Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Divya Bhalla Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:25. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 2606/2013 & CM Nos.11798/2013 & 13454/2013 DIVYA BHALLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court, after her graduation from Dayal Singh College appeared in entrance examination of Delhi University for admission to its M.A. (English) course in Non-Collegiate Womens Education Board Respondent no.2. The petitioner belongs to OBC category since she is a sumar and the said community was declared an OBC in Delhi vide Government of Delhi notification dated 20.1.1995. The learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the said community was also recognized as OBC by the Government of India and this fact can be verified by the university.2. Column number 6 of the application form for admission t...
Samar Chakravarty Vs. Director of Education, Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5366/2012 25th September, 2013 SANGEETA BAJAJ & ANR. Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate. VERSUS SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF SRI GURU NANAK PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioners by this writ petition seek implementation of the order of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 18.7.2011 passed in CM (Main) Nos. 444/1998 and 446/1998. As per this order dated 18.7.2011, petitioners were reinstated in service and respondent no.1-school was directed to comply with the provision of Rule 121 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 and make payment of back wages to the petitioners.2. Though, counsel for respondent no.1 at one stage sought to argue that Rule 121 does not apply to respondent no.1-school as it is a minority s...
N.K.Awasthi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6823/2012 &6824/2012 25th September, 2013 % 1. WP(C) 6823/2012& CM No.12842/2013 & 12843/2013 MAHESH KUMAR SETHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya and Ms. Harman Guliani, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R2/Airport Authority of India.2. WP(C) 6824/2012& CM No.12838/2013 & 12839/2013 N.K.AWASTHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya and Ms. Harman Guliani, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Pradeep Desodya, Adv. for Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R2/Airport Authority of India. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P,(C) No.6823/2012 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks the relief that direction should be issued to the respondent no.2/Airport Authority of India/employer to a...
Sh.Balbir Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6120/2013 25th September, 2013 % SH.BALBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.C. Dubey, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Narayan, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 4. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sujit Singh, Advocate and Mr. Anshumaan Sahni, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate withMr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.7 and 8. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by one Sh. Balbir Singh who is the General Secretary of DESU Mazdoor Sangh of Trade Union. As per the statement of the counsel for the petitioner made before me petitioner represents about 35,000 contractual workers who are working with the instrumentalities of State represented by respondent Nos.2 to 8 and such persons are mem...
Mahesh Kumar Sethi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6823/2012 &6824/2012 25th September, 2013 % 1. WP(C) 6823/2012& CM No.12842/2013 & 12843/2013 MAHESH KUMAR SETHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya and Ms. Harman Guliani, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R2/Airport Authority of India.2. WP(C) 6824/2012& CM No.12838/2013 & 12839/2013 N.K.AWASTHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya and Ms. Harman Guliani, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Pradeep Desodya, Adv. for Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R2/Airport Authority of India. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P,(C) No.6823/2012 1. By this writ petition, petitioner seeks the relief that direction should be issued to the respondent no.2/Airport Authority of India/employer to a...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Manager, Laxman Public School and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5556/1998 25th September, 2013 % ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Phogat, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus MANAGER, LAXMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak R. Dahiya, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner impugns the order dated 13.8.1998 of the Delhi School Tribunal (DST) dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against the termination order dated 15.12.1993 passed by the respondent No.1-school. Petitioners services were terminated pursuant to the report of the enquiry officer given after enquiry proceedings whereby petitioner, who was working as a Peon-cum-Driver in the respondent No.1-school, was found guilty of illegally obtaining and leaking/selling question papers to students of the school. The papers were with respect to the ...
Sh. D. K. Sharma Vs. Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4458/1998 25th September, 2013 % SH. D. K. SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate with Mr. H.L. Verma, Advocate. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. & ANR. Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner impugns the orders passed by the departmental authorities; of the disciplinary authority dated 29.1.1998 and appellate authority dated 24.6.1998; whereby penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner of reduction of pay by one stage in the same time scale for a period of one year with further direction that the petitioner will not earn increments of pay during the period of reduction and on the expiry of the period of reduction the penalty order will not have the effect of postponing his future increments of pay. This penalt...
K.K.Mathur and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.9953-70/2006 25th September, 2013 % K.K.MATHUR AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. K.N. Rai, Advocate with Mr. S.N. Rai, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.13459/2013 (under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC) For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and the review petition bearing No.252/2013 is restored. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.13460/2013 For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the review petition is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. Review Petition No.252/2013 and W.P.(C) No.9953/2006 1. I have heard the counsel for the petitioners on the main writ petition itself because it is contended that petitioners did not give any consent for withdrawal of th...
Krishna Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6111/2013 KRISHNA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sagar Dawar, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Ritagya Riti, Adv. for R-1/DDA. Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-2 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL ORDER2509.2013 % 1. The Petitioner migrated to Delhi from Punjab during the time when Punjab was disturbed on account of terrorist activities. The Petitioner and other migrants from Punjab were housed at Peera Garhi Relief Camp. On recommendation of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), a scheme was introduced for allotment of residential flats by the DDA to the migrants from Punjab.2. On 30.06.2003, the Petitioner got herself registered under the scheme and submitted an application bearing No.2264 along with registration money of `10,000/- by way of a demand draft.3. In the draw of lots held on 20.08.2008, the Petitioner was declared succes...
National Rifle Association of India Vs. Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:25. 09.2013 + RFA (OS) 47/2013 CM APPL.7466/2013 & 9058/2013 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jaiveer Shergill, Mr. Ankur Soodh and Mr. Rook Ray, Advocates. versus RAJYAVARDHAN SINGH RATHORE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pawanjit Singh Bindra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal is directed against a judgment and order of the learned Single Judge decreeing Civil Suit No.506/2013. The operative part of the impugned order reads as follows:24. In the result, a decree of declaration is passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant declaring the proceedings of the meeting of the Life Members and Annual Members of NRAI to be a nullity as also the nomination of eight members from these two catego...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »