Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Patel Bhavinkumar Ramesh Chandra Vs. National Board of Examination and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ram Phal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO2652012 Decided on :26. h September, 2013 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through Ms. Rashmi Priya, Adv. for Mr. J.S. Bhasin, Adv. versus RAM PHAL Through ..... Respondent Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 20th January, 2012 passed in a case tilted Shri Ram Phal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, by virtue of which the Commissioner Workmens Compensation has directed the payment of compensation of Rs. 83,145/- along with interest @6% to the employee from the date of the accident till the actual payment is made.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the accident had taken place on 29 th April, 1995 while the applicant was driving a bus bearing No.DL-IP-9699, near Baraut, Bahadurgarh. It has been stated that the petition for claiming of compensation was filed almost after a decade in the year 2005, and there...
Akhila B S Vs. Director General, Esi Corporation and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
#21 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 709/2013 AKHILA B S Through ..... Appellant Mr. K. K. Rai, Senior Counsel with Mr. P.V. Dinesh and Mr. Shantanu, Advocates versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, ESI CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Rekha Palli with Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for R-4. Date of Decision:25. h September, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM APPL. 15223/2013 in LPA 709/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. LPA 709/2013 & CM APPL. 15222/2013 1. Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 18th September, 2013 by virtue of which appellants writ petition seeking admission in MBBS course in ESIC Medical College under ESIC management quota in Rajaji Nagar, Bangalore and K.K. Nagar, Chennai, was dismissed.2. Learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition observed that on the date of hearing no seat wa...
Satish Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :25. h September, 2013 + CRL.A.372/2000 SATISH .... Appellant Through : Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate. VERSUS STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against a judgment dated 11.02.2000 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.5/1998 arising out of FIR No.446/1997 registered at Police Station Narela by which Satish (the appellant) was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 377 IPC. By an order dated 21.02.2000, he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 18.10.1997 at about 03.40 P.M. he committed unnatural intercourse with Arun Kumar aged four years on the back side of Govt. Sr.Secondary Model School, Bawana near Canal Bhawana. Police machinery was set in motion when DD No.14 (Ex.PW6/A) was recorded at Police Post Bawana on getting information...
Shivam Jasra Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: September 17, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: September 25, 2013 + LPA 670/2013 SHIVAM JASRA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.Advocate and Mr.G.D.Goel, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Deepak, Mr.Sanjiv Goel and Mr.Vishal Tyagi, Advocates versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Advocate with Mr.Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr.Vipin Singh, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Saket Sikri, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CM No.14209/2013 Allowed subject to just exceptions. LPA No.670/2013 1. Recording that for the reasons contained in the decision dated September 02, 2013, dismissing W.P.(C) No.5458/2013 Pavani Bhardwaj Vs. UOI & Ors., vide impugned order dated September 06, 2013 (wrongly typed as July 03, 2012) W.P.(C) No.5620/2013 filed by the appellant has been dismissed by the learned Sin...
Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Sonia Bala Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. No.9164/2012 in CS(OS) 1318/2011 Reserved on:19. h September, 2013 Decided on:25. h September, 2013 % RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Naresh Khanna, Advocate. versus SONIA BALA JAIN Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Manoranjan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By this application the Plaintiff seeks a decree as per provisions of Order XXII Rule 4 r/w Section 151 CPC in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant directing the Defendant to execute and register sale deed in favour of the Plaintiff in respect of the suit property and release the balance sale consideration of Rs. 15 lakhs which stands deposited in this Court to the Defendant and in case of failure on the part of the Defendant, to appoint an officer of this Court to execute and register the sale deed of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff.2. Learned counsel for the Plaintiff/applicant contends that the Agreement to Sell dated 3rd Ap...
M/S Sabharwal Medicos Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 09.2013 Date of Decision:25. 09.2013 % + W.P.(C) 7369 of 2011 M/S SABHARWAL MEDICOS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 7370 of 2011 S.J.ENTERPRISE & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 9118 of 2011 SIDHAANT LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 7375 of 2011 Reserved on:20. 09.2013 KULBHUSHAN WASAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Throu...
Satnam Chand Kohli Vs. Sri Nath Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h September, 2013. + RFA4142013, CMs No.13529/2013 (for condonation of 3 years 2 months & 6 days delay in filing the appeal) & 13531/2013 (for condonation of 3 days delay in re-filing the appeal) SATNAM CHAND KOHLI Through: ....... Appellant Mr. J.S. Vohra, Advocate. Versus SRI NATH MALHOTRA Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 18 th March, 2010 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-03, (North) Delhi of dismissal of Civil Suit No.305/2008 (instituted on 20th November, 1997) filed by the appellant for recovery of Rs.7,02,000/- from the respondent/defendant on account of repayment of loan of Rs.4 lakhs.2. The appeal is accompanied with an application for condonation of 3 years 2 months and 6 days delay in filing the same and with yet another application for condonation of 3 days delay in re-filing the a...
S.J. Enterprise and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 09.2013 Date of Decision:25. 09.2013 % + W.P.(C) 7369 of 2011 M/S SABHARWAL MEDICOS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 7370 of 2011 S.J.ENTERPRISE & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 9118 of 2011 SIDHAANT LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod K. Sharma, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Amit Yadav, Advs. + W.P.(C) 7375 of 2011 Reserved on:20. 09.2013 KULBHUSHAN WASAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Throu...
Harsh Saluja Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 3604/2013 HARSH SALUJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Chaudhry and Mr Anil Gera, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sushil K. Tekriwal and Mr A. Gosain, Advs. for R-1 Mr Vinay Sabharwal, Adv for Respondents 2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court was a student of Salwan Public School. In the first term examination, the petitioner obtained 07 out of 100 marks in Economics and 26 out of 100 marks in Mathematics. In the second term, the petitioner got 34 out of 100 marks in Mathematics and 46 out of 100 marks in Economics. As per the instructions issued by Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, which are binding on the school, in subjects, without practical work (Mathematics is a subject without practical work), while computing he marks in class XI as a whole, of the marks obtained in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »