL.M.C.5004/2005 & Crl.M.As. No.10022/05; 10025/07; 13116/07; 2094/08; 2299/10; 2300/10; 12884/10 & 2660/11 MORGAN SECURITIES & CREDITS P. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Saigal & Mr. Jitender Batta, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through: Crl.M.C.4603/2005 .....Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State Mr. R. N. Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »